Literature DB >> 20951814

What is a good patient reported outcome after total hip replacement?

N K Arden1, A Kiran, A Judge, L C Biant, M K Javaid, D W Murray, A J Carr, C Cooper, R E Field.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing movement to collect and report patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) following total hip replacement (THR). In the UK, the procedure specific PROM of choice is the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). It is currently unclear how to use this information to determine outcome following surgery. The aim of this study was to define a threshold for the OHS that is correlated with patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: A district general hospital (St. Helier Hospital, Carshalton, UK). PARTICIPANTS: 799 patients receiving THR from 1995 to 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 12 and 24 months after surgery patients were asked if they were satisfied with surgery and completed the OHS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify thresholds of follow-up OHS, which best discriminated patient satisfaction. Analyses were stratified by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), baseline OHS and patient expectations.
RESULTS: 91.9% of patients were satisfied with THR at 12 months (92.8% at 24 months). Using the ROC technique, the OHS at 12 months associated with patient satisfaction was 38 and at 24 months 33. The OHS at 24 months associated with satisfaction was higher in those with highest tertile of baseline OHS (30, 33, 43 respectively), and lowest tertile of BMI.
CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a value of the OHS that predicts patient satisfaction 12-24 months following THR within a standard clinical setting. However, this threshold is markedly influenced by pre-operative OHS and should be stratified accordingly.
Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20951814     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  27 in total

1.  Could the tendon degeneration and the fatty infiltration of the gluteus medius affect clinical outcome in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Antonio Pasquale Vadalà; Daniele Mazza; Davide Desideri; Raffaele Iorio; Gianluca Fedeli; Marco Scrivano; Pierluigi Serlorenzi; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of patient quality of life scores and satisfaction after common orthopedic surgical interventions.

Authors:  Jason B T Lim; Andrew C C Chou; William Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo; Shi-Lu Chia; Pak Lin Chin; Darren K J Tay; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-19

3.  Patient expectations and satisfaction 6 and 12 months following total hip and knee replacement.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Eric Bohm; Lynda Loucks; Michael J Dunbar; Deborah A Marshall; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Painful hip arthroplasty: definition.

Authors:  Paolo Ferrata; Serafino Carta; Mattia Fortina; Daniele Scipio; Alberto Riva; Salvatore Di Giacinto
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-05

Review 5.  How to define responders in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Cyrus Cooper; Jonathan D Adachi; Thomas Bardin; Francis Berenbaum; Bruno Flamion; Helgi Jonsson; John A Kanis; Franz Pelousse; Willem F Lems; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Susanne Reiter; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli; Olivier Bruyère
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Body mass index is not a clinically meaningful predictor of patient reported outcomes of primary hip replacement surgery: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  A Judge; R N Batra; G E Thomas; D Beard; M K Javaid; D W Murray; P A Dieppe; K E Dreinhoefer; K Peter-Guenther; R Field; C Cooper; N K Arden
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  You'll know when you're ready: a qualitative study exploring how patients decide when the time is right for joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Deborah A Marshall; Gillian A Hawker; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; Cy Frank; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score: Assessed against generic and disease-specific questionnaires.

Authors:  A Paulsen; A Odgaard; S Overgaard
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 9.  Systematic review: do patient expectations influence treatment outcomes in total knee and total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Tsjitske M Haanstra; Tobias van den Berg; Raymond W Ostelo; Rudolf W Poolman; Elise P Jansma; Ilse P Jansma; Pim Cuijpers; Henrica Cw de Vet
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Patient acceptable symptom states after totalhip or knee replacement at mid-term follow-up: Thresholds of the Oxford hip and knee scores.

Authors:  J C Keurentjes; F R Van Tol; M Fiocco; C So-Osman; R Onstenk; A W M M Koopman-Van Gemert; R G Pöll; R G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.