OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing movement to collect and report patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) following total hip replacement (THR). In the UK, the procedure specific PROM of choice is the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). It is currently unclear how to use this information to determine outcome following surgery. The aim of this study was to define a threshold for the OHS that is correlated with patient satisfaction. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A district general hospital (St. Helier Hospital, Carshalton, UK). PARTICIPANTS: 799 patients receiving THR from 1995 to 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 12 and 24 months after surgery patients were asked if they were satisfied with surgery and completed the OHS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify thresholds of follow-up OHS, which best discriminated patient satisfaction. Analyses were stratified by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), baseline OHS and patient expectations. RESULTS: 91.9% of patients were satisfied with THR at 12 months (92.8% at 24 months). Using the ROC technique, the OHS at 12 months associated with patient satisfaction was 38 and at 24 months 33. The OHS at 24 months associated with satisfaction was higher in those with highest tertile of baseline OHS (30, 33, 43 respectively), and lowest tertile of BMI. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a value of the OHS that predicts patient satisfaction 12-24 months following THR within a standard clinical setting. However, this threshold is markedly influenced by pre-operative OHS and should be stratified accordingly.
OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing movement to collect and report patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) following total hip replacement (THR). In the UK, the procedure specific PROM of choice is the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). It is currently unclear how to use this information to determine outcome following surgery. The aim of this study was to define a threshold for the OHS that is correlated with patient satisfaction. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: A district general hospital (St. Helier Hospital, Carshalton, UK). PARTICIPANTS: 799 patients receiving THR from 1995 to 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 12 and 24 months after surgery patients were asked if they were satisfied with surgery and completed the OHS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify thresholds of follow-up OHS, which best discriminated patient satisfaction. Analyses were stratified by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), baseline OHS and patient expectations. RESULTS: 91.9% of patients were satisfied with THR at 12 months (92.8% at 24 months). Using the ROC technique, the OHS at 12 months associated with patient satisfaction was 38 and at 24 months 33. The OHS at 24 months associated with satisfaction was higher in those with highest tertile of baseline OHS (30, 33, 43 respectively), and lowest tertile of BMI. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified a value of the OHS that predicts patient satisfaction 12-24 months following THR within a standard clinical setting. However, this threshold is markedly influenced by pre-operative OHS and should be stratified accordingly.
Authors: Jason B T Lim; Andrew C C Chou; William Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo; Shi-Lu Chia; Pak Lin Chin; Darren K J Tay; Seng Jin Yeo Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2015-04-19
Authors: Barbara L Conner-Spady; Eric Bohm; Lynda Loucks; Michael J Dunbar; Deborah A Marshall; Tom W Noseworthy Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Cyrus Cooper; Jonathan D Adachi; Thomas Bardin; Francis Berenbaum; Bruno Flamion; Helgi Jonsson; John A Kanis; Franz Pelousse; Willem F Lems; Jean-Pierre Pelletier; Johanne Martel-Pelletier; Susanne Reiter; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli; Olivier Bruyère Journal: Curr Med Res Opin Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 2.580
Authors: A Judge; R N Batra; G E Thomas; D Beard; M K Javaid; D W Murray; P A Dieppe; K E Dreinhoefer; K Peter-Guenther; R Field; C Cooper; N K Arden Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Barbara L Conner-Spady; Deborah A Marshall; Gillian A Hawker; Eric Bohm; Michael J Dunbar; Cy Frank; Tom W Noseworthy Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Tsjitske M Haanstra; Tobias van den Berg; Raymond W Ostelo; Rudolf W Poolman; Elise P Jansma; Ilse P Jansma; Pim Cuijpers; Henrica Cw de Vet Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: J C Keurentjes; F R Van Tol; M Fiocco; C So-Osman; R Onstenk; A W M M Koopman-Van Gemert; R G Pöll; R G H H Nelissen Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 5.853