Literature DB >> 25893470

Task-irrelevant stimulus-reward association induces value-driven attentional capture.

Chisato Mine1, Jun Saiki.   

Abstract

Rewards affect the deployment of visual attention in various situations. Evidence suggests that the stimulus associated with reward involuntary captures attention (value-driven attentional capture; VDAC). Recent studies report VDAC even when the reward-associated feature does not define the target (i.e., task-irrelevant). However, these studies did not conduct the test phase without reward, thus the effect may be qualitatively different from those in the previous studies. In the current study, we tested if task-irrelevant features induce VDAC even in the test phase with no reward. We used a flanker task during reward learning to create color-reward associations (training phase), and then tested the effect of color during visual search (test phase). Reward learning with no spatial uncertainty in the flanker task induced VDAC, even when reward signaling color was associated with both target and distractor (Experiments 1 and 2). In Experiment 3, a significant VDAC with a color for all letters indicated that target-distractor discrimination is not necessary for VDAC. Finally, a significant VDAC (Experiment 4) with color rectangular frames around the letters indicated binding reward-associated features to task-relevant letters is not necessary for VDAC. All these effects were obtained in the test phase without reward, thus VDAC in the current study is comparable to previous studies using target-defining features. These findings indicate that task-relevance is not a necessary condition for VDAC from reward-associated features, suggesting that reward-associated learning in VDAC is more indirect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25893470     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-015-0894-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  18 in total

1.  Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Rebecca Garrison; Leeland Rogers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 2.  Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

3.  Multiple reward-cue contingencies favor expectancy over uncertainty in shaping the reward-cue attentional salience.

Authors:  Matteo De Tommaso; Tommaso Mastropasqua; Massimo Turatto
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-25

4.  Dissociable Components of Experience-Driven Attention.

Authors:  Haena Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Madeline Halpern
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Attentional capture by signals of reward persists following outcome devaluation.

Authors:  Poppy Watson; Yenti Pavri; Jenny Le; Daniel Pearson; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.699

7.  Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.

Authors:  Mark K Britton; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  How does the attention system learn from aversive outcomes?

Authors:  Haena Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2020-07-27

9.  Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Berno Bucker; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention.

Authors:  Michel Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.