Literature DB >> 9404208

Effect of automatic kV selection on dose and contrast for a mammographic X-ray system.

K C Young1, M L Ramsdale, A Rust, J Cooke.   

Abstract

The effect of automatic tube potential (kV) selection on breast dose and contrast has been assessed using a Philips MammoDiagnost 3000 mammography X-ray set. The performance of the X-ray set using automatic kV selection has been compared with that found using a fixed kV of 28. The AUTOKV mode selected 25 kV for breasts with thickness up to about 50 mm, which increased the contrast by 5-10%, and increased the mean glandular dose (MGD) per film by, on average, 30-40%. For large breasts with a compressed thickness of 70 mm and above, kVs up to 30 were selected so that the average MGD per film was reduced by 19% from 3.62 to 2.94 mGy, with an estimated loss in contrast of about 4-8%. For all breasts the mean MGD per film was 1.85 +/- 0.05 mGy where AUTOKV was used, and 1.74 +/- 0.08 mGy per film when 28 kV was used. The overall image quality of the mammograms was found to be higher when AUTOKV was used. Overall, the AUTOKV facility on this X-ray set generally worked well and resulted in slightly higher contrast and slightly better image quality at the price of a small increase in the average dose for this patient group when compared with the usual UK procedure of using a fixed 28 kV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9404208     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.70.838.9404208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  3 in total

1.  Determination of Tube Output (kVp) and Exposure Mode for Breast Phantom of Various Thicknesses/Glandularity for Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Kamal Izdihar; Kumari Chelliah Kanaga; Vijayalakshimi Krishnapillai; Tamanang Sulaiman
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

Review 2.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.