| Literature DB >> 25889187 |
Xia Xiao1, Jian Sun2, Yi Chen3, Rui-Juan Huang4, Ting Huang5, Guilin Gary Qiao6, Yu-Feng Zhou7, Ya-Hong Liu8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Haemophilus parasuis (H. parasuis) causes Glässer's disease and multisystem infectious disease. It is one of the major causes of nursery mortality in swine herds. Cefquinome (CEQ) is proposed for the treatment of pigs against respiratory tract infection. However, few studies have investigated the PK/PD characteristics and PK/PD cutoff of this drug against H. parasuis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25889187 PMCID: PMC4350951 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0343-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Serum pharmacokinetic parameters after IV administration at 2 mg/kg bodyweight in a two-compartment open model used for Monte Carlo simulation
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| T1/2ka (h) | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| T1/2β (h) | 2.34 | 0.09 |
| CL/F(L/kg) | 0.09 | 0.03 |
| F(%) | 116.29 | 14.72 |
Figure 1Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of cefquinome against (213 strains in total).
Figure 2Time–kill curve of cefquinome against in PK/PD model.
Figure 3Sigmoid max model relationships between antimycoplasmal effect [E, log 1 (cfu/mL)] and T% > MIC of cefquinome in PK/PD model against with an inoculum size of 1 × 10 cfu/mL.
Pharmacodynamic analysis of data acquired from time-killing studies for cefquinome against
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Log | −4.7 |
| Log | 1.6 |
| EC50 (h) | 48.9 |
| T% > MIC (bacteriostatic) (h) | 38.7 |
| T% > MIC (bactericidal) (h) | 60.9 |
| T% > MIC (bacterial elimination) (h) | 70.9 |
| Slope (N) | 4.7 |
Where E 0 is the change in log10 cfu/mL after 24 h incubation in the control sample compared to the initial inoculum. E max is the difference in effect between the greatest amount of growth (as seen for the growth control, E 0) and the greatest amount of kill. C e is the T% > MIC in the effect compartment. EC 50 is the T% > MIC value producing a 50% reduction in bacterial counts from the initial inoculum, and N is the Hill coefficient that describes the steepness of the T% > MIC–effect curve.
Figure 4Probability of target attainment (PTA) for the treatment with cefquinome dose of 2 mg/kg/24 h.
Probability of target attainment (PTA) and breakpoints of cefquinome against with recommended regimens (2 mg/kg/24 h and 4 mg/kg/12 h)
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 mg/kg/12 h | 76.87 | 72.52 | 0.3 |
| 2 mg/kg/12 h | 82.19 | 80.63 | 0.6 |
| 4 mg/kg/12 h | 85.79 | 84.37 | 1.3 |
| 6 mg/kg/12 h | 86.46 | 85.88 | 1.9 |
| 8 mg/kg/12 h | 87.64 | 86.76 | 2.6 |
| 16 mg/kg/12 h | 90.03 | 88.55 | 5.2 |
| 2 mg/kg/24 h | 44.79 | 28.18 | 0.06 |
| 4 mg/kg/24 h | 61.77 | 43.52 | 0.15 |
| 8 mg/kg/24 h | 76.91 | 61.6 | 0.3 |
| 16 mg/kg/24 h | 81.25 | 77.21 | 0.6 |
| 32 mg/kg/24 h | 86.06 | 82.21 | 1.2 |
| 60 mg/kg/24 h | 86.64 | 84.74 | 2.2 |
Figure 5Probability of target attainment (PTA) for the treatment with cefquinome dose of 4 mg/kg/12 h.