Literature DB >> 3888488

Clinical pharmacokinetics of the third generation cephalosporins.

L Balant, P Dayer, R Auckenthaler.   

Abstract

At the present time, the third generation cephalosporins that are already on the market or close to this point include cefsulodin, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, latamoxef, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime and cefotetan. Other newer compounds are also under development but have not been included in this review. None of the third generation compounds is suitable for oral administration and, accordingly, their pharmacokinetics have been studied only after intravenous and intramuscular administration. Microbiological assays and HPLC methods have been used for the measurement of plasma/serum, urine, bile and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations. As found with cefotaxime, microbiological assays should only be used when the full metabolite spectrum of a particular drug is known, as otherwise, the presence of microbiologically active metabolites may lead to erroneous conclusions. Under normal conditions, the major route of elimination is via the kidneys for cefsulodin, latamoxef, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime and cefotetan. In contrast, cefoperazone is mainly eliminated in the bile, whereas cefotaxime and ceftriaxone depend both on the liver and the kidneys for their elimination. With the exception of ceftriaxone, which has a longer elimination half-life (i.e. around 8 hours), all the other third generation cephalosporins have a t1/2 ranging between 1.5 and 2.5 hours. Plasma protein binding is variable from one compound to another. However, the clinical relevance of this parameter is not clearly established since tissue penetration also depends on the relative affinity of the drug for tissue components. Third generation cephalosporins seem to penetrate adequately into the CSF and, thus pharmacokinetically appear to be appropriate agents for the treatment of meningitis. The degree of modification of pharmacokinetic parameters by renal insufficiency or hepatic diseases depends, as for other drugs, on the extent to which the compound is excreted via the kidneys or the liver. The third generation cephalosporins have been extensively studied under these conditions and recommendations for dosage modification in special circumstances are available for most of them. The pharmacokinetics of some third generation cephalosporins may be modified in neonates and elderly patients. Accordingly, their use at the extremes of age must be accompanied by a closer than usual clinical monitoring of the patient. From a clinical point of view, the third generation cephalosporins possess reliable pharmacokinetic properties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3888488     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198510020-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  263 in total

Review 1.  A review of the penetration of antibiotics into CSF and its clinical significance.

Authors:  R Norrby
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis Suppl       Date:  1978

2.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in normal and uremic subjects.

Authors:  A Leroy; F Leguy; F Borsa; G R Spencer; J P Fillastre; G Humbert
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in patients with renal insufficiency.

Authors:  L S Welage; R W Schultz; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparative pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and moxalactam.

Authors:  T B Tjandramaga; A Van Hecken; A Mullie; R Verbesselt; P J De Schepper; L Verbist
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Cefotaxime kinetics after intravenous and intramuscular injection of single and multiple doses.

Authors:  H C Neu; P Aswapokee; K P Fu; I Ho; C Matthijssen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Disulfiram-like reaction to certain cephalosporins.

Authors:  J V Uri; D B Parks
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  The comparative pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and cefotaxime in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S M Harding; A J Monro; J E Thornton; J Ayrton; M I Hogg
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Enterococcal infections in patients treated with moxalactam.

Authors:  R C Moellering
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec

9.  Pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of moxalactam in biliary tract infections.

Authors:  O Mueller; K Fabricius; E Krueger; U Rueckert
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec

10.  Epimers of moxalactam: in vitro comparison of activity and stability.

Authors:  R Wise; P J Wills; K A Bedford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  40 in total

1.  Effects of age and gender on pharmacokinetics of cefepime.

Authors:  R H Barbhaiya; C A Knupp; K A Pittman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Disposition kinetics, bioavailability and renal clearance of cefepime in calves.

Authors:  M M Ismail
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Pharmacokinetics of a new, orally available ceftriaxone formulation in physical complexation with a cationic analogue of bile acid in rats.

Authors:  Seulki Lee; Sang Kyoon Kim; Dong Yun Lee; Su Young Chae; Youngro Byun
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Clearance of ceftriaxone in critical care patients with acute renal failure.

Authors:  G Heinemeyer; J Link; W Weber; V Meschede; I Roots
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Pharmacological properties of cephalosporins.

Authors:  W Christ
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  Pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of cefmetazole in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

Authors:  M T Borin; G R Peters; T C Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Cefetamet pivoxil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  The renal clearance of cefuroxime and ceftazidime and the effect of probenecid on their tubular excretion.

Authors:  C A Verhagen; H Mattie; E Van Strijen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Dosage adjustment for ceftazidime in patients with impaired renal function.

Authors:  R van Dalen; T B Vree; A M Baars; E Termond
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Pharmacokinetics of cefetamet (Ro 15-8074) and cefetamet pivoxil (Ro 15-8075) after intravenous and oral doses in humans.

Authors:  J R Koup; U C Dubach; R Brandt; R Wyss; K Stoeckel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.