Literature DB >> 11120938

Use of preclinical data for selection of a phase II/III dose for evernimicin and identification of a preclinical MIC breakpoint.

G L Drusano1, S L Preston, C Hardalo, R Hare, C Banfield, D Andes, O Vesga, W A Craig.   

Abstract

One of the most challenging issues in the design of phase II/III clinical trials of antimicrobial agents is dose selection. The choice is often based on preclinical data from pharmacokinetic (PK) studies with animals and healthy volunteers but is rarely linked directly to the target organisms except by the MIC, an in vitro measure of antimicrobial activity with many limitations. It is the thesis of this paper that rational dose-selection decisions can be made on the basis of the pharmacodynamics (PDs) of the test agent predicted by a mathematical model which uses four data sets: (i) the distribution of MICs for clinical isolates, (ii) the distribution of the values of the PK parameters for the test drug in the population, (iii) the PD target(s) developed from animal models of infection, and (iv) the protein binding characteristics of the test drug. In performing this study with the new anti-infective agent evernimicin, we collected a large number (n = 4,543) of recent clinical isolates of gram-positive pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, and Staphylococcus aureus) and determined the MICs using E-test methods (AB Biodisk, Stockholm, Sweden) for susceptibility to evernimicin. Population PK data were collected from healthy volunteers (n = 40) and patients with hypoalbuminemia (n = 12), and the data were analyzed by using NPEM III. PD targets were developed with a neutropenic murine thigh infection model with three target pathogens: S. pneumoniae (n = 5), E. faecalis (n = 2), and S. aureus (n = 4). Drug exposure or the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve/MIC (AUC/MIC) was found to be the best predictor of microbiological efficacy. There were three possible microbiological results: stasis of the initial inoculum at 24 h (10(7) CFU), log killing (pathogen dependent, ranging from 1 to 3 log(10)), or 90% maximal killing effect (90% E(max)). The levels of protein binding in humans and mice were similar. The PK and PD of 6 and 9 mg of evernimicin per kg of body weight were compared; the population values for the model parameters and population covariance matrix were used to generate five Monte Carlo simulations with 200 subjects each. The fractional probability of attaining the three PD targets was calculated for each dose and for each of the three pathogens. All differences in the fractional probability of attaining the target AUC/MIC in this PD model were significant. For S. pneumoniae, the probability of attaining all three PD targets was high for both doses. For S. aureus and enterococci, there were increasing differences between the 6- and 9-mg/kg evernimicin doses for reaching the 2 log killing (S. aureus), 1 log killing (enterococci), or 90% E(max) AUC/MIC targets. This same approach may also be used to set preliminary in vitro MIC breakpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11120938      PMCID: PMC90233          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.1.13-22.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  15 in total

1.  In vitro Gram-positive antimicrobial activity of evernimicin (SCH 27899), a novel oligosaccharide, compared with other antimicrobials: a multicentre international trial.

Authors:  R N Jones; R S Hare; F J Sabatelli
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Relationship between foscarnet exposure, baseline cytomegalovirus (CMV) blood culture and the time to progression of CMV retinitis in HIV-positive patients.

Authors:  G L Drusano; F Aweeka; J Gambertoglio; M Jacobson; M Polis; H C Lane; C Eaton; S Martin-Munley
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.177

3.  Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of SCH27899 (Ziracin) tested against gram-positive species including recommendations for routine susceptibility testing methods and quality control. Quality Control Study Group.

Authors:  R N Jones; S A Marshall; M E Erwin
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Comparative study with enoxacin and netilmicin in a pharmacodynamic model to determine importance of ratio of antibiotic peak concentration to MIC for bactericidal activity and emergence of resistance.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; M C Groner; S H Zinner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacodynamics of levofloxacin: a new paradigm for early clinical trials.

Authors:  S L Preston; G L Drusano; A L Berman; C L Fowler; A T Chow; B Dornseif; V Reichl; J Natarajan; M Corrado
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-01-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Correlation between in vitro and in vivo activity of antimicrobial agents against gram-negative bacilli in a murine infection model.

Authors:  B Fantin; J Leggett; S Ebert; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Role for dual individualization with cefmenoxime.

Authors:  J J Schentag; I L Smith; D J Swanson; C DeAngelis; J E Fracasso; A Vari; J W Vance
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Impact of dosing intervals on activity of gentamicin and ticarcillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in granulocytopenic mice.

Authors:  A U Gerber; W A Craig; H P Brugger; C Feller; A P Vastola; J Brandel
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Pharmacodynamics of a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent in a neutropenic rat model of Pseudomonas sepsis.

Authors:  G L Drusano; D E Johnson; M Rosen; H C Standiford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacodynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously ill patients.

Authors:  A Forrest; D E Nix; C H Ballow; T F Goss; M C Birmingham; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  81 in total

1.  Rational dose selection for a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor through use of population pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  G L Drusano; K H P Moore; J P Kleim; W Prince; A Bye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Application of a mathematical model to prevent in vivo amplification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations during therapy.

Authors:  Nelson Jumbe; Arnold Louie; Robert Leary; Weiguo Liu; Mark R Deziel; Vincent H Tam; Reetu Bachhawat; Christopher Freeman; James B Kahn; Karen Bush; Michael N Dudley; Michael H Miller; George L Drusano
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Use of Monte Carlo simulations to select therapeutic doses and provisional breakpoints of BAL9141.

Authors:  Johan W Mouton; Anne Schmitt-Hoffmann; Stuart Shapiro; Norman Nashed; Nieko C Punt
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Should IV Antibiotics Be Administered by Prolonged Infusion?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2010-05

5.  Nonlinear pharmacokinetics of piperacillin in healthy volunteers--implications for optimal dosage regimens.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; Martina Kinzig; Verena Jakob; Ulrike Holzgrabe; Fritz Sörgel; Nicholas H G Holford
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  An oracle: antituberculosis pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics, clinical correlation, and clinical trial simulations to predict the future.

Authors:  Jotam Pasipanodya; Tawanda Gumbo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Population pharmacokinetics at two dose levels and pharmacodynamic profiling of flucloxacillin.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Martina Kinzig-Schippers; Jürgen B Bulitta; Ulrike Holzgrabe; George L Drusano; Fritz Sörgel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacokinetics of aztreonam in healthy subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis and evaluation of dose-exposure relationships using monte carlo simulation.

Authors:  Alexander A Vinks; Ronald N van Rossem; Ron A A Mathôt; Harry G M Heijerman; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Effect of differences in MIC values on clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections caused by gram-negative organisms treated with levofloxacin.

Authors:  Robyn Defife; Marc H Scheetz; Joe M Feinglass; Michael J Postelnick; Kimberly K Scarsi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of gatifloxacin in a lethal murine Bacillus anthracis inhalation infection model.

Authors:  Paul G Ambrose; Alan Forrest; William A Craig; Chistopher M Rubino; Sujata M Bhavnani; George L Drusano; Henry S Heine
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.