BACKGROUND: National surveillance of gastrointestinal pathogens, such as Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 (STEC O157), is key to rapidly identifying linked cases in the distributed food network to facilitate public health interventions. In this study, we used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as a tool to inform national surveillance of STEC O157 in terms of identifying linked cases and clusters and guiding epidemiological investigation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 334 isolates randomly sampled from 1002 strains of STEC O157 received by the Gastrointestinal Bacteria Reference Unit at Public Health England, Colindale, in 2012. The genetic distance between each isolate, as estimated by WGS, was calculated and phylogenetic methods were used to place strains in an evolutionary context. RESULTS: Estimates of linked clusters representing STEC O157 outbreaks in England and Wales increased by 2-fold when WGS was used instead of traditional typing techniques. The previously unidentified clusters were often widely geographically distributed and small in size. Phylogenetic analysis facilitated identification of temporally distinct cases sharing common exposures and delineating those that shared epidemiological and temporal links. Comparison with multi locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) showed that although MLVA is as sensitive as WGS, WGS provides a more timely resolution to outbreak clustering. CONCLUSIONS: WGS has come of age as a molecular typing tool to inform national surveillance of STEC O157; it can be used in real time to provide the highest strain-level resolution for outbreak investigation. WGS allows linked cases to be identified with unprecedented specificity and sensitivity that will facilitate targeted and appropriate public health investigations.
BACKGROUND: National surveillance of gastrointestinal pathogens, such as Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 (STEC O157), is key to rapidly identifying linked cases in the distributed food network to facilitate public health interventions. In this study, we used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as a tool to inform national surveillance of STEC O157 in terms of identifying linked cases and clusters and guiding epidemiological investigation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 334 isolates randomly sampled from 1002 strains of STEC O157 received by the Gastrointestinal Bacteria Reference Unit at Public Health England, Colindale, in 2012. The genetic distance between each isolate, as estimated by WGS, was calculated and phylogenetic methods were used to place strains in an evolutionary context. RESULTS: Estimates of linked clusters representing STEC O157 outbreaks in England and Wales increased by 2-fold when WGS was used instead of traditional typing techniques. The previously unidentified clusters were often widely geographically distributed and small in size. Phylogenetic analysis facilitated identification of temporally distinct cases sharing common exposures and delineating those that shared epidemiological and temporal links. Comparison with multi locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) showed that although MLVA is as sensitive as WGS, WGS provides a more timely resolution to outbreak clustering. CONCLUSIONS: WGS has come of age as a molecular typing tool to inform national surveillance of STEC O157; it can be used in real time to provide the highest strain-level resolution for outbreak investigation. WGS allows linked cases to be identified with unprecedented specificity and sensitivity that will facilitate targeted and appropriate public health investigations.
Authors: Glen E Mellor; Eby M Sim; Robert S Barlow; Beatriz A D'Astek; Lucia Galli; Isabel Chinen; Marta Rivas; Kari S Gobius Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Udo Buchholz; Helen Bernard; Dirk Werber; Merle M Böhmer; Cornelius Remschmidt; Hendrik Wilking; Yvonne Deleré; Matthias an der Heiden; Cornelia Adlhoch; Johannes Dreesman; Joachim Ehlers; Steen Ethelberg; Mirko Faber; Christina Frank; Gerd Fricke; Matthias Greiner; Michael Höhle; Sofie Ivarsson; Uwe Jark; Markus Kirchner; Judith Koch; Gérard Krause; Petra Luber; Bettina Rosner; Klaus Stark; Michael Kühne Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-10-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C Ihekweazu; K Carroll; B Adak; G Smith; G C Pritchard; I A Gillespie; N Q Verlander; L Harvey-Vince; M Reacher; O Edeghere; B Sultan; R Cooper; G Morgan; P T N Kinross; N S Boxall; A Iversen; G Bickler Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2011-11-18 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Marc W Allard; Yan Luo; Errol Strain; Cong Li; Christine E Keys; Insook Son; Robert Stones; Steven M Musser; Eric W Brown Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Alexander Mellmann; Dag Harmsen; Craig A Cummings; Emily B Zentz; Shana R Leopold; Alain Rico; Karola Prior; Rafael Szczepanowski; Yongmei Ji; Wenlan Zhang; Stephen F McLaughlin; John K Henkhaus; Benjamin Leopold; Martina Bielaszewska; Rita Prager; Pius M Brzoska; Richard L Moore; Simone Guenther; Jonathan M Rothberg; Helge Karch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Timothy M Walker; Camilla L C Ip; Ruth H Harrell; Jason T Evans; Georgia Kapatai; Martin J Dedicoat; David W Eyre; Daniel J Wilson; Peter M Hawkey; Derrick W Crook; Julian Parkhill; David Harris; A Sarah Walker; Rory Bowden; Philip Monk; E Grace Smith; Tim E A Peto Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: J McDonnell; T Dallman; S Atkin; D A Turbitt; T R Connor; K A Grant; N R Thomson; C Jenkins Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2013-02-21 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Aaron M Walsh; Fiona Crispie; Kareem Daari; Orla O'Sullivan; Jennifer C Martin; Cornelius T Arthur; Marcus J Claesson; Karen P Scott; Paul D Cotter Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 4.792