Hannah K Ratner1, Timothy R Sampson, David S Weiss. 1. aDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics Program bEmory Vaccine Center cYerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia dDivision of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California eDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA *Hannah K. Ratner and Dr Timothy R. Sampson contributed equally to the writing of this article.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: CRISPR-Cas systems are prokaryotic immune systems against invading nucleic acids that adapt as new environmental threats arise. There are emerging examples of CRISPR-Cas functions in bacterial physiology beyond their role in adaptive immunity. This highlights the poorly understood, but potentially common, moonlighting functions of these abundant systems. We propose that these noncanonical CRISPR-Cas activities have evolved to respond to stresses at the cell envelope. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we discuss recent literature describing the impact of the extracellular environment on the regulation of CRISPR-Cas systems, and the influence of CRISPR-Cas activity on bacterial physiology. These described noncanonical CRISPR-Cas functions allow the bacterial cell to respond to the extracellular environment, primarily through changes in envelope physiology. SUMMARY: This review discusses the expanding noncanonical functions of CRISPR-Cas systems, including their roles in virulence, focusing mainly on their relationship to the cell envelope. We first examine the effects of the extracellular environment on regulation of CRISPR-Cas components, and then discuss the impact of CRISPR-Cas systems on bacterial physiology, concentrating on their roles in influencing interactions with the environment including host organisms.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: CRISPR-Cas systems are prokaryotic immune systems against invading nucleic acids that adapt as new environmental threats arise. There are emerging examples of CRISPR-Cas functions in bacterial physiology beyond their role in adaptive immunity. This highlights the poorly understood, but potentially common, moonlighting functions of these abundant systems. We propose that these noncanonical CRISPR-Cas activities have evolved to respond to stresses at the cell envelope. RECENT FINDINGS: Here, we discuss recent literature describing the impact of the extracellular environment on the regulation of CRISPR-Cas systems, and the influence of CRISPR-Cas activity on bacterial physiology. These described noncanonical CRISPR-Cas functions allow the bacterial cell to respond to the extracellular environment, primarily through changes in envelope physiology. SUMMARY: This review discusses the expanding noncanonical functions of CRISPR-Cas systems, including their roles in virulence, focusing mainly on their relationship to the cell envelope. We first examine the effects of the extracellular environment on regulation of CRISPR-Cas components, and then discuss the impact of CRISPR-Cas systems on bacterial physiology, concentrating on their roles in influencing interactions with the environment including host organisms.
Authors: Ki Hyun Nam; Fran Ding; Charles Haitjema; Qingqiu Huang; Matthew P DeLisa; Ailong Ke Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Yan Zhang; Nadja Heidrich; Biju Joseph Ampattu; Carl W Gunderson; H Steven Seifert; Christoph Schoen; Jörg Vogel; Erik J Sontheimer Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2013-05-23 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: R Louwen; D Horst-Kreft; A G de Boer; L van der Graaf; G de Knegt; M Hamersma; A P Heikema; A R Timms; B C Jacobs; J A Wagenaar; H P Endtz; J van der Oost; J M Wells; E E S Nieuwenhuis; A H M van Vliet; P T J Willemsen; P van Baarlen; A van Belkum Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Hannah K Ratner; Andrés Escalera-Maurer; Anaïs Le Rhun; Siddharth Jaggavarapu; Jessie E Wozniak; Emily K Crispell; Emmanuelle Charpentier; David S Weiss Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Ambarish Biswas; Raymond H J Staals; Sergio E Morales; Peter C Fineran; Chris M Brown Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 3.969