Literature DB >> 26598368

Functional Analysis of Bacteriophage Immunity through a Type I-E CRISPR-Cas System in Vibrio cholerae and Its Application in Bacteriophage Genome Engineering.

Allison M Box1, Matthew J McGuffie1, Brendan J O'Hara1, Kimberley D Seed2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The classical and El Tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1, the etiological agent of cholera, are responsible for the sixth and seventh (current) pandemics, respectively. A genomic island (GI), GI-24, previously identified in a classical biotype strain of V. cholerae, is predicted to encode clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-associated proteins (Cas proteins); however, experimental evidence in support of CRISPR activity in V. cholerae has not been documented. Here, we show that CRISPR-Cas is ubiquitous in strains of the classical biotype but excluded from strains of the El Tor biotype. We also provide in silico evidence to suggest that CRISPR-Cas actively contributes to phage resistance in classical strains. We demonstrate that transfer of GI-24 to V. cholerae El Tor via natural transformation enables CRISPR-Cas-mediated resistance to bacteriophage CP-T1 under laboratory conditions. To elucidate the sequence requirements of this type I-E CRISPR-Cas system, we engineered a plasmid-based system allowing the directed targeting of a region of interest. Through screening for phage mutants that escape CRISPR-Cas-mediated resistance, we show that CRISPR targets must be accompanied by a 3' TT protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) for efficient interference. Finally, we demonstrate that efficient editing of V. cholerae lytic phage genomes can be performed by simultaneously introducing an editing template that allows homologous recombination and escape from CRISPR-Cas targeting. IMPORTANCE: Cholera, caused by the facultative pathogen Vibrio cholerae, remains a serious public health threat. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) provide prokaryotes with sequence-specific protection from invading nucleic acids, including bacteriophages. In this work, we show that one genomic feature differentiating sixth pandemic (classical biotype) strains from seventh pandemic (El Tor biotype) strains is the presence of a CRISPR-Cas system in the classical biotype. We demonstrate that the CRISPR-Cas system from a classical biotype strain can be transferred to a V. cholerae El Tor biotype strain and that it is functional in providing resistance to phage infection. Finally, we show that this CRISPR-Cas system can be used as an efficient tool for the editing of V. cholerae lytic phage genomes.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26598368      PMCID: PMC4719448          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00747-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  53 in total

1.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator.

Authors:  Gavin E Crooks; Gary Hon; John-Marc Chandonia; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio cholerae: genes that correlate with cholera endemic and pandemic disease.

Authors:  Michelle Dziejman; Emmy Balon; Dana Boyd; Clare M Fraser; John F Heidelberg; John J Mekalanos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The pathogenicity of nonenterotoxigenic Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 biotype El Tor isolated from sewage water in Brazil.

Authors:  M M Levine; R E Black; M L Clements; L Cisneros; A Saah; D R Nalin; D M Gill; J P Craig; C R Young; P Ristaino
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Whole-genome sequence comparisons reveal the evolution of Vibrio cholerae O1.

Authors:  Eun Jin Kim; Chan Hee Lee; G Balakrish Nair; Dong Wook Kim
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 17.079

6.  Molecular cloning of the plasmid RP4 primase region in a multi-host-range tacP expression vector.

Authors:  J P Fürste; W Pansegrau; R Frank; H Blöcker; P Scholz; M Bagdasarian; E Lanka
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  General Transduction in Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  J E Ogg; T L Timme; M M Alemohammad
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  A globally distributed mobile genetic element inhibits natural transformation of Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Ankur B Dalia; Kimberley D Seed; Stephen B Calderwood; Andrew Camilli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA Cleavage during Type III CRISPR-Cas Immunity.

Authors:  Poulami Samai; Nora Pyenson; Wenyan Jiang; Gregory W Goldberg; Asma Hatoum-Aslan; Luciano A Marraffini
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Evolutionary consequences of intra-patient phage predation on microbial populations.

Authors:  Kimberley D Seed; Minmin Yen; B Jesse Shapiro; Isabelle J Hilaire; Richelle C Charles; Jessica E Teng; Louise C Ivers; Jacques Boncy; Jason B Harris; Andrew Camilli
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  37 in total

1.  CRISPR-Cas and Contact-Dependent Secretion Systems Present on Excisable Pathogenicity Islands with Conserved Recombination Modules.

Authors:  Megan R Carpenter; Sai S Kalburge; Joseph D Borowski; Molly C Peters; Rita R Colwell; E Fidelma Boyd
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Suppressing the CRISPR/Cas adaptive immune system in bacterial infections.

Authors:  P Gholizadeh; M Aghazadeh; M Asgharzadeh; H S Kafil
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  A decade of discovery: CRISPR functions and applications.

Authors:  Rodolphe Barrangou; Philippe Horvath
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 17.745

4.  High-Throughput Characterization of Cascade type I-E CRISPR Guide Efficacy Reveals Unexpected PAM Diversity and Target Sequence Preferences.

Authors:  Becky Xu Hua Fu; Michael Wainberg; Anshul Kundaje; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Viral Satellites Exploit Phage Proteins to Escape Degradation of the Bacterial Host Chromosome.

Authors:  Amelia C McKitterick; Stephanie G Hays; Fatema-Tuz Johura; Munirul Alam; Kimberley D Seed
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 21.023

6.  Engineering of Bacteriophage T4 Genome Using CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Pan Tao; Xiaorong Wu; Wei-Chun Tang; Jingen Zhu; Venigalla Rao
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.110

7.  Strategies for Editing Virulent Staphylococcal Phages Using CRISPR-Cas10.

Authors:  S M Nayeemul Bari; Forrest C Walker; Katie Cater; Barbaros Aslan; Asma Hatoum-Aslan
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.110

8.  Efficient Genome Engineering of a Virulent Klebsiella Bacteriophage Using CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Juntao Shen; Jinjie Zhou; Guo-Qiang Chen; Zhi-Long Xiu
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Selection of Genetically Modified Bacteriophages Using the CRISPR-Cas System.

Authors:  Miriam Manor; Udi Qimron
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2017-08-05

10.  Targeted Genome Editing of Virulent Phages Using CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Marie-Laurence Lemay; Ariane C Renaud; Geneviève M Rousseau; Sylvain Moineau
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2018-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.