| Literature DB >> 25886992 |
Konrad Zych1,2, Yang Li3,4, Joeri K van der Velde5, Ronny V L Joosen6, Wilco Ligterink7, Ritsert C Jansen8, Danny Arends9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic markers and maps are instrumental in quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping in segregating populations. The resolution of QTL localization depends on the number of informative recombinations in the population and how well they are tagged by markers. Larger populations and denser marker maps are better for detecting and locating QTLs. Marker maps that are initially too sparse can be saturated or derived de novo from high-throughput omics data, (e.g. gene expression, protein or metabolite abundance). If these molecular phenotypes are affected by genetic variation due to a major QTL they will show a clear multimodal distribution. Using this information, phenotypes can be converted into genetic markers.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25886992 PMCID: PMC4339742 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0475-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Bioinformatics ISSN: 1471-2105 Impact factor: 3.169
Figure 1Saturation results. A map comparison plot generated using the R/qtl function ’plot.map’ [15,16]. For each of the chromosomes, the original map (left) and the saturated map (right) are plotted. Lines are drawn to connect markers. Markers that exist in one map but not the other are indicated by short line segments. Before plotting, both maps were re-estimated using the R/qtl function ’est.map’. The original map consisted of five chromosomes and 69 markers at an average distance of 7.1 cM. The saturated map consists of the original 69 markers plus 497 expression-based markers at an average marker distance of 0.89 cM.
Figure 2Comparison of QTL profiles. Top Results of single-marker QTL mapping of a classical phenotype (y-axis) on the original (gray line), and the saturated map (green line). Only chromosome 1 is shown. X-axis - positions of the original markers on the genetic map. Bottom Positions of probes used during marker generation on chromosome 1. Gray dots - show positions of the original markers on the physical map. Colored dots and circles - show candidate markers detected by Pheno2Geno. Orange circles - show candidate markers removed because they showed significant environmental influence. Blue circles - show candidate markers removed because they showed an epistatic interaction with other genetic markers. Green dots - show markers used for saturation of the original map. The final saturated map consists of all the green and gray dots. The locations of the new markers on the old map are shown here so that maps are aligned for better clarity.
Figure 3Comparison of QTL detection power. a) LOD scores on the original and the saturated map. QTL mapping was performed on all 10,801 tiling array probes showing differential expression between parents (p<0.01 Student t-test) using the original and saturated maps. 5,837 out of 10,801 probes show a QTL with a L O D>5 on the original map. Blue dots - represent 3,943 probes (67.6%) that show an increased LOD score on the new saturated map. Moreover, 210 new QTLs were detected on the saturated map. Red dots - probes showing a decrease in LOD score on the saturated map. Green circles - are probes used to saturate the map. b) Changing LOD scores. For each of the phenotypes the top QTL peak was selected. If the peaks measured on the original and saturated maps shared a location, then the difference between the LOD scores was calculated. Solid green line - shows median of differences between QTL peaks from chromosome 4, calculated inside a sliding 10 cM window stepped across the chromosome with a step of 1 cM. For each of the windows the value was plotted in the middle of the compartment (thus no value for the first and the last 5 cM). Ticks on the x-axis show the position of the markers: tall gray ticks - show original markers; short green ticks - show markers selected by Pheno2Geno. Only one region, in which no new markers were added (75-80 cM), does not show an increase in power.