| Literature DB >> 25886061 |
Rutger K Balvers1, Martine L M Lamfers2, Jenneke J Kloezeman3, Anne Kleijn4, Lotte M E Berghauser Pont5, Clemens M F Dirven6, Sieger Leenstra7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The current standard of care for Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) consists of fractionated focal irradiation with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. A promising strategy to increase the efficacy of TMZ is through interference with the DNA damage repair machinery, by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase protein inhibition(PARPi). The objective of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic benefit of combination therapy in patient-derived glioma stem-like cells (GSC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25886061 PMCID: PMC4359449 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0427-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Figure 1PARPi potentiates TMZ therapy in conventional GBM cell lines on serum-supplemented medium. A) Viability of T98 and U373 cell lines treated at the indicated doses with TMZ and PARPi. Viability is indicated as a measure of ATP conversion into luminescence. Lines above columns indicate significance between two conditions with a p-value <0.05. If monotherapy with TMZ is significant when compared to non-treated controls, the significance of combination therapy when compared to non-treated controls is related and therefore not defined as such in the figure. B) Viability as a measure of confluence per well as measured by microscopy. Read out is performed at 5 days post treatment. C) Microscopic images of U373 and T98. From left to right the PARPi dosage increases from 0 to 10 uM. Lower panel depicts combination therapy with TMZ at indicated dosages. Note the differential effect of PARPi monotherapy between T98 and U373. D) Combination Index (CI) plotted against Fraction affected (Fa) for T98 and U373. PARPi with TMZ combination therapy is synergistic in T98 but not in U373. CI < 1 demonstrates synergistic interaction of combination therapy with TMZ and PARPi at the indicated Fa. CI > 1 demonstrates antagonistic effect of combination therapy at the indicated Fa.
Overview of GSC panel drug screening results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS249 | GBM | 53 | 215 | - / ND | 0.30 | 0.66 | 3.06 | 0.01 | 2.92 | 0.03 |
| GS187 | GBM | 73 | 394 | - / UM | 0.12 | 0.55 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 0 |
| GS41 | AOD | 64 | 1316 | ND | 0.11 | 0.61 | 1.74 | 0.08 | 0.92 | 0.19 |
| GS125 | GBM | 75 | 234 | + / UM | 0.21 | 0.71 | 1.59 | 0.17 | 1.78 | 0.06 |
| GS203 | GBM | 64 | 554 | - / M | 0.39 | 0.61 | 1.68 | 0.01 | 1.71 | 0.01 |
| GS184 | GBM | 50 | 833 | - / M | 0.16 | 0.74 | 1.40 | 0.10 | 1.66 | 0.01 |
| GS186 | GBM | 49 | 792 | - / M | 0.21 | 0.74 | 1.30 | 0.03 | 1.49 | 0 |
| GS224 | GBM | 58 | 101 | - / M | 0.17 | 0.73 | 1.15 | 0.20 | 1.20 | 0.03 |
| GS177 | GBM | 63 | 843 | - / M | 0.20 | 0.76 | 1.14 | 0.01 | 1.15 | 0.2 |
| GS182 | GBM | 70 | 835 | - / M | 0.38 | 0.51 | 1.14 | 0.02 | 1.31 | 0.05 |
| GS200 | GBM | 57 | 321 | - / ND | 0.48 | 0.35 | 1.16 | 0.02 | 1.18 | 0.08 |
| GS143 | GBM | 54 | 395 | - / ND | 0.60 | 0.32 | 1.17 | 0.40 | 1.32 | 0.09 |
| GS126 | GBM | 41 | 962 | + / M | 0.27 | 0.06 | 1.68 | 0.02 | 1.69 | 0.01 |
| GS79 | GBM | 71 | 384 | + / UM | 0.11 | 0.23 | 2.11 | 0.00 | 2.48 | 0 |
| GS124 | GBM | 71 | 1033 | + / ND | 0.22 | −0.11 | 1.19 | 0.40 | 1.19 | 0.06 |
| GS148 | AOD | 82 | 97 | + / UM | 0.20 | −0.07 | 1.15 | 0.80 | 1.15 | 0.06 |
| GS173 | GBM | 68 | 138 | + / ND | −0.05 | 0.14 | 1.24 | 0.07 | 1.73 | 0.01 |
| GS204 | GBM | 50 | 18 | + / UM | 0.07 | 0.02 | 1.17 | 0.03 | 1.17 | 0.04 |
| GS161 | GBM | 62 | 264 | + / M | 0.17 | −0.02 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 0.80 | 0.2 |
| GS160 | GBM | 46 | 46 | + / UM | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.83 | 0.03 | 0.75 | 0 |
The separation between TMZ sensitive and resistant groups is based on monotherapy results for TMZ 100 μM results. Significance is depicted as a p-value derived Student’s T-test of the most effective single agent compared to combination therapy. For OS, boxes without shading depict patients that were alive at the moment of composing this article. Abbreviations as followed; AOD = Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma, GBM = Glioblastoma Multiforme, OS = Overall Survival in days, MGMT = O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, Blot = Western blotting results which can be positive (+) or negatieve (−), Methyl = Methylation assay which can be Methylated or UnMethylated). ND = Not determined.
Figure 2PARPi and TMZ monotherapy efficacy in GS cultures. A) Panel of GS cultures tested for sensitivity to PARPi at 10 uM. Readout of viability was performed at day 5 and is depicted as a percentage when compared to non-treated controls. * Illustrates a p-value <0.05. B) GS culture panel tested against indicated concentrations in uM of TMZ monotherapy. Viability at day 5 is indicated as percentages when compared to paired non-treated controls. * indicates p < 0.05 as compared to non treated controls. C) Overview of western blotting results derived from GS cultures. MGMT protein expression is indicated with actin protein expression used as a loading control. TMZ sensitivity is indicated with an S (sensitive), R (resistant) and ND (TMZ sensitivity not determined in monotherapy screen). For several GSCs protein isolates were loaded in separate runs as technical controls.
Figure 3PARP inhibition increases TMZ induced double stranded breaks, autophagy and apoptosis in GSCs. A) DSB induction is significantly enhanced by combination therapy. GSCs, MGMT(+) and MGMT(-) were scored for γH2Ax positive cells, as an indicator for DSB induction,16 hrs post-treatment. GS160 results are all significant as compared to non-treated controls. For the other cultures, significance is indicated as described in the following; * indicates p < 0,05 as compared to non-treated controls. # indicates p < 0.05 as compared to monotherapy. R = combination therapy responder, NR = non-responder. B) Apoptosis induction is significantly enhanced by combination therapy in responder GSCs but not in non-responders. Wells were scored for apoptosis positive cells by live imaging. Read out was performed at 48 hrs post-treatment. Apoptotic cells were significantly (p < 0.05) increased after combination therapy as compared to monontherapy in GSC79. For GS160 cells were not affected by TMZ/ABT-888 combination therapy while the positive control (etoposide 0.1 mM) was successfully inducing apoptosis. C) TMZ and ABT-888 induce autophagy in GS79, which is augmented by combination therapy. Autophagosomes were counted per well and compared to non-treated controls. Readout was performed 16 hrs post-treatment. Compared to controls, all treatment conditions were significantly increased p < 0.05. However, combination therapy vs. monotherapy with ABT-888 or TMZ was found not significantly increased (p = 0.3 and p = 0.4). D) Representative images acquired by the Incucyte FLR of GS79 stained for autophagosomes at indicated treatment conditions. Note the accumulation of speckled dots in treated cells, specifically localized in enlarged cytopathic cells. E) Combination therapy enhances autophagic flux as compared to monotherapy in GS79. Western blot 24 hrs post-treatment indicates the accumulation of LC3-II (lipidated isoform) that is indicative for increased autophagic flux. Actin blots serve as loading controls.