| Literature DB >> 25882062 |
Adedayo Adeyanju1, Christopher Little2, Jianming Yu3, Tesfaye Tesso4.
Abstract
Stalk rots are important biotic constraints to sorghum production worldwide. Several pathogens may be associated with the disease, but Macrophomina phaseolina and Fusarium thapsinum are recognized as the major causal organisms. The diseases become more aggressive when drought and high-temperature stress occur during grain filling. Progress in genetic improvement efforts has been slow due to lack of effective phenotyping protocol and the strong environmental effect on disease incidence and severity. Deployment of modern molecular tools is expected to accelerate efforts to develop resistant hybrids. This study was aimed at identifying genomic regions associated with resistance to both causal organisms. A sorghum diversity panel consisting of 300 genotypes assembled from different parts of the world was evaluated for response to infection by both pathogens. Community resources of 79,132 single nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) markers developed on the panel were used in association studies using a multi-locus mixed model to map loci associated with stalk rot resistance. Adequate genetic variation was observed for resistance to both pathogens. Structure analysis grouped the genotypes into five subpopulations primarily based on the racial category of the genotypes. Fourteen loci and a set of candidate genes appear to be involved in connected functions controlling plant defense response. However, each associated SNP had relatively small effect on the traits, accounting for 19-30% of phenotypic variation. Linkage disequilibrium analyses suggest that significant SNPs are genetically independent. Estimation of frequencies of associated alleles revealed that durra and caudatum subpopulations were enriched for resistant alleles, but the results suggest complex molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to both pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Fusarium thapsinum; Macrophomina phaseolina; association mapping; sorghum; sorghum diversity panel; stalk rots
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25882062 PMCID: PMC4478546 DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.016394
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1Field procedure for administering the treatments and scoring phenotypic data. Artificial inoculation with Macrophomina phaseolina using the toothpick method (A). Longitudinally split stalk of resistant (B) and susceptible (C) genotypes showing contrasting tissue lesion and stalk disintegration by the pathogen.
Means and repeatability estimates for stalk rot traits
| Environment | Ottawa 2012 | Manhattan 2011 and 2012 Combined | Overall Combined | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traits | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | |||
| Total lesion length (TLL) | 4.09 | 1.27–11.82 | 0.79 | 5.56 | 1.83–16.37 | 0.95 | 5.06 | 2.20–12.36 | 0.69 |
| Major lesion length (MLL) | 3.74 | 1.34–10.58 | 0.82 | 4.77 | 2.02–10.40 | 0.96 | 4.43 | 2.07–10.32 | 0.75 |
| Relative TLL | 0.05 | 0.02–0.14 | 0.71 | 0.05 | 0.02–0.13 | 0.97 | 0.05 | 0.02–0.12 | 0.64 |
| Relative MLL | 0.05 | 0.02–0.14 | 0.73 | 0.04 | 0.02–0.11 | 0.97 | 0.04 | 0.02–0.10 | 0.66 |
| Total lesion length (TLL) | 4.19 | 1.17–26.31 | 0.93 | 4.62 | 2.18–12.26 | 0.93 | 4.49 | 1.97–15.67 | 0.78 |
| Major lesion length (MLL) | 3.85 | 1.1721.30 | 0.93 | 4.07 | 1.85–12.71 | 0.94 | 4.00 | 1.94–11.24 | 0.80 |
| Relative TLL | 0.05 | 0.02–0.27 | 0.89 | 0.04 | 0.02–0.11 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 0.02–0.15 | 0.71 |
| Relative MLL | 0.05 | 0.02–0.22 | 0.87 | 0.04 | 0.02–0.13 | 0.97 | 0.04 | 0.02–0.10 | 0.73 |
| Plant height | 84.9 | 27.5–160 | 0.75 | 113.5 | 63.2–228.3 | 0.87 | 104 | 62.5–190.8 | 0.78 |
| Days to flowering | 70 | 53–78 | 0.90 | 63 | 48–77 | 0.68 | 65.4 | 50–80 | 0.53 |
Means are reported as the average of the least-square means calculated within and across environments.
Genotypic correlations from the combined analysis of sorghum diversity panel evaluated in three environments
| Disease Traits | Days to Flowering | Plant Height | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLL | MLL | RTLL | RMLL | TLL | MLL | RTLL | RMLL | ||||
| TLL | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.86 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.60 | −0.31 | 0.65 | ||
| MLL | 0.99 | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.97 | 0.10 | 0.63 | 0.62 | −0.22 | 0.69 | ||
| RTLL | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.98 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.82 | −0.41 | 0.22 | ||
| RMLL | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | −0.31 | 0.21 | ||
| TLL | 0.94 | 0.10 | 0.86 | 0.90 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.79 | −0.10 | 0.57 | ||
| MLL | 0.90 | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.99 | 0.74 | 0.78 | −0.03 | 0.59 | ||
| RTLL | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.99 | −0.14 | −0.09 | ||
| RMLL | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.89 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | −0.06 | −0.04 | ||
| Days to flowering | −0.57 | −0.36 | −0.58 | −0.38 | −0.13 | −0.05 | −0.16 | −0.07 | 0.99 | ||
| Plant height | 5.58 | 5.36 | 1.45 | 1.22 | 3.65 | 3.92 | −0.47 | −0.19 | 0.01 | ||
The bold diagonal numbers are an estimate of genetic variance for each trait. Estimates of covariance between pairs of traits are shown below the diagonal, and genetic correlations between traits are shown above the diagonal. TLL, total lesion length; MLL, major lesion length; RTLL, relative total lesion length; RMLL, relative major lesion length.
Figure 2Population structure plot for the 257 entries based on 25,000 SNPs. The red, green, blue, and yellow bars correspond to the caudatum, kafir, guinea, and durra races, respectively. Vertical and horizontal axes represent the membership coefficient and genotypes, respectively.
Figure 3Association result for stalk rot resistance in a panel of 300 genotypes based on 79,132 SNPs. (A) Physical map locations of the SNPs (x-axis), the –log base 10 P values from a mixed linear model (y-axis), and the Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold based on effective number of independent tests (blue horizontal line). (B) Regional plots showing association mapping results for significantly associated SNPs located on chromosome 9. Plots are based on pooled significant SNPs for all stalk rot traits.
Chromosome locations, allele effect estimates, genes containing or adjacent to SNP, and other summary statistics for SNPs significantly associated to stalk rot resistance in the combined, and individual environment analysis from the multi-locus mixed model
| Gene Containing or Adjacent to SNP | SNP Physical Position (bp) | Disease Traits | Allele | N | Allele Effect | Annotated Gene Function | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sb09g029260 | Chr 9: 57816733 | 8.87E-07 | MLL ( | A | 174 | 1.14 | 0.12 | Chalcone synthase |
| G | 61 | — | ||||||
| Sb09g028280.1 | Chr 9: 57222599 | 7.01E-09 | MLL ( | C | 169 | 1.20 | 0.16 | ROP GTPase proteins |
| G | 57 | — | ||||||
| Sb09g029260 | Chr 9: 57816733 | 6.98E-07 | TLL ( | A | 174 | 1.50 | 0.11 | Chalcone synthase |
| G | 61 | — | ||||||
| Sb09g028280.1 | Chr 9: 57222599 | 8.60E-09 | TLL ( | C | 169 | 1.30 | 0.16 | ROP GTPase proteins |
| Sb09g028562 | Chr 9: 57272115 | 1.18E-07 | MLL ( | A | 58 | 0.84 | 0.13 | Transcription factor |
| G | 186 | — | ||||||
| Sb07g021660 | Chr 7:55702883 | 1.42E-07 | RMLL ( | T | 154 | 0.99 | Protein kinase | |
| G | 62 | — | ||||||
| Sb02g029630 | Chr 2:64623580 | 2.74E-07 | RMLL ( | G | 122 | 0.99 | 0.24 | Auxin-induced protein |
| A | 91 | — | ||||||
| Sb09g028562 | Chr 9:57272115 | 3.68E-07 | TLL ( | A | 58 | 0.87 | 0.13 | Transcription factor |
| G | 186 | — | ||||||
| Sb09g028562 | Chr 9:57272115 | 1.23E-07 | TLL ( | A | 58 | 0.83 | 0.14 | Transcription factor |
| G | 186 | — | ||||||
| Sb02g025370 | Chr 2:60129082 | 3.84E-10 | RMLL ( | C | 133 | 0.99 | PPR protein | |
| T | 84 | — | ||||||
| Sb07g023700 | Chr 7:58532122 | 8.28E-09 | RMLL ( | G | 203 | 0.99 | Unknown function | |
| A | 30 | — | ||||||
| Sobic.009G232300.1 | Chr 9:57231207 | 5.70E-08 | RMLL ( | T | 213 | 0.99 | Transcription factor | |
| C | 13 | — | ||||||
| Sb02g014480 | Chr 2:27851064 | 5.13E-06 | RMLL ( | A | 153 | 1.00 | 0.33 | Protein binding |
| G | 76 | |||||||
| Sb03g008300 | Chr 3:8738404 | 1.63E-08 | RTLL (MP) | A | 200 | 1.00 | Zinc finger protein | |
| G | 27 | — | ||||||
| Sb09g027770 | Chr 9:56646280 | 1.06E-07 | RTLL (MP) | A | 84 | — | Unknown function | |
| T | 149 | 0.99 | ||||||
| Sb04g036090 | Chr 4:65815798 | 1.20E-06 | RTLL (MP) | T | 211 | 0.99 | Signal transduction | |
| C | 17 | — | ||||||
| Sb08g020320 | Chr 8:51279094 | 5.23E-06 | RTLL (MP) | C | 129 | 0.99 | 0.34 | Protein binding |
| T | 79 | — | ||||||
| sobic.008G098200.1 | Chr 8:39230116 | 1.18E-06 | TLL (FT) | G | 203 | 1.21 | 0.13 | Unknown function |
| A | 21 | — |
TLL, total lesion length; MLL, major lesion length; RTLL, relative total lesion length; RMLL, relative major lesion length. MP, Macrophomina phaseolina; FT, Fusarium thapsinum.
N is the total number of lines with the specific SNP genotype. Allele effects back-transformed to the original scale in millimeters. 2, proportion of total line mean variance explained by SNP as computed by GAPIT.
Allele frequencies of significantly associated SNPs for overall combined, Manhattan combined, and Ottawa environments in the four major subpopulations
| Chromosome | SNP Physical Position (bp) | Resistant Allele | Allele Frequency (%) | N | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAD | DUR | GUI | KAF | CAD | DUR | GUI | KAF | ||||
| | 57816733 | G | 41.2 | 27.8 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 3.01E-04 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 57222599 | G | 35.3 | 16.7 | 9.5 | 20.8 | 1.29E-01 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 57272115 | G | 60.8 | 97.2 | 66.7 | 70.8 | 8.12E-04 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 55702883 | G | 72.6 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.20E-16 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 64623580 | A | 37.3 | 66.7 | 9.5 | 8.3 | 1.41E-07 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 60129082 | T | 11.7 | 36.1 | 71.4 | 58.3 | 4.00E-06 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 58532122 | A | 5.9 | 22.2 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.22E-02 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 57231207 | C | 13.7 | 0.0 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 1.33E-02 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 27851064 | G | 2.0 | 69.4 | 85.7 | 12.5 | 2.20E-16 | 51 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
| | 8738404 | G | 9.8 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 8.3 | 2.55E-04 | 46 | 34 | 21 | 24 |
| | 56646280 | A | 39.2 | 19.9 | 28.5 | 37.5 | 9.99E-03 | 44 | 34 | 21 | 24 |
| | 65815798 | C | 0.0 | 27.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.53E-06 | 50 | 33 | 21 | 24 |
| | 51279094 | T | 27.4 | 69.4 | 52.4 | 4.0 | 5.41E-08 | 44 | 29 | 21 | 24 |
| | 39230116 | A | 0.0 | 30.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.41E-08 | 47 | 36 | 21 | 24 |
SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; N, total number of lines within each subpopulation; CAD, caudatum; DUR, durra; GUI, guinea; KAF, kafir.