| Literature DB >> 25881084 |
Pietro Mancosu1, Pierina Navarria2, Giacomo Reggiori3, Luca Cozzi4, Antonella Fogliata5, Anna Gaudino6, Francesca Lobefalo7, Lucia Paganini8, Valentina Palumbo9, Barbara Sarina10, Antonella Stravato11, Luca Castagna12, Stefano Tomatis13, Marta Scorsetti14.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Total marrow (lymph-nodes) irradiation (TMI-TMLI) by volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was shown to be feasible by dosimetric feasibility studies. It was demonstrated that several partially overlapping arcs with different isocenters are required to achieve the desired coverage of the hematopoietic or lymphoid tissues targets and to spare the neighbouring healthy tissues. The effect of isocenter shifts was investigated with the treatment planning system but an in- vivo verification of the procedure was not carried out. The objective of this study was the in-vivo verification of the consistency between the delivered and planned doses using bi-dimensional GafChromic EBT3 films.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25881084 PMCID: PMC4397694 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0391-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiat Oncol ISSN: 1748-717X Impact factor: 3.481
Figure 1All Body frame immobilization support. (a) junctions between the successive boards; (b) head and neck frame; (c) Patient position during the TMI delivery using the All Body frame; (d) The three frames mounted on the couch before patient positioning.
Figure 2Example of dose distribution calculated by Eclipse for a TMLI patient. Two axial (a and b) and one coronal (c) views are reported. The black squares in the coronal view show the position of the GafChromics for in vivo dosimetry. The white and red lines and arrows in a) and b) represent the y coordinates where films were positioned. The lines in c) represent the z coordinates of the axial views shown in (a) and (b). Color-wash ranging from 50% to 90% was used as look-up-table.
Figure 3Dose distribution for the plan optimized on the phantom. In (a) the measurement setting of the solid phantom and the inserted GAF is shown. Dose distribution (range 50%-90%) calculated by the TPS for the phantom plan with the overlap is reported in (b). (c): GAI (5%, 5 mm) map related to phantom plan: in red are reported the points that didn’t pass the test (i.e. Δdose and DTA exceeded the threshold values of 5% and 5mm respectively). In (d-e) the X and Y profiles for the TPS (green) and the Gafchromic (red) are reported.
Data on the GAI using Δd of 3/5 mm and DTA of 3/5 mm for phantom study, and patients with the region in which the GafChromics are placed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PhantomGAP yes | 99.4 | 95.6 | 87.1 | 75.2 |
| Pz 1 H&N | 96.2 | 92.5 | 82.5 | 74.0 |
| Pz 1 Abdomen | 96.3 | 90.0 | 79.2 | 67.6 |
| Pz 2 H&N | 95.3 | 88.7 | 77.3 | 64.4 |
| Pz 2 Abdomen | 98.4 | 97.6 | 84.9 | 79.5 |
| Pz 3 H&N | 96.3 | 89.7 | 79.3 | 68.4 |
Figure 4In vivo measurement on the neck region (15 cm × 15 cm) for the first patient. Planar dose distribution for (a) the GafChromic and (b) the TPS for patient 1. In (c-d): profiles along the X and Y axis for the TPS (green) and the Gafchromic (red) are reported.
Figure 5In vivo measurement on the abdomen region (20 cm × 15 cm) for the second patient. (a) Planar dose distribution calculated by TPS for patient 2; in particular, the region where the GafChromic was acquired is outlined with a rectangle. (b) GAI (5%, 5 mm) evaluation with same scale as Figure 3. (c): integral dose profile along Y axis calculated by TPS with single arc contributions (4 different arcs for the present case). In (d) Profiles along the Y axis for the TPS (green) and the Gafchromic (red) are reported.