Literature DB >> 29719429

Prescribing practices of endocrine therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ in British Columbia.

A T Chaudhry1, T A Koulis1,2,3, C Speers4, R A Olson1,2.   

Abstract

Purpose: The mainstay of treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (dcis) involves surgery in the form of mastectomy or lumpectomy. Inconsistency in the use of endocrine therapy (et) for dcis is evident worldwide. We sought to assess the variation in et prescribing for patients with dcis across a population-based radiotherapy (rt) program and to identify variables that predict its use.
Methods: Data from a breast cancer database were obtained for women diagnosed with dcis in British Columbia from 2009 to 2014. Associations between et use and patient characteristics were assessed by chi-square test and multilevel multivariate logistic regression. The Kaplan-Meier method, with propensity score matching and Cox regression analysis, was used to assess the effects of et on overall survival (os) and relapse-free survival (rfs).
Results: For the 2336 dcis patients included in the study, et use was 13% in dcis patients overall, and 17% in patients with estrogen receptor-positive (er+) tumours treated with breast-conserving surgery and rt. Significant variation in et use by treatment centre was observed (range: 8%-23%; p < 0.001), and prescription of et by individual oncologists varied in the range 0%-40%. After controlling for confounding factors, age less than 50 years [odds ratio (or): 1.72; p = 0.01], treatment centre, er+ status (or: 5.33; p < 0.001), and rt use (or: 1.77; p < 0.001) were significant predictors of et use. No difference in os or rfs with the use of et was observed. Conclusions: In this population-based analysis, 13% of patients with dcis in British Columbia received et, with variation by treatment centre (8%-23%) and individual oncologist (0%-40%). Age less than 50 years, er+ status, and rt use were most associated with et use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  British Columbia; dcis; endocrine therapy; prescribing; treatment variation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29719429      PMCID: PMC5927784          DOI: 10.3747/co.25.3795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  19 in total

1.  Clinical outcome after selective treatment of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Philip Meijnen; Hester S A Oldenburg; Johannes L Peterse; Harry Bartelink; Emiel J Th Rutgers
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Population-based analysis of the impact and generalizability of the NSABP-B24 study on endocrine therapy for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  A C Lo; P T Truong; E S Wai; A Nichol; L Weir; C Speers; M M Hayes; C Baliski; S Tyldesley
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Tamoxifen use in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ and T1a/b N0 invasive carcinoma.

Authors:  Faina Nakhlis; Laura Lazarus; Nanjiang Hou; Simbi Acharya; Seema A Khan; Valerie L Staradub; Alfred W Rademaker; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Anastrozole versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with ductal carcinoma in situ undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy (NSABP B-35): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial.

Authors:  Richard G Margolese; Reena S Cecchini; Thomas B Julian; Patricia A Ganz; Joseph P Costantino; Laura A Vallow; Kathy S Albain; Patrick W Whitworth; Mary E Cianfrocca; Adam M Brufsky; Howard M Gross; Gamini S Soori; Judith O Hopkins; Louis Fehrenbacher; Keren Sturtz; Timothy F Wozniak; Thomas E Seay; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Impact of estrogen receptor expression and other clinicopathologic features on tamoxifen use in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  R Barry Hird; Alfred Chang; Vincent Cimmino; Kathleen Diehl; Michael Sabel; Celina Kleer; Mark Helvie; Anne Schott; Jennifer Young; Daniel Hayes; Lisa Newman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Effect of radiotherapy boost and hypofractionation on outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Elaine S Wai; Mary L Lesperance; Cheryl S Alexander; Pauline T Truong; Matthew Culp; Patricia Moccia; Jennifer F Lindquist; Ivo A Olivotto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Postoperative tamoxifen for ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Helen Staley; Iain McCallum; Julie Bruce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 8.  Current treatment and clinical trial developments for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Everett Bonner; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2007-11

9.  Tranexamic acid use and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty in the United States: retrospective analysis of effectiveness and safety.

Authors:  Jashvant Poeran; Rehana Rasul; Suzuko Suzuki; Thomas Danninger; Madhu Mazumdar; Mathias Opperer; Friedrich Boettner; Stavros G Memtsoudis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-08-12

10.  Tamoxifen Initiation After Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Erin J A Bowles; Jessica Islam; Lawrence Madziwa; Til Stürmer; Diem-Thy Tran; Diana S M Buist
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-01-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  National Variations in the Work-Up, Investigation, and Surgical Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast across Canadian Surgeons.

Authors:  Ryerson Seguin; Lashan Peiris
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.677

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.