Literature DB >> 17507634

Atypia in random periareolar fine-needle aspiration affects the decision of women at high risk to take tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention.

Vanessa K Goldenberg1, Victoria L Seewaldt, Victoria Scott, Gregory R Bean, Gloria Broadwater, Carol Fabian, Bruce Kimler, Carola Zalles, Isaac M Lipkus.   

Abstract

Random periareolar fine-needle aspiration (RPFNA) is a research procedure designed to (a) evaluate short-term breast cancer risk in women at high risk for developing breast cancer, and (b) track response to chemoprevention. Of import, cellular atypia in breast RPFNA is prospectively associated with a 5.6-fold increase in breast cancer risk in women at high risk. Among 99 women attending a clinic for high-risk breast cancer, we explored the effects of RPFNA cytology results on decision making pertaining to the use of tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention. No patient with nonproliferative or hyperplastic cytology subsequently elected to take tamoxifen. Only 7% of subjects with borderline atypia elected to take tamoxifen. In contrast, 50% with atypia elected to take tamoxifen. These results suggest that the provision of a biomarker of short-term risk can affect the motivation to take tamoxifen for chemoprevention. This conclusion is informative given that tamoxifen, due to its side effects, is often underused by women at high risk of developing breast cancer. Further research is needed to determine the mechanisms through which RPFNA results affect the decision to use tamoxifen, or any other breast cancer chemopreventive agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17507634     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  16 in total

Review 1.  Patient decisions about breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary E Ropka; Jess Keim; John T Philbrick
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Breast Cancer Chemoprevention among High-risk Women and those with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Laura L Reimers; Parijatham S Sivasubramanian; Dawn Hershman; Mary Beth Terry; Heather Greenlee; Julie Campbell; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Ramona Jayasena; Rossy Sandoval; Maria Alvarez; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Suitable trial designs and cohorts for preventive breast cancer agents.

Authors:  Kathrin Strasser-Weippl; Paul E Goss
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Addressing barriers to uptake of breast cancer chemoprevention for patients and providers.

Authors:  Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

5.  Chemoprevention Uptake for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction Varies by Risk Factor.

Authors:  Meghan R Flanagan; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Debra A Mangino; Monica Morrow; Melissa L Pilewskie
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Tamoxifen vs Raloxifene vs Exemestane for Chemoprevention.

Authors:  Laura Reimers; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-09-01

7.  Acceptance and adherence to chemoprevention among women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Elizabeth Matos Gomez; Elissa Clayton; Sharon Tollin; Nazanin Khakpour; Christine Laronga; Marie Catherine Lee; John V Kiluk
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.380

8.  ESR1 promoter hypermethylation does not predict atypia in RPFNA nor persistent atypia after 12 months tamoxifen chemoprevention.

Authors:  Joseph C Baker; Julie H Ostrander; Siya Lem; Gloria Broadwater; Gregory R Bean; Nicholas C D'Amato; Vanessa K Goldenberg; Craig Rowell; Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; Tracey Grant; Patrick G Pilie; Shauna N Vasilatos; Michelle M Troch; Victoria Scott; Lee G Wilke; Carolyn Paisie; Sarah M Rabiner; Alejandro Torres-Hernandez; Carola M Zalles; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Reproducibility of random periareolar fine needle aspiration in a multi-institutional Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine Ibarra-Drendall; Lee G Wilke; Carola Zalles; Victoria Scott; Laura E Archer; Siya Lem; Lisa D Yee; Joanne Lester; Swati Kulkarni; Christine Murekeyisoni; Marie Wood; Karen Wilson; Judy Garber; Carleen Gentry; April Stouder; Gloria Broadwater; Joseph C Baker; Shauna N Vasilatos; Elizabeth Owens; Sarah Rabiner; Abbey C Barron; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Comparison of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspirate versus Ductal Lavage for Risk Assessment and Prevention of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Abigail Hoffman; Rod Pellenberg; Catherine Ibarra Drendall; Victoria Seewaldt
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.