| Literature DB >> 25875325 |
Aaron R Lyon1, Kristy Ludwig2, Jessica Knaster Wasse3, Alex Bergstrom2, Ethan Hendrix2, Elizabeth McCauley2.
Abstract
The current study evaluated why and how school mental health clinicians use standardized assessment tools in their work with youth and families. Quantitative and qualitative (focus group) data were collected prior to and following a training and consultation sequence as part of a trial program to assess school clinician's (n = 15) experiences administering standardized tools to youth on their caseloads (n = 191). Findings indicated that, although assessment use was initially somewhat low, clinicians used measures to conduct initial assessments with the bulk of their caseloads (average = 62.2%) during the implementation period. Clinicians also reported on factors influencing their use of assessments at the client, provider, and system levels; perceived functions of assessment; student responses to assessment use; and use of additional sources of clinically-relevant information (primarily educational data) for the purposes of assessment and progress monitoring. Implications for the contextual appropriateness of standardized assessment and training in assessment tools are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Assessment; Implementation; School mental health; Training
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 25875325 PMCID: PMC4500742 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-015-0626-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health ISSN: 0894-587X