| Literature DB >> 25874964 |
Jing Xu1, Zhi-Xun Guan1, Bo Zhao1, Yan-Yan Wang1, Yun Cao1, Hui-Qin Zhang1, Xing-Quan Zhu2, Yong-Kang He3, Chao-Ming Xia1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis has decreased significantly in prevalence and intensity of infection in China, thus more accurate and sensitive methods are desperately needed for the further control of schistosomiasis. The present work aimed to assess the utility of the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for detection of light intensity infection or false-negative patients and patients post-treatment, targeting the highly repetitive retrotransposon SjR2 of Schistosoma japonicum. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25874964 PMCID: PMC4395225 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Schematic representation of rabbit infections and blood sample collections.
General characteristics of the study population.
| EPG | No. male (mean age and range) | No. female (mean age and range) | Total population (mean age and range) |
|---|---|---|---|
| >400 | 4 (21.5,11–53) | 0 | 4 (21.5,11–53) |
| 100–400 | 11 (51.8,27–70) | 2 (35.0,23–47) | 13 (49.2,23–70) |
| <100 | 65 (46.3,9–74) | 28 56.0,39–70) | 93 (49.5,11–53) |
Detection results of EPG, LAMP, IHA, ELISA and worm burden in rabbit experiments after infection of Schistosoma japonicum cercaiea.
| Post-infection | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No.EPG | (positive rate, %) | No.EPG | (positive rate, %) | No.EPG | (positive rate, %) | |||||||
| LAMP | IHA | ELISA | LAMP | IHA | ELISA | LAMP | IHA | ELISA | ||||
| 3d | None | 50 | 0 | 0 | None | 50 | 0 | 0 | None | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| 1w | None | 50 | 0 | 0 | None | 50 | 0 | 0 | None | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| 2w | None | 100 | 0 | 0 | None | 100 | 0 | 0 | None | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| 3w | None | 100 | 0 | 0 | None | 100 | 0 | 0 | None | 50 | 0 | 0 |
| 4w | None | 100 | 0 | 0 | None | 100 | 0 | 0 | None | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 5w | None | 100 | 100 | 0 | None | 100 | 100 | 0 | None | 100 | 0 | 0 |
| 6w | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 7w | 16 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 8 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 16 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 8w | 8 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 16 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 9w | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | 8 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 10w | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 11w | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | 8 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 12w | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | 8 | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 13w | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 14w | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | None | 50 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 15w | None | 50 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 16w | None | 50 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 17w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 18w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 19w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 50 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 20w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 50 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 21w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 22w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 23w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 24w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 25w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 26w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 50 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 27w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 28w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 29w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 50 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| 30w | None | 0 | 100 | 100 | None | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| Male worms | 10 | 0 | 18 | |||||||||
| Female worms | 3 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||
*All of the rabbits in Group 1 were sacrificed on the 7th week post-infection.
**None means no egg was found by triplicate Kato-Katz thick smears in three fecal samples.
Fig 2Detection of Schistosoma japonicum DNA in sera of rabbits with light-infection by LAMP.
Serum samples were collected at 3 days (3d) and 1–7 weeks (1w–7w) post-infection. Tube N, serum of non-infected rabbits; tube P, DNA of S. japonicum adult worm (positive control).
Fig 3Detection of Schistosoma japonicum DNA in sera of rabbits after treatment with praziquantel by LAMP.
Serum samples were collected from 15weeks to 20 weeks post-infection (8–13 weeks post-treatment). Tube N, serum of non-infected rabbits (negative control); tube P, DNA of S. japonicum adult worm (positive control).
Results of ELISA, IHA and LAMP for diagnosis of 110 Schsitosoma japonicum positive cases by Kato-Katz method.
| Methods | No. examined cases | Sensitivity (%) (95%CI) | Specificity (%) (95%CI) | PPV(95%CI) | NPV(95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELISA | 110 | 84.6 (77.9–91.3) | 85.7 (79.2–92.2) | 93.9 (89.2–98.6) | 67.9 (55.3–80.5) |
| IHA | 110 | 91.8 (86.7–96.9) | 88.1 (82.0–94.2) | 95.3 (91.3–99.3) | 80.4 (68.9–91.9) |
| LAMP | 110 | 95.5 (91.6–99.4) | 100 | 100 | 89.4 (80.6–98.2) |
*The sensitivity of LAMP assay and ELISA showed significant difference (χ2 = 7.273, P = 0.007), and there was little difference between LAMP and IHA (χ2 = 1.221, P = 0.269), and between ELISA and IHA (χ2 = 2.791 P = 0.095).
Comparison of ELISA, IHA and LAMP for diagnosis of different infection intensities of Schsitosoma japonicum in 110 samples.
| No. positive (sensitivity, %, 95%CI) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intensity of infection (EPG) | No. examined cases | ELISA | IHA | LAMP | χ2 |
|
| <100 | 93 | 78 (83.9) (76.4–91.4) | 85 (93.4) (88.4–98.4) | 89 (95.7) (91.6–99.8) | 7.627 | 0.022 |
| 100–400 | 13 | 11 (84.6) | 12 (92.3) | 12 (92.3) | / | / |
| >400 | 4 | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | / | / |
Comparison of ELISA, IHA and LAMP for diagnosis of 93 serum samples with various low-intensity infection of Schistosoma japonicum.
| Intensity of infection (EPG) | No. examined cases | No. positive (positive rate, %, 95%CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELISA | IHA | LAMP | χ2 |
| ||
| <10 | 41 | 34 (82.9, 71.4–91.4) | 39 (95.1, 88.5–100) | 39 (95.1, 88.5–100) | 4.657 | 0.097 |
| 10–39 | 42 | 35 (83.3, 72.0–94.6) | 36 (85.7, 75.1–96.3) | 41 (97.6, 93.0–100) | 6.157 | 0.046 |
| 40–99 | 10 | 9 (90.0) | 9 (90.0) | 9 (90.0) | / | / |
Comparison of negative conversion rate of ELISA, IHA and LAMP assay in 47 cases infected with Schistosoma japonicum after treatment with praziquantel.
| Periods after treatment | No. examined cases | No. (negative conversion rate, %, 95%CI) | χ2 |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ELISA | IHA | LAMP | ||||
| 3 months | 47 | 8(17.0, 6.3–27.7) | 11(23.4, 11.3–35.5) | 11(23.4, 11.3–35.5) | 0.76 | 0.683 |
| 6 months | 47 | 9(19.1, 7.9–30.3) | 20(42.5, 28.4–56.6) | 29(61.7, 47.8–75.6) | 17.63 | <0.0001 |
| 9 months | 47 | 12(25.5, 13.0–38.0) | 15(31.9, 18.6–45.2) | 39(83.0, 72.3–92.7) | 37.43 | <0.0001 |
LAMP for detection of “healthy” human serum samples from endemic and non-endemic areas.
| serum samples | No. examined cases | No. positive | Positive rate (%) (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-endemic area | 42 | 0 | 0 |
| Endemic area | 60 | 10 | 16.7 (7.3–26.1) |