| Literature DB >> 22952862 |
Yinchang Zhu1, Wanquan Hua, Ming Xu, Wei He, Xiaoting Wang, Yang Dai, Song Zhao, Jianxia Tang, Shixia Wang, Shan Lu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis japonica remains a real threat to public health in China. The currently used immunodiagnostic assays are sensitive and have a certain degree of specificity, however, they all use complex crude antigens, are based on detection of schistosome-specific antibodies, and have been shown to cross-react with other parasitic diseases. Therefore, these assays cannot be used to evaluate chemotherapy efficacy. The development of highly sensitive and highly specific immunodiagnostic techniques that can monitor the decline of antibodies specific for S. japonica will be extremely valuable as part of the ongoing strategy to control schistosomiasis in endemic areas. Here we report on the identification of unique fraction antigens of soluble egg antigen (SEA) to which the antibodies disappear 7 weeks after effective treatment. Furthermore, we use these SEA fractions to develop a modified assay with both high sensitivity and specificity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22952862 PMCID: PMC3432135 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Western blot analysis of SEA fractions recognized by sera from three rabbits before and after treatment at different time points.
(A). SEA fractions recognized by the sera from infected rabbits before treatment; (B). SEA fractions recognized by the rabbit sera at 7 weeks after treatment; (C). SEA fractions recognized by the rabbit sera at 11 weeks after treatment.
Testing of serum samples from patients infected with schistosome or other parasites and healthy donors by FA-ELISA, SEA-ELISA, and S-ELISA.
| Subjects | No. of serum samples | No. (%) of positive detection by different assays | ||
| FA-ELISA | SEA-ELISA | S-ELISA | ||
|
| ||||
| Acute | 67 | 61 (91.0%) | 63 (94.0%) | 57 (85.1%) |
| Chronic | 94 | 90 (95.7%) | 91 (96.8%) | 83 (88.3%) |
|
| ||||
| Clonorchiasis | 40 | 0 | 2(5.0%) | 1(2.5%) |
| Fasciolopsiasis | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paragonimiasis | 10 | 0 | 3 (30%) | 1 (10%) |
| Healthy donors | 60 | 0 | 1 (1.7%) | 1 (1.7%) |
Cases diagnosed by stool examination (100% positive).
Comparison between FA-DIGFA and SEA-DIGFA for testing sera from patients infected with schistosome and other parasites.
| Subjects | No. of serum samples | No. (%) of positive detection by different assays | |
| FA-DIGFA | SEA-DIGFA | ||
| Chronic schistosomiasis | 54 | 51(94.4%) | 52(96.3%) |
| Clonorchiasis | 30 | 0 | 3(10%) |
| Paragonimiasis | 19 | 0 | 5(26.3%) |
| Healthy donors | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Cases diagnosed by stool examination (100% positive).
Monitoring the disappearance of schistosome specific antibodies using FA-ELISA and SEA-ELISA.
| Chemotherapy | No. of subjects | No. (%) of positive detection by different assays | |
| FA-ELISA | SEA-ELISA | ||
|
| 30 | 28 (93.33%) | 29 (96.67%) |
|
| |||
| 8 months | 22 | 14 (63.64%) | 20 (90.91%) |
| 12 months | 23 | 10 (43.48%) | 19 (82.61%) |
| 18 months | 22 | 2 (9.09%) | 13 (59.09%) |
Cases diagnosed by stool examination (100% positive).
Stool examination 100% negative by Month12 following treatment.
Comparison of 16 different diagnostic systems for schistosomiasis japonica.
| Diagnostic Methods | % of positive schistosomiasis parasite antigen detections | ||||
| Healthy donors | Chronic schistosomiasis patients | Paragonimiasis patients | Clonorchiasis patients | Score | |
| ELISA1 | 0 | 60 | 40 | 35 | 76.5 |
| ELISA2 | 20 | 62 | 65 | 35 | 66.7 |
| ELISA3 | 0 | 32 | 10 | 5 | - |
| ELISA4 | 0 | 60 | 25 | 25 | 79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ELISA6 | 0 | 92 | 85 | 0 | 86.7 |
| ELISA7 | 0 | 90 | 30 | 0 | 90.5 |
| ELISA8 | 3.3 | 92 | 95 | 15 | 83 |
| IHA1 | 0 | 92 | 55 | 0 | 89.7 |
| IHA2 | 3.3 | 94 | 75 | 10 | 85.2 |
| IHA3 | 0 | 90 | 40 | 5 | 89 |
| IHA4 | 3.3 | 92 | 60 | 0 | 88 |
| IHA5 | 3.3 | 52 | 30 | 5 | - |
| IHA6 | 6.7 | 36 | 20 | 0 | 71.3 |
| LA | 3.3 | 78 | 80 | 0 | 81.1 |
| DIGFA | 20 | 86 | 45 | 25 | 80.1 |
ELISA1, 2, 3 for detection of schistosome antigens with monoclonal antibodies; ELISA 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 for detection of anti-schistosome antibodies with crude schistosome antigens except ELISA 5 which used the 107–121 kDa fraction antigens; IHA for detection of anti-schistosome antibodies with crude schistosome antigens; LA (latex agglutination) for detection of anti-schistosome antibodies with crude schistosome antigens DIGFA for detection of anti-schistosome antibodies with crude schistosome antigens.
ELISA 3 and IHA 5 were not scored due to certain technical errors during the test.