Literature DB >> 25872889

FIGO's staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: abridged republication.

Jaime Prat1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25872889      PMCID: PMC4397237          DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.2.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 2005-0380            Impact factor:   4.401


× No keyword cloud information.
Over the past quarter of a century, several scientific developments have challenged traditional concepts in ovarian cancer. First, it was recognized that ovarian cancer is not a homogeneous disease, but rather a group of diseases-each with different morphology and biological behavior. Approximately 90% of ovarian cancers are carcinomas (malignant epithelial tumors) and, based on histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetic analysis, at least five main types are currently distinguished: high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC, 70%); endometrioid carcinoma (EC,10%); clear-cell carcinoma (CCC,10%); mucinous carcinoma (MC, 3%); and low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC, <5%) [1,2]. These tumor types (which account for 98% of ovarian carcinomas) can be reproducibly diagnosed by light microscopy and are inherently different diseases, as indicated by differences in epidemiologic and genetic risk factors; precursor lesions; patterns of spread; and molecular events during oncogenesis, response to chemotherapy, and prognosis [2,3]. Much less common are malignant germ cell tumors and potentially malignant sex cord-stromal tumors. The biomarker expression profile within a given histotype is consistent across stages. Ovarian cancers differ primarily based on histologic type. In the era of personalized cancer medicine, reproducible histopathologic diagnosis of tumor cell type is a sine qua non for successful treatment. Different tumor histotypes respond differently to chemotherapy. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) Committee on Gynecologic Oncology unanimously agreed that histologic type should be designated at staging. The finding of high-grade serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC), in patients with BRCA mutation undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO)[4] also influenced the new FIGO staging. Although STIC is capable of metastasizing and, therefore, cannot be considered a true carcinoma in situ , compelling evidence for a tubal origin of BRCA-positive HGSC has accumulated over the past decade [5,6]. The relative proportion of HGSCs of ovarian and tubal derivation is unknown, mainly because tumor growth in advanced-stage cancers conceals the primary site. Even in cases involving BRCA mutation, evidence of a tubal origin of HGSCs is incomplete and a multicentric origin of these tumors cannot be excluded. The process of the proposed changes to the staging of ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer started three years ago under the leadership of the Chair of the FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology, Professor Lynette Denny. The proposal was sent to all relevant gynecologic oncology organizations and societies worldwide. The new staging was reached by consensus of those participating in the FIGO meeting held in Rome, Italy, on October 7, 2012 and approved two weeks later. The following is the consensus agreement that resulted from these efforts and represents new criteria for staging of these gynecologic cancer (Table 1).
Table 1

2014 FIGO ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer staging system and corresponding TNM

Stage I. Tumor confined to ovaries or fallopian tube(s)
T1-N0-M0
IA: tumor limited to one ovary (capsule intact) or fallopian tube; no tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface; no malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings
  T1a-N0-M0
IB: tumor limited to both ovaries (capsules intact) or fallopian tubes; no tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface; no malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings
  T1b-N0-M0
IC: tumor limited to one or both ovaries or fallopian tubes, with any of the following:
 IC1: surgical spill
  T1c1-N0-M0
 IC2: capsule ruptured before surgery or tumor on ovarian or fallopian tube surface
  T1c2-N0-M0
 IC3: malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings
  T1c3-N0-M0
Stage II. Tumor involves one or both ovaries or fallopian tubes with pelvic extension (below pelvic brim) or primary peritoneal cancer
T2-N0-M0
IIA: extension and/or implants on uterus and/or fallopian tubes and/or ovaries
  T2a-N0-M0
IIB: extension to other pelvic intraperitoneal tissues
  T2b-N0-M0
Stage III. Tumor involves one or both ovaries or fallopian tubes, or primary peritoneal cancer, with cytologically or histologically confirmed spread to the peritoneum outside the pelvis and/or metastasis to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes
T1/T2-N1-M0
IIIA1: positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes only (cytologically or histologically proven):
  IIIA1(i) Metastasis up to 10 mm in greatest dimension
  IIIA1(ii) Metastasis more than 10 mm in greatest dimension
IIIA2: microscopic extrapelvic (above the pelvic brim) peritoneal involvement with or without positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes
  T3a2-N0/N1-M0
IIIB: macroscopic peritoneal metastasis beyond the pelvis up to 2 cm in greatest dimension, with or without metastasis to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes
  T3b-N0/N1-M0
IIIC: macroscopic peritoneal metastasis beyond the pelvis more than 2 cm in greatest dimension, with or without metastasis to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (includes extension of tumor to capsule of liver and spleen without parenchymal involvement of either organ)
  T3c-N0/N1-M0
Stage IV. Distant metastasis excluding peritoneal metastases
Stage IVA: pleural effusion with positive cytology
Stage IVB: parenchymal metastases and metastases to extra-abdominal organs (including inguinal lymph nodes and lymph nodes outside of the abdominal cavity)
Any T, any N, M1

MAIN CHANGES

The primary site (i.e., ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum) should be designated where possible. In some cases, it might not be possible to delineate the primary site clearly; such cases should be listed as "undesignated". The histologic type should be recorded. Stage I ovarian or fallopian tube cancer is confined to the ovaries or the fallopian tubes and peritoneal fluid/washings. Tumor rupture, surface involvement by tumor cells or presence of malignant cells in the ascites or peritoneal washings warrants a stage of IC. It is not possible to have stage I peritoneal cancer. Stage II ovarian cancer comprises a small and heterogeneous group making up less than 10% of ovarian cancers. It is defined as extension or metastasis to extraovarian/extratubal pelvic organs and may include curable tumors that have directly extended to adjacent organs but have not yet metastasized, as well as tumors that have seeded the pelvic peritoneum by metastasis and, therefore, have a poor prognosis. The Committee felt that subdividing this small category further into IIB1 and IIB2 (i.e., microscopic and macroscopic pelvic peritoneal metastases) was not based on evidence/biology. All stage II disease is treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, so subclassification is not essential. Also, the old substage IIC (i.e., IIA or IIB but with tumor on surface, capsule ruptured, or ascites or positive peritoneal washing) was considered redundant and eliminated. Most ovarian cancers are HGSCs that usually present in stage III, with the vast majority (84%) stage IIIC [7]. These tumors characteristically spread along peritoneal surfaces involving both pelvic and abdominal peritoneum. Less than 10% of ovarian carcinomas extend beyond the pelvis with exclusively retroperitoneal lymph node involvement. Evidence in the literature indicates that these cases have a better prognosis than that of tumors with abdominal peritoneal involvement [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The new staging includes a revision of stage III patients and assignment to stage IIIA1 based on spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes without intraperitoneal dissemination. Stage IIIA1 is further subdivided into IIIA1(i) (metastasis ≤10 mm in greatest dimension) and IIIA1(ii) (metastasis >10 mm in greatest dimension), even if there are no retrospective data supporting quantification of the size of metastasis in IIIA1. Involvement of retroperitoneal lymph nodes must be proven cytologically or histologically. Stage IV is defined as distant metastasis and includes patients with parenchymal liver/splenic metastases and extra-abdominal metastases; 12% to 21% of patients present with stage IV disease [7]. Extension of tumor from omentum to spleen or liver (stage IIIC) should be differentiated from isolated parenchymal metastases (stage IVB).
  13 in total

1.  Stage IIIC ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma: a heterogeneous group of patients with different prognoses.

Authors:  Rania Bakkar; David Gershenson; Patricia Fox; Kim Vu; Maryam Zenali; Elvio Silva
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Intraepithelial carcinoma of the fimbria and pelvic serous carcinoma: Evidence for a causal relationship.

Authors:  David W Kindelberger; Yonghee Lee; Alexander Miron; Michelle S Hirsch; Colleen Feltmate; Fabiola Medeiros; Michael J Callahan; Elizabeth O Garner; Robert W Gordon; Chandler Birch; Ross S Berkowitz; Michael G Muto; Christopher P Crum
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Ovarian cancer patients with "node-positive-only" Stage IIIC disease have a more favorable outcome than Stage IIIA/B.

Authors:  G Ferrandina; G Scambia; F Legge; M Petrillo; V Salutari
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Dysplastic changes in prophylactically removed Fallopian tubes of women predisposed to developing ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J M Piek; P J van Diest; R P Zweemer; J W Jansen; R J Poort-Keesom; F H Menko; J J Gille; A P Jongsma; G Pals; P Kenemans; R H Verheijen
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Angelo Maggioni; Neville Hacker; Fabio Landoni; Sven Ackermann; Elio Campagnutta; Karl Tamussino; Raimund Winter; Antonio Pellegrino; Stefano Greggi; Roberto Angioli; Natalina Manci; Giovanni Scambia; Tiziana Dell'Anna; Roldano Fossati; Irene Floriani; Rita S Rossi; Roberto Grassi; Giuseppe Favalli; Francesco Raspagliesi; Diana Giannarelli; Luca Martella; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The validity and significance of substage IIIC by node involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer: impact of nodal metastasis on patient survival.

Authors:  K Kanazawa; T Suzuki; M Tokashiki
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  Ovarian carcinomas: five distinct diseases with different origins, genetic alterations, and clinicopathological features.

Authors:  Jaime Prat
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Primary fallopian tube malignancies in BRCA-positive women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  Michael J Callahan; Christopher P Crum; Fabiola Medeiros; David W Kindelberger; Julia A Elvin; Judy E Garber; Colleen M Feltmate; Ross S Berkowitz; Michael G Muto
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Patients with ovarian carcinoma upstaged to stage III after systematic lymphadenctomy have similar survival to Stage I/II patients and superior survival to other Stage III patients.

Authors:  T Onda; H Yoshikawa; T Yasugi; M Mishima; S Nakagawa; M Yamada; K Matsumoto; Y Taketani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer classified solely by lymph node metastasis has a more favorable prognosis than other types of stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Su-Jin Baek; Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 4.401

View more
  76 in total

1.  Ultrasound Features Improve Diagnostic Performance of Ovarian Cancer Predictors in Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors.

Authors:  Yong-Ning Chen; Fei Ma; Ya-di Zhang; Li Chen; Chan-Yuan Li; Shi-Peng Gong
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-13

2.  Targeted next-generation sequencing for molecular diagnosis of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tze-Kiong Er; Yu-Fa Su; Chun-Chieh Wu; Chih-Chieh Chen; Jing Wang; Tsung-Hua Hsieh; Marta Herreros-Villanueva; Wan-Tzu Chen; Yi-Ting Chen; Ta-Chih Liu; Hung-Sheng Chen; Eing-Mei Tsai
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Enhancing delivery of small molecule and cell-based therapies for ovarian cancer using advanced delivery strategies.

Authors:  Joanne O'Dwyer; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Robert Wylie; Saoirse O'Mahony; Michael O'Dwyer; Garry P Duffy; Eimear B Dolan
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2020-08-16

4.  Serous Tubal Carcinogenesis: The Recent Concept of Origin of Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal and Fallopian Tube High-Grade Serous Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tushar Kar; Asaranti Kar; Ipsita Dhal; Sasmita Panda; Priyadarshini Biswal; Bhagyalaxmi Nayak; Niranjan Rout; Sagarika Samantray
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-06-01

5.  Thrombotic events induce the worse prognosis in ovarian carcinomas and frequently develop in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuki Takasaki; Morikazu Miyamoto; Masashi Takano; Hiroaki Soyama; Tadashi Aoyama; Hiroko Matsuura; Hideki Iwahashi; Hiroki Ishibashi; Takahiro Sakamoto; Kenichi Furuya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Polymorphic variants in the vitamin D pathway genes and the risk of ovarian cancer among non-carriers of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Adrianna Mostowska; Stefan Sajdak; Piotr Pawlik; Margarita Lianeri; Paweł P Jagodzinski
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Magnetic resonance relaxometry improves the accuracy of conventional MRI in the diagnosis of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer: A case report.

Authors:  Sho Matsubara; Naoki Kawahara; Akihito Horie; Ryusuke Murakami; Naoki Horikawa; Daichi Sumida; Takuya Wada; Tomoka Maehana; Aika Yamawaki; Mayuko Ichikawa; Chiharu Yoshimoto; Masaki Mandai; Hiroshi Kobayashi
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-07-01

8.  Lymphoma of the female genital tract: a clinicopatholngical analysis of 25 cases.

Authors:  Jingping Wang; Linggong Zeng; Shoukang Chen; Qiong Wu; Li Ma; Shiwu Wu; Z Peter Wang; Yisheng Tao; Damin Chai
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

9.  MiR-200c-3p Contrasts PD-L1 Induction by Combinatorial Therapies and Slows Proliferation of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer through Downregulation of β-Catenin and c-Myc.

Authors:  Eleni Anastasiadou; Elena Messina; Tiziana Sanavia; Lucia Mundo; Federica Farinella; Stefano Lazzi; Francesca Megiorni; Simona Ceccarelli; Paola Pontecorvi; Francesco Marampon; Cira Rosaria Tiziana Di Gioia; Giorgia Perniola; Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Lorenzo Leoncini; Pankaj Trivedi; Andrea Lenzi; Cinzia Marchese
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Unfolded protein response, a link between endometrioid ovarian carcinoma and endometriosis: A pilot study.

Authors:  Andrea Ciavattini; Giovanni Delli Carpini; Matteo Serri; Alessandra Tozzi; Francesca Leoni; Eugenia Di Loreto; Franca Saccucci
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.