Literature DB >> 15840878

Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Pierluigi Benedetti Panici1, Angelo Maggioni, Neville Hacker, Fabio Landoni, Sven Ackermann, Elio Campagnutta, Karl Tamussino, Raimund Winter, Antonio Pellegrino, Stefano Greggi, Roberto Angioli, Natalina Manci, Giovanni Scambia, Tiziana Dell'Anna, Roldano Fossati, Irene Floriani, Rita S Rossi, Roberto Grassi, Giuseppe Favalli, Francesco Raspagliesi, Diana Giannarelli, Luca Martella, Costantino Mangioni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer is unclear and has not been addressed by randomized studies. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy improves progression-free and overall survival compared with resection of bulky nodes only.
METHODS: From January 1991 through May 2003, 427 eligible patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB-C and IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were randomly assigned to undergo systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n = 216) or resection of bulky nodes only (n = 211). Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using a log-rank statistic and a Cox multivariable regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 68.4 months, 292 events (i.e., recurrences or deaths) were observed, and 202 patients had died. Sites of first recurrences were similar in both arms. The adjusted risk for first event was statistically significantly lower in the systematic lymphadenectomy arm (hazard ratio [HR] = .75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59 to 0.94; P = .01) than in the no-lymphadenectomy arm, corresponding to 5-year progression-free survival rates of 31.2 and 21.6% in the systematic lymphadenectomy and control arms, respectively (difference = 9.6%, 95% CI = 1.5% to 21.6%), and to median progression-free survival of 29.4 and 22.4 months, respectively (difference = 7 months, 95% CI = 1.0 to 14.4 months). The risk of death was similar in both arms (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.29; P = .85), corresponding to 5-year overall survival rates of 48.5 and 47%, respectively (difference = 1.5%, 95% CI = -8.4% to 10.6%), and to median overall survival of 58.7 and 56.3 months, respectively (difference = 2.4 months, 95% CI = -11.8 to 21.0 months). Median operating time was longer, and the percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions was higher in the systematic lymphadenectomy arm than in the no-lymphadenectomy arm (300 versus 210 minutes, P<.001, and 72% versus 59%; P = .006, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Systematic lymphadenectomy improves progression-free but not overall survival in women with optimally debulked advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15840878     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  73 in total

1.  Impact of Lymph Node Sampling in Stage II and III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with Clinically Negative Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Mohamed Ibrahim Fahim; Abdelmaksoud Mohamed Ali; Rasha Mahmoud Allam
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02

2.  [Therapeutic standards for ovarian cancer].

Authors:  J Pfisterer; A du Bois
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 3.  Management of retroperitoneal lymph nodes in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kimio Ushijima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group.

Authors:  Takafumi Oshita; Hiroaki Itamochi; Ryuichiro Nishimura; Fumitaka Numa; Kazuhiro Takehara; Masamichi Hiura; Hirotoshi Tanimoto; Jun Noma; Ryoji Hayase; Akihiro Murakami; Hideo Fujimoto; Yasunobu Kanamori; Fuminori Kitada; Keiji Shitsukawa; Makoto Nagaji; Yukihisa Minagawa; Michihisa Fujiwara; Junzo Kigawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Prognosis and conditional disease-free survival among patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Michelle L Kurta; Robert P Edwards; Kirsten B Moysich; Kathleen McDonough; Marnie Bertolet; Joel L Weissfeld; Janet M Catov; Francesmary Modugno; Clareann H Bunker; Roberta B Ness; Brenda Diergaarde
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Prevalence and distribution pattern of nodal metastases in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Bachmann; Robert Bachmann; Bernhard Kraemer; Sara Yvonne Brucker; Anette Staebler; Falko Fend; Ralf Rothmund; Diethelm Wallwiener
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-05

7.  Lymphocele and ovarian cancer: risk factors and impact on survival.

Authors:  Tristan Gauthier; Catherine Uzan; Delphine Lefeuvre; Aminata Kane; Geoffroy Canlorbe; Fredéric Deschamps; Catherine Lhomme; Patricia Pautier; Philippe Morice; Sébastien Gouy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-06-15

8.  Nodal status--its impact on prognosis in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  C Bachmann; S Bachmann; T Fehm; A Staebler; S Becker; R Rothmund; C Gardanis; E M Grischke; D Wallwiener; E F Solomayer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Cancer: Is It Still Justified?

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Andrea Giannini; Margherita Fischetti; Francesca Lecce; Violante Di Donato
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  In vitro extreme drug resistance assay to taxanes or platinum compounds for the prediction of clinical outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hee Seung Kim; Tae Joong Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung; Jae Weon Kim; Byung Gie Kim; Noh Hyun Park; Yong Sang Song; Duk Soo Bae; Soon Beom Kang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.