Literature DB >> 17052746

Is it justified to classify patients to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer based on nodal involvement only?

William A Cliby1, Giovanni D Aletti, Timothy O Wilson, Karl C Podratz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer is generally associated with upper abdominal tumor implants of greater than 2 cm and carries a grave prognosis. A subset of patients is upstaged to Stage IIIC because of lymph node metastases, in which prognosis is not well defined. We undertook this study to describe the clinical behavior of occult Stage IIIC.
METHODS: All consecutive patients found to have Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer during a 9-year period (1994-2002) were analyzed for surgical procedures, pathology, and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were upstaged to Stage IIIC by virtue of positive nodes. Nine had small volume upper abdominal disease (IIIA/B before upstaging), 15 had disease limited to the pelvis and 12 had disease confined to the ovaries. 32/36 patients had no gross residual disease at the conclusion of surgery. The 5-year DFS and OS survivals were 52% and 76% respectively, for all patients. We observed no significant difference in outcomes between patients upstaged from IIIA/B versus I-II stage disease. The outcomes were superior to a control group of patients cytoreduced to either no gross RD or RD<1 cm, who had large volume upper abdominal disease at beginning of surgery (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients upstaged to Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer for node involvement have an excellent 5-year OS relative to all patients with Stage IIIC disease. These data demonstrate the necessity for stratifying patients classified as having Stage IIIC disease based solely on nodal disease when comparing outcomes. This information is particularly valuable when counseling patients regarding prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17052746     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.08.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  17 in total

Review 1.  Management of retroperitoneal lymph nodes in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Kimio Ushijima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Clinical impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy for pT1 and pT2 ovarian cancer: a retrospective survey by the Sankai Gynecology Study Group.

Authors:  Takafumi Oshita; Hiroaki Itamochi; Ryuichiro Nishimura; Fumitaka Numa; Kazuhiro Takehara; Masamichi Hiura; Hirotoshi Tanimoto; Jun Noma; Ryoji Hayase; Akihiro Murakami; Hideo Fujimoto; Yasunobu Kanamori; Fuminori Kitada; Keiji Shitsukawa; Makoto Nagaji; Yukihisa Minagawa; Michihisa Fujiwara; Junzo Kigawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 3.  Eighth Edition of the UICC Classification of Malignant Tumours: an overview of the changes in the pathological TNM classification criteria-What has changed and why?

Authors:  Luca Bertero; Federica Massa; Jasna Metovic; Roberto Zanetti; Isabella Castellano; Umberto Ricardi; Mauro Papotti; Paola Cassoni
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Revised FIGO staging system for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: important implications for radiologists.

Authors:  Tsukasa Saida; Yumiko Oishi Tanaka; Koji Matsumoto; Toyomi Satoh; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa; Manabu Minami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  What is the role of retroperitoneal exploration in optimally debulked stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data study.

Authors:  Bunja J Rungruang; Austin Miller; Thomas C Krivak; Neil S Horowitz; Noah Rodriguez; Chad A Hamilton; Floor J Backes; Linda F Carson; Michael Friedlander; David G Mutch; Michael J Goodheart; Krishnansu S Tewari; Robert M Wenham; Michael A Bookman; G Larry Maxwell; Scott D Richard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Validity of the 2014 FIGO Stage IIIA1 Subclassification for Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Peritoneal Cancers.

Authors:  Ayumu Matsuoka; Shinichi Tate; Kyoko Nishikimi; Masami Iwamoto; Satoyo Otsuka; Makio Shozu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer classified solely by lymph node metastasis has a more favorable prognosis than other types of stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Su-Jin Baek; Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 4.401

8.  [New FIGO classification of ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer].

Authors:  A K Höhn; J Einenkel; C Wittekind; L-C Horn
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.011

9.  Outcome in Advanced Ovarian Cancer following an Appropriate and Comprehensive Effort at Upfront Cytoreduction: A Twenty-Year Experience in a Single Cancer Institute.

Authors:  Anne Marszalek; Séverine Alran; Suzy Scholl; Virginie Fourchotte; Corinne Plancher; Christophe Rosty; Jean Philippe Meyniel; Vincent De Margerie; Thierry Dorval; Anne De La Rochefordière; Paul Cottu; Peter Petrow; Xavier Sastre-Garrau; Rémy Jacques Salmon
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-25

10.  Epithelial ovarian cancer relapsing as isolated lymph node disease: natural history and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Francesco Legge; Marco Petrillo; Vincenzo Adamo; Salvatore Pisconti; Giovanni Scambia; Gabriella Ferrandina
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.