Literature DB >> 25870111

SMAD1 and SMAD5 Expression Is Coordinately Regulated by FLI1 and GATA2 during Endothelial Development.

Jonathon Marks-Bluth1, Anchit Khanna2, Vashe Chandrakanthan2, Julie Thoms2, Thomas Bee2, Christina Eich3, Young Chan Kang2, Kathy Knezevic2, Qiao Qiao2, Simon Fitch4, Leif Oxburgh5, Katrin Ottersbach4, Elaine Dzierzak6, Marella F T R de Bruijn7, John E Pimanda8.   

Abstract

The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)/SMAD signaling pathway is a critical regulator of angiogenic sprouting and is involved in vascular development in the embryo. SMAD1 and SMAD5, the core mediators of BMP signaling, are vital for this activity, yet little is known about their transcriptional regulation in endothelial cells. Here, we have integrated multispecies sequence conservation, tissue-specific chromatin, in vitro reporter assay, and in vivo transgenic data to identify and validate Smad1+63 and the Smad5 promoter as tissue-specific cis-regulatory elements that are active in the developing endothelium. The activity of these elements in the endothelium was dependent on highly conserved ETS, GATA, and E-box motifs, and chromatin immunoprecipitation showed high levels of enrichment of FLI1, GATA2, and SCL at these sites in endothelial cell lines and E11 dorsal aortas in vivo. Knockdown of FLI1 and GATA2 but not SCL reduced the expression of SMAD1 and SMAD5 in endothelial cells in vitro. In contrast, CD31(+) cKit(-) endothelial cells harvested from embryonic day 9 (E9) aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) regions of GATA2 null embryos showed reduced Smad1 but not Smad5 transcript levels. This is suggestive of a degree of in vivo selection where, in the case of reduced SMAD1 levels, endothelial cells with more robust SMAD5 expression have a selective advantage.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25870111      PMCID: PMC4438244          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00239-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  39 in total

1.  Epigenetically coordinated GATA2 binding is necessary for endothelium-specific endomucin expression.

Authors:  Yasuharu Kanki; Takahide Kohro; Shuying Jiang; Shuichi Tsutsumi; Imari Mimura; Jun-Ichi Suehiro; Youichiro Wada; Yoshihiro Ohta; Sigeo Ihara; Hiroko Iwanari; Makoto Naito; Takao Hamakubo; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Tatsuhiko Kodama; Takashi Minami
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Stalk cell phenotype depends on integration of Notch and Smad1/5 signaling cascades.

Authors:  Iván M Moya; Lieve Umans; Elke Maas; Paulo N G Pereira; Karen Beets; Annick Francis; Ward Sents; Elizabeth J Robertson; Christine L Mummery; Danny Huylebroeck; An Zwijsen
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 3.  Regulation of endothelial cell development by ETS transcription factors.

Authors:  Stryder M Meadows; Candace T Myers; Paul A Krieg
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  A Runx1-Smad6 rheostat controls Runx1 activity during embryonic hematopoiesis.

Authors:  Kathy Knezevic; Thomas Bee; Nicola K Wilson; Mary E Janes; Sarah Kinston; Stéphanie Polderdijk; Anja Kolb-Kokocinski; Katrin Ottersbach; Niv Pencovich; Yoram Groner; Marella de Bruijn; Berthold Göttgens; John E Pimanda
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Molecular control of endothelial cell behaviour during blood vessel morphogenesis.

Authors:  Shane P Herbert; Didier Y R Stainier
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  Genetic framework for GATA factor function in vascular biology.

Authors:  Amelia K Linnemann; Henriette O'Geen; Sunduz Keles; Peggy J Farnham; Emery H Bresnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Hemorrhage, impaired hematopoiesis, and lethality in mouse embryos carrying a targeted disruption of the Fli1 transcription factor.

Authors:  D D Spyropoulos; P N Pharr; K R Lavenburg; P Jackers; T S Papas; M Ogawa; D K Watson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis.

Authors:  Peter Carmeliet; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  The regulation of TGFbeta signal transduction.

Authors:  Aristidis Moustakas; Carl-Henrik Heldin
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.868

10.  ChIP-seq reveals cell type-specific binding patterns of BMP-specific Smads and a novel binding motif.

Authors:  Masato Morikawa; Daizo Koinuma; Shuichi Tsutsumi; Eleftheria Vasilaki; Yasuharu Kanki; Carl-Henrik Heldin; Hiroyuki Aburatani; Kohei Miyazono
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  3 in total

1.  Heterozygous variants in GATA2 contribute to DCML deficiency in mice by disrupting tandem protein binding.

Authors:  Atsushi Hasegawa; Yuki Hayasaka; Masanobu Morita; Yuta Takenaka; Yuna Hosaka; Ikuo Hirano; Masayuki Yamamoto; Ritsuko Shimizu
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-04-19

2.  MicroRNA-93-5p may participate in the formation of morphine tolerance in bone cancer pain mouse model by targeting Smad5.

Authors:  Wen-Feng Xiao; Yu-Sheng Li; Wei Lou; Ting Cai; Shun Zhang; Xiao-Ying Hu; Xing-Wang Zhang; Wei Luo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-09

Review 3.  The Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Cistrome: GATA Factor-Dependent cis-Regulatory Mechanisms.

Authors:  K J Hewitt; K D Johnson; X Gao; S Keles; E H Bresnick
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.897

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.