Literature DB >> 25868876

Safety and performance of a novel embolic deflection device in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the DEFLECT I study.

Andreas Baumbach1, Michael Mullen, Adam M Brickman, Suneil K Aggarwal, Cody G Pietras, John K Forrest, David Hildick-Smith, Stephanie M Meller, Louise Gambone, Peter den Heijer, Pauliina Margolis, Szilard Voros, Alexandra J Lansky.   

Abstract

AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the safety and performance of the TriGuard™ Embolic Deflection Device (EDD), a nitinol mesh filter positioned in the aortic arch across all three major cerebral artery take-offs to deflect emboli away from the cerebral circulation, in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND
RESULTS: The prospective, multicentre DEFLECT I study (NCT01448421) enrolled 37 consecutive subjects undergoing TAVR with the TriGuard EDD. Subjects underwent clinical and cognitive follow-up to 30 days; cerebral diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) was performed pre-procedure and at 4±2 days post procedure. The device performed as intended with successful cerebral coverage in 80% (28/35) of cases. The primary safety endpoint (in-hospital EDD device- or EDD procedure-related cardiovascular mortality, major stroke disability, life-threatening bleeding, distal embolisation, major vascular complications, or need for acute cardiac surgery) occurred in 8.1% of subjects (VARC-defined two life-threatening bleeds and one vascular complication). The presence of new cerebral ischaemic lesions on post-procedure DW-MRI (n=28) was similar to historical controls (82% vs. 76%, p=NS). However, an exploratory analysis found that per-patient total lesion volume was 34% lower than reported historical data (0.2 vs. 0.3 cm3), and 89% lower in patients with complete (n=17) versus incomplete (n=10) cerebral vessel coverage (0.05 vs. 0.45 cm3, p=0.016).
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the first-generation TriGuard EDD during TAVR is safe, and device performance was successful in 80% of cases during the highest embolic-risk portions of the TAVR procedure. The potential of the TriGuard EDD to reduce total cerebral ischaemic burden merits further randomised investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25868876     DOI: 10.4244/EIJY15M04_01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  9 in total

Review 1.  Cerebral embolic protection devices during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: clinical versus silent embolism.

Authors:  Luis Nombela-Franco; German Armijo; Gabriela Tirado-Conte
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Cerebral protection devices for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Hector Cubero-Gallego; Isaac Pascual; José Rozado; Ana Ayesta; Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Rocio Diaz; Alberto Alperi; Pablo Avanzas; Cesar Moris
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

3.  Need for Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: An Interventionalist's Perspective on Histopathology Findings.

Authors:  Herbert G Kroon; Nicolas Mda Van Mieghem
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-05

Review 4.  The Role of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Ozan M Demir; Gianmarco Iannopollo; Antonio Mangieri; Marco B Ancona; Damiano Regazzoli; Satoru Mitomo; Antonio Colombo; Giora Weisz; Azeem Latib
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-10-23

Review 5.  Cerebral Embolic Protection in TAVI: Friend or Foe.

Authors:  Michael Teitelbaum; Rafail A Kotronias; Luciano A Sposato; Rodrigo Bagur
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2019-02

6.  "Tailor-made" Total Cerebral Protection during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Keita Suzuki; Masaomi Koyanagi; Shinichi Shirai; Hideo Chihara; Takenori Ogura; Takahiro Kamata; Taisuke Kitamura; Kenji Ando; Taketo Hatano
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Embolic Protection with the TriGuard 3 System in Nonagenarian Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Alexander Lind; Rolf Alexander Jánosi; Matthias Totzeck; Arjang Ruhparwar; Tienush Rassaf; Fadi Al-Rashid
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Reduction of Cerebral Emboli: In vitro Study with a Novel Cerebral Embolic Protection Device.

Authors:  Guy Haiman; Tamim Nazif; Jeffrey W Moses; Amit Ashkenazi; Pauliina Margolis; Alexandra J Lansky
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2020-03-12

Review 9.  Cerebral Protection Devices during Transcatheter Interventions: Indications, Benefits, and Limitations.

Authors:  Stephan Haussig; Axel Linke; Norman Mangner
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.931

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.