Literature DB >> 32210643

Reduction of Cerebral Emboli: In vitro Study with a Novel Cerebral Embolic Protection Device.

Guy Haiman1, Tamim Nazif2, Jeffrey W Moses2, Amit Ashkenazi1, Pauliina Margolis1, Alexandra J Lansky3,4.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the efficacy of the TriGUARD 3™, a novel cerebral embolic protection (CEP) device in reducing cerebral embolization by deflecting embolic debris away from the cerebral circulation using a quantitative in vitro model. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This in vitro study assessed the ability of a cerebral embolic protection device to deflect embolic debris, by measuring the percent of particles and air bubbles, 200 µm and 300 µm in size, from entering the cerebral circulation compared to unprotected controls. A 3D printed silicone model of the ascending aorta, the aortic arch with its three major cerebral arteries and the descending aorta was connected to a custom-made simulator that mimics physiological pulsatile flow patterns of the left ventricle. Comparative analyses were used to assess the efficacy of the cerebral embolic protection device to deflect particles and air bubbles away from the major cerebral arteries. The percent of particles and air bubbles entering the major cerebral arteries was significantly lower with cerebral embolic protection compared to unprotected controls (p<0.0001). Cerebral protection resulted in 97.4-100% reduction in air bubble counts, and 97.4-97.8% reduction in particle counts compared to unprotected controls.
CONCLUSION: This in vitro study used simulated physiologic flow conditions in an aortic arch model to demonstrate >97% efficacy of the TriGUARD 3 CEP device, in reducing cerebral embolization of particulate and air bubbles of 200 µm to 300 µm in size.
© 2020 Haiman et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CEP; TAVR; cerebral embolic protection device; deflection filter; in vitro simulator; in vitro study; trans-catheter aortic valve replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32210643      PMCID: PMC7075333          DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S234961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)        ISSN: 1179-1470


  17 in total

1.  First-in-man use of a novel embolic protection device for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Christoph K Naber; Alexander Ghanem; Alexander A Abizaid; Alexander Wolf; Jan-Malte Sinning; Nikos Werner; Georg Nickenig; Thomas Schmitz; Eberhard Grube
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 6.534

2.  Filter-based cerebral embolic protection with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the randomised MISTRAL-C trial.

Authors:  Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Lennart van Gils; Habib Ahmad; Floortje van Kesteren; Hendrik W van der Werf; Guus Brueren; Michiel Storm; Mattie Lenzen; Joost Daemen; Ad F M van den Heuvel; Pim Tonino; Jan Baan; Peter J Koudstaal; Marguerite E I Schipper; Aad van der Lugt; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Cerebral embolism following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of transfemoral and transapical approaches.

Authors:  Josep Rodés-Cabau; Eric Dumont; Robert H Boone; Eric Larose; Rodrigo Bagur; Ronen Gurvitch; Fernand Bédard; Daniel Doyle; Robert De Larochellière; Cleonie Jayasuria; Jacques Villeneuve; Alier Marrero; Mélanie Côté; Philippe Pibarot; John G Webb
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Perioperative stroke.

Authors:  Magdy Selim
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Stroke and encephalopathy after cardiac surgery: an update.

Authors:  Guy M McKhann; Maura A Grega; Louis M Borowicz; William A Baumgartner; Ola A Selnes
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  In-hospital complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation revisited according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions.

Authors:  Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolo Piazza; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Amber M Otten; Apostolos Tzikas; Carl J Schultz; Robert van der Boon; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Ron T van Domburg; Peter J Koudstaal; Arie Pieter Kappetein; Patrick W Serruys; Peter P de Jaegere
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Stroke as a complication of cardiac catheterization: risk factors and clinical features.

Authors:  A Z Segal; W B Abernethy; I F Palacios; R BeLue; G Rordorf
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-04-10       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Effect of a Cerebral Protection Device on Brain Lesions Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The CLEAN-TAVI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stephan Haussig; Norman Mangner; Michael G Dwyer; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Christian Lücke; Felix Woitek; David M Holzhey; Friedrich W Mohr; Matthias Gutberlet; Robert Zivadinov; Gerhard Schuler; Axel Linke
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary interventions: incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications.

Authors:  Shmuel Fuchs; Eugenio Stabile; Timothy D Kinnaird; Gary S Mintz; Luis Gruberg; Daniel A Canos; Ellen E Pinnow; Ran Kornowski; William O Suddath; Lowell F Satler; Augusto D Pichard; Kenneth M Kent; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-07-02       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  Heyder Omran; Harald Schmidt; Matthias Hackenbroch; Stefan Illien; Peter Bernhardt; Giso von der Recke; Rolf Fimmers; Sebastian Flacke; Günter Layer; Christoph Pohl; Berndt Lüderitz; Hans Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.