Literature DB >> 25868510

The position of strontium ranelate in today's management of osteoporosis.

J-Y Reginster1, M-L Brandi2, J Cannata-Andía3, C Cooper4, B Cortet5, J-M Feron6, H Genant7, S Palacios8, J D Ringe9, R Rizzoli10.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis accounts for about 3 % of total European health-care spending. The low proportion of costs for the pharmacological prevention of osteoporotic fracture means that it is highly cost saving, especially in patient with severe osteoporosis or patients who cannot take certain osteoporosis medications due to issues of contraindications or tolerability. Following recent regulatory changes, strontium ranelate is now indicated in patients with severe osteoporosis for whom treatment with other osteoporosis treatments is not possible, and without contraindications including uncontrolled hypertension, established, current or past history of ischaemic heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease. We review here today's evidence for the safety and efficacy of strontium ranelate. The efficacy of strontium ranelate in patients complying with the new prescribing information (i.e. severe osteoporosis without contraindications) has been explored in a multivariate analysis of clinical trial data, which concluded that the antifracture efficacy of strontium ranelate is maintained in patients with severe osteoporosis without contraindications and also demonstrated how the new target population mitigates risk. Strontium ranelate is therefore an important alternative in today's management of osteoporosis, with a positive benefit-risk balance, provided that the revised indication and contraindications are followed and cardiovascular risk is monitored. The bone community should be reassured that there remain viable alternatives in patients in whom treatment with other agents is not possible and protection against the debilitating effects of fracture is still feasible in patients with severe osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficacy; Osteoporosis; Safety; Strontium ranelate; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25868510     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3109-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  18 in total

1.  Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; E Seeman; M C De Vernejoul; S Adami; J Compston; C Phenekos; J P Devogelaer; M Diaz Curiel; A Sawicki; S Goemaere; O H Sorensen; D Felsenberg; P J Meunier
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Strontium ranelate lives to fight another day.

Authors:  Juliet Compston
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Silvia M Evers; Wafa Ben Sedrine; John A Kanis; Bram Ramaekers; Jean-Yves Reginster; Stuart Silverman; Caroline E Wyers; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Nationwide registry-based analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and adverse outcomes in patients treated with strontium ranelate.

Authors:  B Abrahamsen; E L Grove; P Vestergaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Comparative gastrointestinal safety of bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Tadrous; L Wong; M M Mamdani; D N Juurlink; M D Krahn; L E Lévesque; S M Cadarette
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A large prospective European cohort study of patients treated with strontium ranelate and followed up over 3 years.

Authors:  M Audran; F J Jakob; S Palacios; M-L Brandi; H Bröll; N A T Hamdy; E V McCloskey
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Use of strontium ranelate and risk of acute coronary syndrome: cohort study.

Authors:  Henrik Svanström; Björn Pasternak; Anders Hviid
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Cardiac concerns associated with strontium ranelate.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 4.250

9.  SCOPE: a scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe.

Authors:  J A Kanis; F Borgström; J Compston; K Dreinhöfer; E Nolte; L Jonsson; W F Lems; E V McCloskey; R Rizzoli; J Stenmark
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Ischaemic cardiac events and use of strontium ranelate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a nested case-control study in the CPRD.

Authors:  C Cooper; K M Fox; J S Borer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological treatment options for low Bone Mineral Density and secondary osteoporosis in Anorexia Nervosa: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lauren Robinson; Victoria Aldridge; Emma M Clark; Madhusmita Misra; Nadia Micali
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 2.  Recent advances in the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Rebecca J Moon; Elaine M Dennison; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  Normalization of bone mineral density after five years of treatment with strontium ranelate.

Authors:  Julio Ariel Sánchez
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2015-12-29

Review 4.  The role of calcium supplementation in healthy musculoskeletal ageing : An expert consensus meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Foundation for Osteoporosis (IOF).

Authors:  N C Harvey; E Biver; J-M Kaufman; J Bauer; J Branco; M L Brandi; O Bruyère; V Coxam; A Cruz-Jentoft; E Czerwinski; H Dimai; P Fardellone; F Landi; J-Y Reginster; B Dawson-Hughes; J A Kanis; R Rizzoli; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Recent advances in the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Curtis; Rebecca J Moon; Elaine M Dennison; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.659

6.  A fatal case of DRESS induced by strontium ranelate associated with HHV-7 reactivation.

Authors:  F Drago; L Cogorno; F Broccolo; G Ciccarese; A Parodi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 7.  Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome and the Rheumatologist.

Authors:  Marwan H Adwan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.686

8.  Environmental Factors Impacting Bone-Relevant Chemokines.

Authors:  Justin T Smith; Andrew D Schneider; Karina M Katchko; Chawon Yun; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  Unmet needs and current and future approaches for osteoporotic patients at high risk of hip fracture.

Authors:  Serge Ferrari; Jean-Yves Reginster; Maria Luisa Brandi; John A Kanis; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Jean-Marc Féron; Andreas Kurth; René Rizzoli
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 10.  The Potential of microRNAs for Stem Cell-based Therapy for Degenerative Skeletal Diseases.

Authors:  Emma Budd; Shona Waddell; María C de Andrés; Richard O C Oreffo
Journal:  Curr Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2017-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.