Literature DB >> 24322475

Nationwide registry-based analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and adverse outcomes in patients treated with strontium ranelate.

B Abrahamsen1, E L Grove, P Vestergaard.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: National registers showed that a large proportion of patients treated with strontium ranelate have conditions that may now contraindicate use. The risk of death in strontium ranelate-treated patients was significantly higher than that seen in users of other osteoporosis drugs even after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factor profile.
INTRODUCTION: The European Medicines Agency (EMA) recently warned that strontium ranelate should be avoided in patients with ischaemic heart disease (IHD), peripheral vascular disease (PVD) or cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. We investigated to what extent patients beginning strontium ranelate had cardiovascular conditions and determined the rates of MI, stroke and death.
METHODS: Using the Danish National Prescription Database, we identified all 3,252 patients aged 50+ who began strontium ranelate in 2005-2007 and 35,606 users of other osteoporosis drugs as controls. Hospital contacts and causes of death were retrieved from national registers.
RESULTS: Patients starting strontium were older than patients treated with other osteoporosis drugs and more likely to suffer from IHD, PVD or CVD (combined prevalence 19.2 % in female users and 29.5 % in male users). The adjusted risk of MI was not significantly increased (women: HR 1.05 [95 % CI 0.79-1.41, p = 0.73]; men: 1.28 [0.74-2.20, p = 0.38]). For stroke, the adjusted HR was 1.23 (0.98-1.55, p = 0.07) in women and 1.64 (0.99-2.70, p = 0.05) in men. All-cause mortality was higher in strontium users (women: adjusted HR 1.20 [1.10-1.30, p < 0.001]; men: adjusted HR 1.22 [1.03-1.45, p < 0.05]).
CONCLUSION: Patients treated with strontium ranelate have an unfavourable cardiovascular risk profile compared with users of other osteoporosis drugs. However, only the risk of death differed significantly from the rates observed in users of other osteoporosis drugs adjusted for risk factor profile. A large proportion of patients currently treated with strontium ranelate have conditions that would now be considered contraindications according to EMA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24322475     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2469-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  9 in total

1.  The validity of the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in routine statistics: a comparison of mortality and hospital discharge data with the Danish MONICA registry.

Authors:  Mette Madsen; Michael Davidsen; Søren Rasmussen; Steen Z Abildstrom; Merete Osler
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Hemorheological changes with strontium ranelate treatment do not seem to be related to its claimed prothrombotic effects.

Authors:  Zekeriya Ulger; Esin Ileri Gurel; Meltem Halil; Gulsen Oozen; Isilay Kalan; Nurten Seringec; Burcu Balam Yavuz; Yusuf Yesil; Mustafa Cankurtaran; Neslihan Dikmenoglu; Servet Ariogul
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Analysis of the association between bisphosphonate treatment survival in Danish hip fracture patients-a nationwide register-based open cohort study.

Authors:  L Bondo; P Eiken; B Abrahamsen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism in users of strontium ranelate: an analysis of data from a prescription-event monitoring study in England.

Authors:  Vicki Osborne; Deborah Layton; Michael Perrio; Lynda Wilton; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Validity of stroke diagnoses in a National Register of Patients.

Authors:  Lars-Henrik Krarup; Gudrun Boysen; Huma Janjua; Eva Prescott; Thomas Truelsen
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark J Bolland; Andrew B Grey; Greg D Gamble; Ian R Reid
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Bisphosphonate use is associated with reduced risk of myocardial infarction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Frederick Wolfe; Marcy B Bolster; Christopher M O'Connor; Kaleb Michaud; Kenneth W Lyles; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Inflammatory eye reactions in patients treated with bisphosphonates and other osteoporosis medications: cohort analysis using a national prescription database.

Authors:  Michael Pazianas; Emma M Clark; Pia A Eiken; Kim Brixen; Bo Abrahamsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Treatment of osteoporosis: recognizing and managing cutaneous adverse reactions and drug-induced hypersensitivity.

Authors:  P Musette; M L Brandi; P Cacoub; J M Kaufman; R Rizzoli; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.071

  9 in total
  24 in total

Review 1.  Managing osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Shirley P Yu; David J Hunter
Journal:  Aust Prescr       Date:  2015-08-03

Review 2.  Managing Osteoporosis in Patients on Long-Term Bisphosphonate Treatment: Report of a Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Authors:  Robert A Adler; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan; Douglas C Bauer; Pauline M Camacho; Bart L Clarke; Gregory A Clines; Juliet E Compston; Matthew T Drake; Beatrice J Edwards; Murray J Favus; Susan L Greenspan; Ross McKinney; Robert J Pignolo; Deborah E Sellmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Presentation and management of osteoporosis presenting in association with pregnancy or lactation.

Authors:  C S Kovacs; S H Ralston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Treatment of osteoporosis after alendronate or risedronate.

Authors:  P Eiken; P Vestergaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  New strategies for osteoporosis patients previously managed with strontium ranelate.

Authors:  Peter Vestergaard
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.346

6.  The potential role of herbal extract Wedelolactone for treating particle-induced osteolysis: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Yung-Chang Lu; Ting-Kuo Chang; Tzu-Chiao Lin; Shu-Ting Yeh; Hsu-Wei Fang; Chun-Hsiung Huang; Chang-Hung Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.677

7.  Effects of strontium ranelate on markers of cardiovascular risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic women.

Authors:  Marco Atteritano; Antonino Catalano; Domenico Santoro; Antonino Lasco; Salvatore Benvenga
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  The position of strontium ranelate in today's management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J-Y Reginster; M-L Brandi; J Cannata-Andía; C Cooper; B Cortet; J-M Feron; H Genant; S Palacios; J D Ringe; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effect of Strontium Ranelate on Condylar Growth during Mandibular Advancement in Rats.

Authors:  Hasan Camcı; Cenk Doruk; Serpil Ünver Saraydın
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-11-27

10.  Pharmacological interventions versus placebo, no treatment or usual care for osteoporosis in people with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5D.

Authors:  Takashi Hara; Yasukazu Hijikata; Yukiko Matsubara; Norio Watanabe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.