Susan L Greenspan1, Subashan Perera2, Mary Anne Ferchak3, David A Nace3, Neil M Resnick3. 1. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania2Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania3Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Eighty-five percent of institutionalized elderly people have osteoporosis and bone fracture rates 8 to 9 times higher than rates observed among community-dwelling elderly people. Nevertheless, most of these persons are left untreated and are excluded from pivotal osteoporosis trials. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid to treat osteoporosis in frail elderly women in long-term care facilities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study from December 2007 through March 2012. Included were 181 women 65 or older with osteoporosis, including those with cognitive impairment, immobility, and multimorbidity, who were living in nursing homes and assisted-living facilities. INTERVENTIONS: One 5-mg dose of zoledronic acid or placebo intravenously and daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 and 24 months and adverse events. RESULTS: There were no baseline differences in mean (SE) age (85.4 [0.6] years), BMD, or functional or cognitive status, but the treatment group included more participants with frailty, falls history, diabetes, and anticonvulsant medication use. Values for BMD were available for 87% of participants at 12 months and 73% at 24 months. Mean (SE) BMD changes were greater in the treatment group: 3.2 (0.7) and 3.9 (0.7) percentage-point differences in the total hip at 12 and 24 months, respectively (P < .01 for both comparisons), and 1.8 (0.7) and 3.6 (0.7) percentage-point differences at the spine (P < .01); adjusted analyses were similar. The treatment and placebo groups' fracture rates were 20% and 16%, respectively (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.61-2.78); mortality rates were 16% and 13% (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.54-2.86). Groups did not differ in the proportion of single fallers (28% vs 24%; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.64-2.42; P = .52), but more participants in the treatment group had multiple falls (49% vs 35%; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.01-3.33; P = .047); however, this difference was no longer significant when adjusted for baseline frailty. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this group of frail elderly women with osteoporosis, 1 dose of zoledronic acid improved BMD over 2 years. The clinical importance of nonsignificant increases in fracture and mortality rates in the treatment group needs further study. Since it is not known whether such therapy reduces the risk of fracture in this cohort, any change in nursing home practice must await results of larger trials powered to assess fracture rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00558012.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Eighty-five percent of institutionalized elderly people have osteoporosis and bone fracture rates 8 to 9 times higher than rates observed among community-dwelling elderly people. Nevertheless, most of these persons are left untreated and are excluded from pivotal osteoporosis trials. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid to treat osteoporosis in frail elderly women in long-term care facilities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We conducted a 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study from December 2007 through March 2012. Included were 181 women 65 or older with osteoporosis, including those with cognitive impairment, immobility, and multimorbidity, who were living in nursing homes and assisted-living facilities. INTERVENTIONS: One 5-mg dose of zoledronic acid or placebo intravenously and daily calcium and vitamin D supplementation. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Hip and spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 and 24 months and adverse events. RESULTS: There were no baseline differences in mean (SE) age (85.4 [0.6] years), BMD, or functional or cognitive status, but the treatment group included more participants with frailty, falls history, diabetes, and anticonvulsant medication use. Values for BMD were available for 87% of participants at 12 months and 73% at 24 months. Mean (SE) BMD changes were greater in the treatment group: 3.2 (0.7) and 3.9 (0.7) percentage-point differences in the total hip at 12 and 24 months, respectively (P < .01 for both comparisons), and 1.8 (0.7) and 3.6 (0.7) percentage-point differences at the spine (P < .01); adjusted analyses were similar. The treatment and placebo groups' fracture rates were 20% and 16%, respectively (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.61-2.78); mortality rates were 16% and 13% (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.54-2.86). Groups did not differ in the proportion of single fallers (28% vs 24%; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.64-2.42; P = .52), but more participants in the treatment group had multiple falls (49% vs 35%; OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.01-3.33; P = .047); however, this difference was no longer significant when adjusted for baseline frailty. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this group of frail elderly women with osteoporosis, 1 dose of zoledronic acid improved BMD over 2 years. The clinical importance of nonsignificant increases in fracture and mortality rates in the treatment group needs further study. Since it is not known whether such therapy reduces the risk of fracture in this cohort, any change in nursing home practice must await results of larger trials powered to assess fracture rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00558012.
Authors: Sarah Sullivan; Julie Wagner; Neil M Resnick; Joel Nelson; Subashan K Perera; Susan L Greenspan Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Stephanie Studenski; Subashan Perera; Kushang Patel; Caterina Rosano; Kimberly Faulkner; Marco Inzitari; Jennifer Brach; Julie Chandler; Peggy Cawthon; Elizabeth Barrett Connor; Michael Nevitt; Marjolein Visser; Stephen Kritchevsky; Stefania Badinelli; Tamara Harris; Anne B Newman; Jane Cauley; Luigi Ferrucci; Jack Guralnik Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Steven Boonen; Fernando Marin; Dan Mellstrom; Li Xie; Durisala Desaiah; John H Krege; Clifford J Rosen Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Gabor Abellan van Kan; Yves Rolland; Mathieu Houles; Sophie Gillette-Guyonnet; Maria Soto; Bruno Vellas Journal: Clin Geriatr Med Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 3.076
Authors: Andrew Grey; Mark J Bolland; Diana Wattie; Anne Horne; Greg Gamble; Ian R Reid Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2008-12-02 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Mark J Bolland; Andrew B Grey; Anne M Horne; Simon E Briggs; Mark G Thomas; Rod B Ellis-Pegler; Karen E Callon; Greg D Gamble; Ian R Reid Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Mark D Neuman; Jeffrey H Silber; Jay S Magaziner; Molly A Passarella; Samir Mehta; Rachel M Werner Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Steven Boonen; Dennis M Black; Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Richard Eastell; Jay S Magaziner; Erik Fink Eriksen; Peter Mesenbrink; Patrick Haentjens; Kenneth W Lyles Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrew R Zullo; Tingting Zhang; Yoojin Lee; Kevin W McConeghy; Lori A Daiello; Douglas P Kiel; Vincent Mor; Sarah D Berry Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sarah D Berry; Andrew R Zullo; Yoojin Lee; Vincent Mor; Kevin W McConeghy; Geetanjoli Banerjee; Ralph B D'Agostino; Lori Daiello; David Dosa; Douglas P Kiel Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Jennifer G Naples; Mary P Kotlarczyk; Subashan Perera; Susan L Greenspan; Joseph T Hanlon Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Mary P Kotlarczyk; Subashan Perera; Neil M Resnick; David A Nace; Susan L Greenspan Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Gustavo Duque; Stephen R Lord; Jenson Mak; Kirtan Ganda; Jacqueline J T Close; Peter Ebeling; Alexandra Papaioannou; Charles A Inderjeeth Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 4.669