| Literature DB >> 25866824 |
Giuseppe Spaziano1, Livio Luongo1, Francesca Guida1, Stefania Petrosino2, Maria Matteis1, Enza Palazzo3, Nikol Sullo1, Vito de Novellis1, Vincenzo Di Marzo2, Francesco Rossi1, Sabatino Maione4, Bruno D'Agostino1.
Abstract
Allergen exposure may induce changes in the brainstem secondary neurons, with neural sensitization of the nucleus solitary tract (NTS), which in turn can be considered one of the causes of the airway hyperresponsiveness, a characteristic feature of asthma. We evaluated neurofunctional, morphological, and biochemical changes in the NTS of naive or sensitized rats. To evaluate the cell firing activity of NTS, in vivo electrophysiological experiments were performed before and after capsaicin challenge in sensitized or naive rats. Immunohistochemical studies, endocannabinoid, and palmitoylethanolamide quantification in the NTS were also performed. This study provides evidence that allergen sensitization in the NTS induced: (1) increase in the neural firing response to intratracheal capsaicin application, (2) increase of endocannabinoid anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide, a reduction of 2-arachidonoylglycerol levels in the NTS, (3) glial cell activation, and (4) prevention by a Group III metabotropic glutamate receptor activation of neural firing response to intratracheal application of capsaicin in both naïve and sensitized rats. Therefore, normalization of ovalbumin-induced NTS neural sensitization could open up the prospect of new treatments based on the recovery of specific brain nuclei function and for extensive studies on acute or long-term efficacy of selective mGlu ligand, in models of bronchial hyperreactivity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25866824 PMCID: PMC4383154 DOI: 10.1155/2015/980983
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Airway responsiveness to methacholine in ovalbumin (sensitized) or saline treated rats (control) (n = 5). ** P < 0.01 compared with control group. Circles represent single values and squares represent mean values.
Endocannabinoid levels in the NTS area.
| NTS | ||
|---|---|---|
| Control | Sensitized | |
| Anandamide (pmol/g) | 32.0 ± 3.0 | 49.9 ± 3.1* |
| 2-AG (nmol/g) | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.1* |
| Palmitoylethanolamide (pmol/g) | 961.4 ± 16.4 | 1187.8 ± 43.4* |
Data are means ± SEM of n = 4 separate experiments. * P < 0.05 as assessed by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's test.
Figure 2Example of ratemeter records which illustrate the spontaneous activity of NTS neurons before and after capsaicin administration (hollow arrow). (a) control rat, (b) ovalbumin-sensitized rat. A single oscilloscope trace (2 min recording) shows spontaneous activity of a single unit (long black arrow) immediately before and after intratracheal capsaicin application. Small black arrowheads indicate single vagal stimulations. Scale bar = 1 min.
Figure 3Effect of vehicle (20% DMSO in ACSF) or capsaicin (300 pg in 20 μL) in naïve (a) and sensitized (b) rats. L-AP4 (4 nmol/rat) (hollow arrow) prevented the capsaicin (full arrow) induced increase in the airway-related NTS neuron ongoing activities. This effect of L-AP4 (4 nmol/rat) was prevented by pretreatment with MSOP (100 nmol/rat) (arrow with lines). Each point represents the mean ± SEM of five rats per group. Values statistically (P value < 0.05) significant versus the respective control were indicated as open symbols.
Figure 4(a) Low magnification of NTS brain area and schematic representation (see Paxinos and Watson, 1986 [26]) of the area beside. (b, f, l) Iba-1 IR in NTS of a naive rat. (c, g, m) Iba-1 IR in NTS of sensitized rat to ovalbumin. (d, h, n) GFAP IR in NTS of a naive rat. (e, i, o) GFAP IR in NTS of sensitized rat. High magnification of Iba-1 + profiles (l, m) and GFAP + profiles (n, o) arrows. Scale bars = 100 μm. (A, B) Quantitative analysis of Iba1 and GFAP staining in NTS reveals significantly increased numbers of Iba-1 and GFAP-positive cells in the NTS after ovalbumin sensitization. Data represented as mean ± SEM, n = 3 rats per group. ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 compared to control group, one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey.