| Literature DB >> 31611790 |
Renata Esposito1, Giuseppe Spaziano1, Domenico Giannattasio2, Francesco Ferrigno2, Angela Liparulo1, Antonietta Rossi3, Fiorentina Roviezzo3, Maurizio Sessa1,4, Maddalena Falciani2, Liberato Berrino1, Mario Polverino2, Francesca Polverino5, Bruno D'Agostino1.
Abstract
Purpose: Gender differences exist in the prevalence of asthma and allergic diseases, partially due to the effects of sex hormones on the development of allergic manifestations. Women, compared with men, are more prone to suffer allergic asthma, experience difficulties in controlling asthma symptoms, and show adverse responses to drugs. However, there are knowledge gaps on the effectiveness of anti-leukotrienes drugs on lung function, symptoms, and pulmonary and systemic inflammation in adult asthmatic women compared with men. We conducted a prospective cohort study to characterize the effectiveness of an anti-leukotrienes drug, montelukast (MS), in asthmatic adult women and men.Entities:
Keywords: asthma; eosinophils; gender differences; leukotrienes; montelukast; nitric oxide
Year: 2019 PMID: 31611790 PMCID: PMC6769077 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
Demographic characteristics of study participants.
| Participant demographics | |
|---|---|
| Total participants (n) | 21 |
| Gender: Female (n) | 11 |
| Gender: Male(n) | 10 |
| Mean Age (years) | 33 ± 10 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | M: 25.8 ± 2.8 |
| Current Smokers (n) (8.2 ± 2.9 pack/years) | 1 man, 1 woman |
| Age at asthma onset (years), mean ± SD | 45 ± 5 |
| Exacerbations n/years | 3 |
Figure 1ACT evaluation. ACT evaluations in montelukast treated group in women (A) and in men (B) at the enrollment visit (EV) and at the end of study (ES). (C) Δ ACT (%) in treated women and in men. Results were shown as means ± SEM. The statistical tests used in these analyses were two-way analysis of variance followed by Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
Data results of FEV1.0, FVC, FeNO, ACT, EOS, and Δ% indicated as mean ± SEM.
| Stage | Treated | Treated | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Treatment | Post-Treatment | Delta % | Pre-Treatment | Post-Treatment | Delta % | |||||
| BV (mean ± SEM) | ES (mean ± SEM) | P value | (mean ± SEM) | P value | BV (mean ± SEM) | ES (mean ± SEM) | P value | (mean ± SEM) | P value | |
| FEV1.0 % | 77.25 ± 6.79 | 103.88 ± 6.24 | 0.008 | 22.84 ± 6.00 | <0.001 | 78.88 ± 6.15 | 85.88 ± 6.14 | NS | 8.97 ± 6.00 | <0.001 |
| FVC % | 91.95 ± 6.81 | 113.17 ± 4.79 | 0.018 | 22.80 ± 6.00 | <0.001 | 81.11 ± 6.98 | 91.52 ± 6.53 | NS | 13.00 ± 4.00 | <0.001 |
| FeNO ppb | 41.72 ± 4.26 | 18.18 ± 1.92 | <0.001 | –56.42 ± 5.00 | <0.001 | 44.70 ± 7.30 | 25.20 ± 3.90 | 0.029 | –43.60 ± 6.00 | <0.001 |
| ACT | 17.00 ± 1.07 | 23.36 ± 0.45 | 0.001 | 37.41 ± 1.00 | <0.001 | 17.50 ± 1.44 | 22.10 ± 0.79 | 0.038 | 30.00 ± 1.50 | <0.001 |
| Blood EOS % | 5.27 ± 0.30 | 3.30 ± 0.31 | 0.045 | –37.38 ± 0.30 | <0.001 | 3.61 ± 0.70 | 3.19 ± 0.66 | NS | –11.63 ± 0.60 | <0.001 |
BV, baseline visit; ES, end of study visit; ppb; part per billion; EOS: eosinophils.
Figure 2Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1.0) and forced vital capacity (FVC) evaluation. FEV1.0 (%) in montelukast treated in women (A) and in men (B) at the enrollment visit (EV) and at the end of study (ES). (C) Δ FEV1.0 (%) in treated women and in men. FVC (%) in montelukast treated group in women (D) and in men (E) at EV and at ES. (F) Δ FVC (%) in treated women and in men. Results were shown as means ± SEM. The statistical tests used in these analyses were two-way analysis of variance followed by Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Eosinophils (EOS) levels. EOS (%) in montelukast treated group in women (A) and in men (B) at the enrollment visit (EV) and at the end of study (ES). (C) Δ EOS (%) in treated women and in men. Results were shown as means ± SEM. The statistical tests used in these analyses were two-way analysis of variance followed by Student’s t-test. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4FeNO levels. FeNO level in montelukast treated group in women (A) and in men (B) at the enrollment visit (EV) and at the end of study (ES). (C) Δ FeNO (%) in treated women and in men. Results were shown as means ± SEM. The statistical tests used in these analyses were two-way analysis of variance followed by Student’s t-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.