Literature DB >> 25865546

Modeling of muscle forces in humans with and without temporomandibular joint disorders.

L R Iwasaki1, H Liu, Y M Gonzalez, D B Marx, J C Nickel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Subjects with/without temporomandibular joint disorders (TMJD) were tested for differences in muscle forces. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: School of Dental Medicine, University at Buffalo. Ninety-one subjects were classified in four groups based on the presence/absence (±) of chronic myofascial and/or TMJ pain (P) and bilateral disc displacement (DD).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Validated numerical models employed an organizational objective and subjects' anatomy to calculate masticatory muscle forces during static biting. anova and Holm's step-down procedure post hoc tests assessed group differences. Theoretical geometries, representing the range of subjects' muscle orientations, were surveyed via numerical models to identify key combinations resulting in high muscle forces. Effect size (Cohen's d) and anova/post hoc tests assessed group differences in key muscle orientations.
RESULTS: +P-DD subjects had significantly higher muscle forces, especially for lateral pterygoid muscles, compared to the other groups (p<0.01) for bite forces that were directed posteromedially or posterolaterally on mandibular molars and posteriorly and slightly medially on mandibular incisors. Key muscle orientations for peak lateral pterygoid muscle forces were identified, and group comparisons showed mean orientation in +P-DD compared to other diagnostic groups was ≥5° more upright for masseter and ≥3° more posteriorly directed for temporalis muscles (all Cohen's d≥0.8).
CONCLUSION: Predicted lateral pterygoid muscle forces were significantly higher in +P-DD compared to other groups for specific biting conditions and were attributable, in part, to differences in masseter and temporalis muscle orientations.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; computer models; human; masticatory muscles; temporomandibular joint

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25865546      PMCID: PMC4396659          DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  30 in total

1.  Neuromuscular objectives of the human masticatory apparatus during static biting.

Authors:  L R Iwasaki; P E Petsche; W D McCall; D Marx; J C Nickel
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.633

2.  Prediction of the articular eminence shape in a patient with unilateral hypoplasia of the right mandibular ramus before and after distraction osteogenesis-A simulation study.

Authors:  Mark de Zee; Paolo M Cattaneo; Peter Svensson; Thomas K Pedersen; Birte Melsen; John Rasmussen; Michel Dalstra
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique.

Authors:  S F Dworkin; L LeResche
Journal:  J Craniomandib Disord       Date:  1992

4.  Waking-state oral parafunctional behaviors: specificity and validity as assessed by electromyography.

Authors:  Richard Ohrbach; Michael R Markiewicz; Willard D McCall
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.612

5.  Eminence development of the postnatal human temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  J C Nickel; K R McLachlan; D M Smith
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Electromyographic heterogeneity in the human temporalis and masseter muscles during static biting, open/close excursions, and chewing.

Authors:  N G Blanksma; T M van Eijden
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Temporomandibular joint loads in subjects with and without disc displacement.

Authors:  Laura R Iwasaki; Michael J Crosby; Yoly Gonzalez; Willard D McCall; David B Marx; Richard Ohrbach; Jeffrey C Nickel
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2009

8.  Masticatory muscle sleep background electromyographic activity is elevated in myofascial temporomandibular disorder patients.

Authors:  K G Raphael; M N Janal; D A Sirois; B Dubrovsky; P E Wigren; J J Klausner; A C Krieger; G J Lavigne
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.837

9.  Magnified visual feedback exacerbates positional variability in older adults due to altered modulation of the primary agonist muscle.

Authors:  Harsimran S Baweja; Minhyuk Kwon; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Contribution of vision to postural behaviors during continuous support-surface translations.

Authors:  D Joseph Jilk; Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  4 in total

1.  Association between waking-state oral parafunctional behaviours and bio-psychosocial characteristics.

Authors:  S N Khawaja; J C Nickel; L R Iwasaki; H C Crow; Y Gonzalez
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.837

2.  Jaw closing movement and sex differences in temporomandibular joint energy densities.

Authors:  L M Gallo; N Fankhauser; Y M Gonzalez; H Liu; Y Liu; J C Nickel; L R Iwasaki
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Mechanobehavioral Scores in Women with and without TMJ Disc Displacement.

Authors:  L R Iwasaki; Y M Gonzalez; Y Liu; H Liu; M Markova; L M Gallo; J C Nickel
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 6.116

4.  Is There an Association Between Temporomandibular Joint Effusion and Arthralgia?

Authors:  Shehryar N Khawaja; Heidi Crow; Ruba F G Mahmoud; Krishnan Kartha; Yoly Gonzalez
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.895

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.