Literature DB >> 22948735

Magnified visual feedback exacerbates positional variability in older adults due to altered modulation of the primary agonist muscle.

Harsimran S Baweja1, Minhyuk Kwon, Evangelos A Christou.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether magnified visual feedback during position-holding contractions exacerbates the age-associated differences in motor output variability due to changes in the neural activation of the agonist muscle in the upper and lower limb. Twelve young (18-35 years) and ten older adults (65-85 years) were instructed to accurately match a target position at 5° of index finger abduction and ankle dorsiflexion while lifting 10 % of their 1 repetition maximum (1RM) load. Position was maintained at three different visual angles (0.1°, 1°, and 4°) that varied across trials. Each trial lasted 25 s and visual feedback of position was removed from 15 to 25 s. Positional error was quantified as the root mean square error (RMSE) of the subject's performance from the target. Positional variability was quantified as the standard deviation of the position data. The neural activation of the first dorsal interosseus and tibialis anterior was measured with surface electromyography (EMG). Older adults were less accurate compared with young adults and the RMSE decreased significantly with an increase in visual gain. As expected, and independent of limb, older adults exhibited significantly greater positional variability compared with young adults that was exacerbated with magnification of visual feedback (1° and 4°). This increase in variability at the highest magnification of visual feedback was predicted by a decrease in power from 12 to 30 Hz of the agonist EMG signal. These findings demonstrate that motor control in older adults is impaired by magnified visual feedback during positional tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22948735      PMCID: PMC3631577          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3219-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Task differences with the same load torque alter the endurance time of submaximal fatiguing contractions in humans.

Authors:  Sandra K Hunter; Daphne L Ryan; Justus D Ortega; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Intermittency in the control of continuous force production.

Authors:  A B Slifkin; D E Vaillancourt; K M Newell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effects of aging on force variability, single motor unit discharge patterns, and the structure of 10, 20, and 40 Hz EMG activity.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Lars Larsson; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Ramification pattern of intermetacarpal branches of the deep branch (ramus profundus) of the ulnar nerve in the human hand.

Authors:  T Homma; T Sakai
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1991

5.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: differential vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter.

Authors:  N Raz; F M Gunning; D Head; J H Dupuis; J McQuain; S D Briggs; W J Loken; A E Thornton; J D Acker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Aging and the Simon task.

Authors:  Rob H J van der Lubbe; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Aging and rhythmical force output: loss of adaptive control of multiple neural oscillators.

Authors:  Jacob J Sosnoff; David E Vaillancourt; Karl M Newell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Age and contraction type influence motor output variability in rapid discrete tasks.

Authors:  Evangelos A Christou; Les G Carlton
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-08

10.  The 1- to 2-Hz oscillations in muscle force are exacerbated by stress, especially in older adults.

Authors:  Evangelos A Christou; Jennifer M Jakobi; Ashley Critchlow; Monika Fleshner; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Visual information processing in older adults: reaction time and motor unit pool modulation.

Authors:  MinHyuk Kwon; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Motor control differs for increasing and releasing force.

Authors:  Seoung Hoon Park; MinHyuk Kwon; Danielle Solis; Neha Lodha; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Modeling of muscle forces in humans with and without temporomandibular joint disorders.

Authors:  L R Iwasaki; H Liu; Y M Gonzalez; D B Marx; J C Nickel
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Voluntary reduction of force variability via modulation of low-frequency oscillations.

Authors:  Seoung Hoon Park; Agostina Casamento-Moran; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Speed but not amplitude of visual feedback exacerbates force variability in older adults.

Authors:  Changki Kim; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The Effect of Antagonist Muscle Sensory Input on Force Regulation.

Authors:  Tanya Onushko; Brian D Schmit; Allison Hyngstrom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Force control is related to low-frequency oscillations in force and surface EMG.

Authors:  Hwasil Moon; Changki Kim; Minhyuk Kwon; Yen Ting Chen; Tanya Onushko; Neha Lodha; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.