Literature DB >> 25864048

Analyzing the heterogeneity of farmers' preferences for improvements in dairy cow traits using farmer typologies.

D Martin-Collado1, T J Byrne2, P R Amer2, B F S Santos2, M Axford3, J E Pryce4.   

Abstract

Giving consideration to farmers' preferences for improvements in animal traits when designing genetic selection tools such as selection indexes might increase the uptake of these tools. The increase in use of genetic selection tools will, in turn, assist in the realization of genetic gain in breeding programs. However, the determination of farmers' preferences is not trivial because of its large heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to quantify Australian dairy farmers' preferences for cow trait improvements to inform and ultimately direct the choice of traits and selection indexes in the 2014 review of the National Breeding Objective. A specific aim was to analyze the heterogeneity of preferences for cow trait improvements by determining whether there are farmer types that can be identified with specific patterns of preferences. We analyzed whether farmer types differed in farming system, socioeconomic profile, and attitudes toward breeding and genetic evaluation tools. An online survey was developed to explore farmers' preferences for improvement in 13 cow traits. The pairwise comparisons method was used to derive a ranking of the traits for each respondent. A total of 551 farmers fully completed the survey. A principal component analysis followed by a Ward hierarchical cluster analysis was used to group farmers according to their preferences. Three types of farmers were determined: (1) production-focused farmers, who gave the highest preference of all for improvements in protein yield, lactation persistency, feed efficiency, cow live weight, and milking speed; (2) functionality-focused farmers with the highest preferences of all for improvements in mastitis, lameness, and calving difficulty; and (3) type-focused farmers with the highest preferences of all for mammary system and type. Farmer types differed in their age, their attitudes toward genetic selection, and in the selection criteria they use. Surprisingly, farmer types did not differ for herd size, calving, feeding system, or breed. These results support the idea that preferences for cow trait improvements are intrinsic to farmers and not to production systems or breeds. As a result of this study, and some bioeconomic modeling (not included in this study), the Australian dairy industry has implemented a main index and 2 alternative indexes targeting the different farmer types described here.
Copyright © 2015 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breeding objective; dairy selection index; farmer type; trait preference

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25864048     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-9194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  9 in total

1.  Defining Household Typologies Based on Cropland Use Behaviors for Rural Human-Environment Systems Simulation Research: A Case Study in Southwest China.

Authors:  Ming Li; Yukuan Wang; Congshan Tian; Liang Emlyn Yang; Md Sarwar Hossain
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-22       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Current situations of animal data recording, dairy improvement infrastructure, human capacity and strategic issues affecting dairy production in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  O Opoola; R Mrode; G Banos; J Ojango; C Banga; G Simm; M G G Chagunda
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Characterization of dairy innovations in selected milksheds in Kenya using a categorical principal component analysis.

Authors:  Edith Wairimu; John Mburu; Charles K Gachuiri; Asaah Ndambi
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 4.  Developing 'Smart' Dairy Farming Responsive to Farmers and Consumer-Citizens: A Review.

Authors:  Maeve Mary Henchion; Áine Regan; Marion Beecher; Áine MackenWalsh
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Market Intelligence and Incentive-Based Trait Ranking for Plant Breeding: A Sweetpotato Pilot in Uganda.

Authors:  Julius J Okello; Jolien Swanckaert; Daniel Martin-Collado; Bruno Santos; Benard Yada; Robert O M Mwanga; Anouk Schurink; Michael Quinn; Graham Thiele; Simon Heck; Timothy J Byrne; Guy G Hareau; Hugo Campos
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Preventive Hoof Trimming and Animal-Based Welfare Measures Influence the Time to First Lameness Event and Hoof Lesion Prevalence in Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Mohammed B Sadiq; Siti Z Ramanoon; Wan Mastura M Shaik Mossadeq; Rozaihan Mansor; Sharifah S Syed-Hussain
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-11

7.  Breeding practices and trait preferences of smallholder farmers for indigenous sheep in the northwest highlands of Ethiopia: Inputs to design a breeding program.

Authors:  Abiye Shenkut Abebe; Kefyalew Alemayehu; Anna Maria Johansson; Solomon Gizaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Meeting Breeding Potential in Organic and Low-Input Dairy Farming.

Authors:  Hannah Davis; Sokratis Stergiadis; Eleni Chatzidimitriou; Roy Sanderson; Carlo Leifert; Gillian Butler
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-28

9.  Gender inclusivity through maize breeding in Africa: A review of the issues and options for future engagement.

Authors:  Rachel C Voss; Jason Donovan; Pieter Rutsaert; Jill E Cairns
Journal:  Outlook Agric       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 1.877

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.