Literature DB >> 25863687

Computed tomography for non-traumatic headache in the emergency department and the impact of follow-up testing on altering the initial diagnosis.

Jeffrey S Quon1, Rafael Glikstein2, Christopher S Lim3, Betty Anne Schwarz4.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to determine the incidence of positive computed tomography (CT) findings in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with non-traumatic headache at our institution and (2) to examine follow-up exams, including lumbar puncture, non-enhanced CT, CT angiogram, CT venogram, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to see how often the use of further testing changes the diagnosis. With IRB approval, 865 patients were identified through ED requisitions for CT head with the indication of headache during the calendar year 2011. Exclusion criteria included head trauma, prior intracranial surgery, focal neurologic symptoms, and known intracranial mass. CT results were divided into three categories: P0, P1, and P2. Negative studies were graded as P0. Positive studies were subdivided into clinically insignificant or P1 and clinically significant or P2. Clinically significant was defined as requiring medical treatment. Subsequently, the electronic medical records and picture archiving and communication system (PACS) were reviewed to determine the incidence of follow-up exams, including lumbar puncture or imaging. The secondary tests were divided into the same P0, P1, and P2 categories. There were 254 positive studies: P1 clinically insignificant (27.1 %, 235/865) and P2 clinically significant (2.2 %, 19/865). Of 257 follow-up exams performed, the majority were lumbar punctures (36.0 %) or CT angiograms (29.5 %). In 19/257 exams or 7.4 %, the additional testing changed the clinically insignificant (P0/P1) diagnosis to a significant (P2) result. At our institution, there was a 2.2 % incidence of significant positive CT findings in patients presenting to the ED with non-traumatic headache. Follow-up testing was variable and resulted in a 7.4 % increase in the severity of diagnosis compared to the initial negative CT scan.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT head; Emergency department; Headache screening; Non-traumatic headache

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25863687     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-015-1314-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  15 in total

1.  Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Anurag Gupta; Ivan K Ip; Ali S Raja; James E Andruchow; Aaron Sodickson; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Economic and outcomes assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of headache.

Authors:  J E Jordan; G F Ramirez; W G Bradley; D Y Chen; J B Lightfoote; A Song
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Atraumatic headache in US emergency departments: recent trends in CT/MRI utilisation and factors associated with severe intracranial pathology.

Authors:  John W Gilbert; Kevin M Johnson; Gregory L Larkin; Christopher L Moore
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide.

Authors:  Lj Stovner; K Hagen; R Jensen; Z Katsarava; Rb Lipton; Ai Scher; Tj Steiner; J-A Zwart
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.292

5.  Utilization and cost-effectiveness of cranial computed tomography at a university hospital.

Authors:  W A Knaus; D O Davis
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Neuroimaging in the evaluation of patients with non-acute headache.

Authors:  A P Sempere; J Porta-Etessam; V Medrano; I Garcia-Morales; L Concepción; A Ramos; I Florencio; F Bermejo; C Botella
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.292

7.  Clinical scoring system may improve yield of head CT of non-trauma emergency department patients.

Authors:  Christopher Bent; Paul S Lee; Peter Y Shen; Heejung Bang; Mathew Bobinski
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-03-13

8.  ACR Appropriateness Criteria Headache.

Authors:  Annette C Douglas; Franz J Wippold; Daniel F Broderick; Ashley H Aiken; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Douglas C Brown; Amanda S Corey; Isabelle M Germano; James A Hadley; Bharathi D Jagadeesan; Jennifer S Jurgens; Tabassum A Kennedy; Laszlo L Mechtler; Nandini D Patel; Gregory J Zipfel
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Computed tomography imaging in the management of headache in the emergency department: cost efficacy and policy implications.

Authors:  Yusef J Jordan; Johnson B Lightfoote; John E Jordan
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Cost-effectiveness of computed tomography in the evaluation of patients with headache.

Authors:  S Akpek; M Arac; S Atilla; B Onal; C Yücel; S Isik
Journal:  Headache       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.887

View more
  2 in total

1.  The degree and appropriateness of computed tomography utilization for diagnosis of headaches in Ghana.

Authors:  Philip Narteh Gorleku; Klenam Dzefi-Tettey; Emmanuel Kobina Mesi Edzie; Jacob Setorglo; Albert Dayor Piersson; Ishmael Nii Ofori; Isaac Frimpong Brobbey; Emmanuel Worlali Fiagbedzi; Edmund Kwadwo Kwakye Brakohiapa
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-04-07

2.  Clinical predictors of significant intracranial computed tomography scan findings in adults experiencing headache disorder.

Authors:  Ulrich Igor Mbessoh Kengne; Callixte Kuate Tegueu; Dorothée Soh Mankong; Maggy Mbede; Ulrich Gael Tene; Boniface Moifo
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-03-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.