Literature DB >> 25763568

Clinical scoring system may improve yield of head CT of non-trauma emergency department patients.

Christopher Bent1, Paul S Lee2, Peter Y Shen1, Heejung Bang3, Mathew Bobinski1.   

Abstract

The positive rate of head CT in non-trauma patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) is low. Currently, indications for imaging are based on the individual experience of the treating physician, which contributes to overutilization and variability in imaging utilization. The goals of this study are to ascertain the predictors of positive head CT in non-trauma patients and demonstrate feasibility of a clinical scoring algorithm to improve yield. We retrospectively reviewed 500 consecutive ED non-trauma patients evaluated with non-contrast head CT after presenting with headache, altered mentation, syncope, dizziness, or focal neurologic deficit. Medical records were assessed for clinical risk factors: focal neurologic deficit, altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, known malignancy, coagulopathy, and age. Data was analyzed using logistic regression and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and three derived algorithms. Positive CTs were found in 51 of 500 patients (10.2 %). Only two clinical factors were significant: focal neurologic deficit (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 20.7; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 9.4-45.7) and age >55 (adjusted OR 3.08; CI 1.44-6.56). Area under the ROC curve for all three algorithms was 0.73-0.83. In proposed algorithm C, only patients with focal neurologic deficit (major risk factor) or ≥2 of the five minor risk factors (altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, known malignancy, coagulopathy, and age) would undergo CT imaging. This may reduce utilization by 34 % with only a small decrease in sensitivity (98 %). Our simple scoring algorithm utilizing multiple clinical risk factors could help to predict the non-trauma patients who will benefit from CT imaging, resulting in reduced radiation exposure without sacrificing sensitivity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actionable results; Clinical risk factors; Computed tomography (CT); Emergency department (ED); Utilization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25763568      PMCID: PMC4990071          DOI: 10.1007/s10140-015-1305-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  9 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A "Top Five" list for emergency medicine: a policy and research agenda for stewardship to improve the value of emergency care.

Authors:  Arjun K Venkatesh; Jeremiah D Schuur
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  Syncope and head CT scans in the emergency department.

Authors:  Pierre Giglio; Edward M Bednarczyk; Karen Weiss; Rohit Bakshi
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-11-16

Review 4.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Authors:  A Laupacis; N Sekar; I G Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Head CT for nontrauma patients in the emergency department: clinical predictors of abnormal findings.

Authors:  Xi Wang; John J You
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007.

Authors:  David B Larson; Lara W Johnson; Beverly M Schnell; Shelia R Salisbury; Howard P Forman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Intracranial cause of delirium: computed tomography yield and predictive factors.

Authors:  M M Y Lai; D M Wong Tin Niam
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.048

8.  Rising annual costs of dizziness presentations to U.S. emergency departments.

Authors:  Ali S Saber Tehrani; Diarmuid Coughlan; Yu Hsiang Hsieh; Georgios Mantokoudis; Fredrick K Korley; Kevin A Kerber; Kevin D Frick; David E Newman-Toker
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Computed tomography scanning and delirium in elder patients.

Authors:  B J Naughton; M Moran; Y Ghaly; C Michalakes
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.451

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Privately insured medical patients are more likely to have a head CT.

Authors:  Emily M Fortin; Jerry Fisher; Sheng Qiu; Charlene Irvin Babcock
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-07-20

2.  Validation of clinical criteria for referral to head imaging in the neurologic emergency setting.

Authors:  Primož Žužek; Igor Rigler; Simon Podnar
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Computed tomography for non-traumatic headache in the emergency department and the impact of follow-up testing on altering the initial diagnosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Quon; Rafael Glikstein; Christopher S Lim; Betty Anne Schwarz
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-04-12

4.  Predictor variables of abnormal imaging findings of syncope in the emergency department.

Authors:  Kerem Ozturk; Esra Soylu; Cem Bilgin; Bahattin Hakyemez; Mufit Parlak
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-03-12

5.  The Value of Cranial CT Imaging in Patients With Headache at the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Cynthia M C Lemmens; M Christien van der Linden; Korné Jellema
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Keep it simple: vascular risk factors and focal exam findings correctly identify posterior circulation ischemia in "dizzy" patients.

Authors:  Karen Chen; Andrea L C Schneider; Rafael H Llinas; Elisabeth B Marsh
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2016-09-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.