Literature DB >> 27660572

Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Novel Approach in the Management of Patients With Acute Cardiogenic Shock.

Kevin Ergle1, Parham Parto1, Selim R Krim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in the management of heart failure, cardiogenic shock remains a challenging and devastating condition with significant morbidity and mortality.
METHODS: We review currently available percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices and address each device's characteristics, mechanism of action, specific clinical indications, and contraindications.
RESULTS: Four types of percutaneous MCS devices are currently available: the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella devices, the TandemHeart, and extracorporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). IABPs provide less hemodynamic support compared to the Impella, TandemHeart, and ECMO devices. However, because of its ease of placement and relatively small access catheter size, the IABP remains the most commonly used MCS device for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. When full cardiopulmonary support is needed, ECMO is the best option.
CONCLUSION: Temporary MCS has emerged as a therapeutic option in the management of patients with acute cardiogenic shock. However, clinician familiarity with the indications, limitations, and benefits of individual MCS devices and enhanced patient comfort with the placement are paramount to improve patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart-assist devices; intra-aortic balloon pumping; shock–cardiogenic

Year:  2016        PMID: 27660572      PMCID: PMC5024805     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ochsner J        ISSN: 1524-5012


  21 in total

1.  2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention.

Authors:  Charanjit S Rihal; Srihari S Naidu; Michael M Givertz; Wilson Y Szeto; James A Burke; Navin K Kapur; Morton Kern; Kirk N Garratt; James A Goldstein; Vivian Dimas; Thomas Tu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.

Authors:  Ph Gabriel Steg; Stefan K James; Dan Atar; Luigi P Badano; Carina Blömstrom-Lundqvist; Michael A Borger; Carlo Di Mario; Kenneth Dickstein; Gregory Ducrocq; Francisco Fernandez-Aviles; Anthony H Gershlick; Pantaleo Giannuzzi; Sigrun Halvorsen; Kurt Huber; Peter Juni; Adnan Kastrati; Juhani Knuuti; Mattie J Lenzen; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Marco Valgimigli; Arnoud van 't Hof; Petr Widimsky; Doron Zahger
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  S M Hollenberg; C J Kavinsky; J E Parrillo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1999-07-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Jörg Fuhrmann; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Gerhard Schuler; Karl Werdan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Percutaneous placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump in the left axillary/subclavian position provides safe, ambulatory long-term support as bridge to heart transplantation.

Authors:  Jerry D Estep; Andrea M Cordero-Reyes; Arvind Bhimaraj; Barry Trachtenberg; Nashwa Khalil; Matthias Loebe; Brian Bruckner; Carlos M Orrego; Jean Bismuth; Neal S Kleiman; Guillermo Torre-Amione
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 12.035

8.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes.

Authors:  Nisha A Gilotra; Gerin R Stevens
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 10.  Mechanical circulatory support in acute cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Mubashar H Khan; Brian J Corbett; Steven M Hollenberg
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-10-01
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Jean Touchan; Maya Guglin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 2.  How New Support Devices Change Critical Care Delivery.

Authors:  Asma Zainab; Divina Tuazon; Faisal Uddin; Iqbal Ratnani
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 3.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Acute Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Min Suk Choi; Hunbo Shim; Yang Hyun Cho
Journal:  Int J Heart Fail       Date:  2020-01-22

4.  Left ventricle unloading strategies in ECMO: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Laura M Piechura; Antonio Coppolino; Gita N Mody; Daniel E Rinewalt; Mohammed Keshk; Mitsugu Ogawa; Raghu Seethala; Erin A Bohula; David A Morrow; Steve K Singh; Hari R Mallidi; Steven P Keller
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 1.620

5.  Predictors of Hemodynamic Improvement and Stabilization Following Intraaortic Balloon Pump Implantation in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Colleen Juricek; Ann Nguyen; Ben Chung; Daniel Rodgers; Gabriel Sayer; Nitasha Sarswat; Gene Kim; Jayant Raikhelkar; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; David Onsanger; Daniel Burkhoff; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Nir Uriel
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.022

Review 6.  Mechanical Circulatory Support for Decompensated Heart Failure.

Authors:  Tarique Al Musa; Colin Dominic Chue; Hoong Sern Lim
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

7.  Adult cardiac veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECMO): prevention and management of acute complications.

Authors:  Michael M Koerner; Michael D Harper; Christopher K Gordon; Douglas Horstmanshof; James W Long; Michael J Sasevich; James D Neel; Aly El Banayosy
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

8.  First successful prevention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention by use of a pulsatile left ventricular assist device: baptism of fire of the iVAC2L device: a case report.

Authors:  Alexander Samol; Stefanie Schmidt; Melanie Zeyse; Marcus Wiemer
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2018-01-24

Review 9.  Mechanical Circulatory Support in Delayed Surgery of Post-Infarction Ventricular Septal Rupture in Patients in Cardiogenic Shock-A Review.

Authors:  Karolina Żbikowska; Krzysztof Wróbel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.