Literature DB >> 25859528

Knowledge and attitudes of general dental practitioners towards posterior composite restorations in northern saudi arabia.

Iftikhar Akbar1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The restoration of posterior teeth with composite restoration is a common clinical practice nowadays. Opinions regarding posterior composite restorations vary among dentists. The aim of the present study was to determine the knowledge and opinions of general dental practitioners towards composite resins for posterior teeth restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was devised to elicit information regarding placement of composite restoration in posterior teeth in northern Saudi Arabia. It was distributed to 230 dentists by hand and e-mail. A response rate 136 (59%) was obtained. The questionnaire sought details about case selection criteria for composite restoration, problems associated with composites and reasons for selecting composite restoration in posterior teeth. The data was processed and analysed by SPSS statistical software 19. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for various responses of the participants.
RESULTS: Regarding the selection of composite restoration in posterior teeth, 97% of the dentists did not prefer composite placement for class I restoration with heavy occlusal contacts. 83% of the participants did not select composite for class II restoration. 78% of the respondents opted for restoring composites in small defects. Patients' aesthetic demands (90%), amalgam replacement (22%) and restoration of endodontically treated teeth (42%) were the contributing factors. Regarding the problems associated with posterior composite restorations. Recurrent caries (87%), post-operative sensitivity (84%), restoration fracture (83%) and polymerization shrinkage (73%) were the major problems reported by respondents associated with composite restorations. The other minor concerns were wear (60%), contact build up in case of class II cavity restorations (51%) and isolation for composite restorations (36%). Conservative cavity preparation (78%), aesthetics (73%) and patient preference (65%) were the main reasons for choosing composite restoration for the posterior teeth.
CONCLUSION: Posterior composites are not popular among dentists practicing in northern Saudi Arabia and there is a need of continued professional education and clinical training for the dentists for posterior composite restorations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Dentists; Posterior restorations; Resin composites

Year:  2015        PMID: 25859528      PMCID: PMC4378811          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11843.5610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  29 in total

Review 1.  An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations.

Authors:  V Deligeorgi; I A Mjör; N H Wilson
Journal:  Prim Dent Care       Date:  2001-01

2.  Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.

Authors:  MaximilianoSérgio Cenci; FlávioFernando Demarco; RicardoMarins de Carvalho
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Posterior composites revisited.

Authors:  André V Ritter
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.843

4.  Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.

Authors:  Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg; Jan W V van Dijken; Ulrika Funegård; Anders Lindberg; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.

Authors:  Niek J M Opdam; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Joost M Roeters; Bas A C Loomans
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  The influence of matrix type on the proximal contact in Class II resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Dimitris Kampouropoulos; Charikleia Paximada; Michalis Loukidis; Afrodite Kakaboura
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.440

7.  22-Year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics.

Authors:  Paulo A Da Rosa Rodolpho; Tiago A Donassollo; Maximiliano S Cenci; Alessandro D Loguércio; Rafael R Moraes; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Niek J M Opdam; Flávio F Demarco
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Survey of Croatian dentists' restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries lesions.

Authors:  Anja Baraba; Sophie Domejean-Orliaguet; Ivar Espelid; Anne B Tveit; Ivana Miletic
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  Is it the end of the road for dental amalgam? A critical review.

Authors:  Arvind Shenoy
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2008-07

10.  Fracture resistance and gap formation of MOD restorations: influence of restorative technique, bevel preparation and water storage.

Authors:  Fábio Herrmann Coelho-De-Souza; Guilherme Brião Camacho; Flávio Fernando Demarco; John M Powers
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.440

View more
  1 in total

1.  Placement of Posterior Composite Restorations: A Cross-Sectional Study of Dental Practitioners in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohamed M Awad; Mansour Alradan; Nawaf Alshalan; Ali Alqahtani; Feras Alhalabi; Mohammed Ali Salem; Ahmed Rabah; Ali Alrahlah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.