Literature DB >> 19477572

Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.

Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg1, Jan W V van Dijken, Ulrika Funegård, Anders Lindberg, Mats Nilsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the selection of direct restorative materials and longevity of replaced restorations in relation to operator and patients characteristics.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of treatment in practice, recording all new placements and replacements of direct restorations was performed during 2 weeks comprising all dentists within the Public Dental Health clinics in the county council of Västerbotten.
RESULTS: A total of 2834 data collection sheets, one for each placed restoration, were received with a dropout of 10%. Restorations analyzed in the study were placed in permanent teeth in patients older than 15 years. First restorations placed due to primary caries were 671 and replacements 1536. Class II was the most frequently treated cavity followed by class I. The median longevity of replaced restorations was for amalgam, resin based composite and glass ionomer 16, 6 and 11 years, respectively. High caries risk patients showed shorter longevity for resin based composite restorations than low or moderate risk patients. Secondary caries as reason for failure for class II resin based composite restorations occurred significantly later than loss or fracture. Significantly longer longevity was observed for replaced restorations executed by more experienced dentists.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of amalgam was negligible and the material was predominantly replaced by resin based composites in first and replaced restorations. Class II was the most frequent placed and replaced restorations. Caries risk and experience of operator influenced longevity of replacements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477572     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  44 in total

1.  Class II composite resin restorations: faster, easier, predictable.

Authors:  R D Jackson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Guidelines for the selection, use, and maintenance of LED light-curing units - Part 1.

Authors:  A C Shortall; R B Price; L MacKenzie; F J T Burke
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  On the fatigue behavior of resin-dentin bonds after degradation by biofilm.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Mutluay; Ke Zhang; Heonjune Ryou; Mobin Yahyazadehfar; Hessam Majd; Hockin H K Xu; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-11-17

4.  Detection of artificial demineralization bordering different types of laminate veneers using visual inspection and storage phosphor radiography.

Authors:  Erhan Cömlekoğlu; Erinç Önem; Mine Dündar Çömlekoğlu; B Güniz Baksı; Ali Mert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Fatigue of the resin-dentin interface: a new approach for evaluating the durability of dentin bonds.

Authors:  Mustafa Murat Mutluay; Mobin Yahyazadehfar; Heonjune Ryou; Hessam Majd; Dominic Do; Dwayne Arola
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can't predict?

Authors:  Jack L Ferracane
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Gene expression and protein synthesis of esterase from Streptococcus mutans are affected by biodegradation by-product from methacrylate resin composites and adhesives.

Authors:  Bo Huang; Lida Sadeghinejad; Olabisi I A Adebayo; Dengbo Ma; Yizhi Xiao; Walter L Siqueira; Dennis G Cvitkovitch; Yoav Finer
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  A randomized clinical trial of class II composite restorations using direct and semidirect techniques.

Authors:  Carlos Rocha Gomes Torres; Mariane Cintra Mailart; Érica Crastechini; Fernanda Alves Feitosa; Stella Renato Machado Esteves; Rebeca Di Nicoló; Alessandra Bühler Borges
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Valeria V Gordan; Joseph L Riley; D Brad Rindal; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey L Fellows; Deborah A Dilbone; Solomon G Brotman; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.634

10.  Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis.

Authors:  Frank Engelhardt; Sebastian Hahnel; Verena Preis; Martin Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.