PURPOSE: This in vitro study evaluated the efficiency of various types of matrices in reconstructing the proximal contact area in Class II resin composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized MO cavities were prepared on artificial molars of a manikin model. Resin composite (Spectrum TPH-3) restorations were placed using the following matrices (n=10): a) circumferential straight metal matrix with Tofflemire retainer-A, b) circumferential pre-contoured metal matrix system-B (Adapt SuperCap), c) circumferential pre-contoured transparent matrix system-C (Adapt SuperCap) and d) sectional pre-contoured metal matrix system-D (Palodent). After completion of each restoration, the manikin model was fixed on a tension-meter apparatus and an orthodontic wire was used to assess the contact tightness (CT), length of contact arc (LCA) and position of contact point relative to LCA% (PCP). The same measurements were performed on a group of intact molars (REF). The results were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and the Tukey test, as well as the unpaired t-test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Matrix D provided the highest CT with the highest LCA, which presented a statistical difference relative to the intact tooth. Restorations with matrix B provided higher LCA than those with matrices A and C, which were found to be comparable to that of an intact tooth. The contact points (PCP) of the filled teeth were located more cervically in matrix D relative to the intact tooth (lower PCP), whereas matrices A, B and C showed more occlusal location (higher PCP). CONCLUSIONS: Differences were noted among all the matrices evaluated and none was proven sufficient to reconstruct the proximal contact characteristics of an intact tooth.
PURPOSE: This in vitro study evaluated the efficiency of various types of matrices in reconstructing the proximal contact area in Class II resin composite restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standardized MO cavities were prepared on artificial molars of a manikin model. Resin composite (Spectrum TPH-3) restorations were placed using the following matrices (n=10): a) circumferential straight metal matrix with Tofflemire retainer-A, b) circumferential pre-contoured metal matrix system-B (Adapt SuperCap), c) circumferential pre-contoured transparent matrix system-C (Adapt SuperCap) and d) sectional pre-contoured metal matrix system-D (Palodent). After completion of each restoration, the manikin model was fixed on a tension-meter apparatus and an orthodontic wire was used to assess the contact tightness (CT), length of contact arc (LCA) and position of contact point relative to LCA% (PCP). The same measurements were performed on a group of intact molars (REF). The results were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA and the Tukey test, as well as the unpaired t-test (alpha=0.05). RESULTS: Matrix D provided the highest CT with the highest LCA, which presented a statistical difference relative to the intact tooth. Restorations with matrix B provided higher LCA than those with matrices A and C, which were found to be comparable to that of an intact tooth. The contact points (PCP) of the filled teeth were located more cervically in matrix D relative to the intact tooth (lower PCP), whereas matrices A, B and C showed more occlusal location (higher PCP). CONCLUSIONS: Differences were noted among all the matrices evaluated and none was proven sufficient to reconstruct the proximal contact characteristics of an intact tooth.