Literature DB >> 25859342

A genome draft of the legless anguid lizard, Ophisaurus gracilis.

Bo Song1, Shifeng Cheng2, Yanbo Sun3, Xiao Zhong1, Jieqiong Jin3, Rui Guan1, Robert W Murphy4, Jing Che3, Yaping Zhang5, Xin Liu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transition from a lizard-like to a snake-like body form is one of the most important transformations in reptilian evolution. The increasing number of sequenced reptilian genomes is enabling a deeper understanding of vertebrate evolution, although the genetic basis of the loss of limbs in reptiles remains enigmatic. Here we report genome sequencing, assembly, and annotation for the Asian glass lizard Ophisaurus gracilis, a limbless lizard species with an elongated snake-like body form. Addition of this species to the genome repository will provide an excellent resource for studying the genetic basis of limb loss and trunk elongation.
FINDINGS: O. gracilis genome sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform resulted in 274.20 Gbp of raw data that was filtered and assembled to a final size of 1.78 Gbp, comprising 6,717 scaffolds with N50 = 1.27 Mbp. Based on the k-mer estimated genome size of 1.71 Gbp, the assembly appears to be nearly 100% complete. A total of 19,513 protein-coding genes were predicted, and 884.06 Mbp of repeat sequences (approximately half of the genome) were annotated. The draft genome of O. gracilis has similar characteristics to both lizard and snake genomes.
CONCLUSIONS: We report the first genome of a lizard from the family Anguidae, O. gracilis. This supplements currently available genetic and genomic resources for amniote vertebrates, representing a major increase in comparative genome data available for squamate reptiles in particular.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anguidae; Limblessness; Lizard genome; Squamate reptiles

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25859342      PMCID: PMC4391233          DOI: 10.1186/s13742-015-0056-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gigascience        ISSN: 2047-217X            Impact factor:   6.524


Data description

Ophiosaurous gracilis genomic DNA was extracted from the tail of a single male lizard collected from the Tibetan Plateau and used to construct seven paired-end Illumina libraries with insert sizes ranging from 180 bp to 20 kbp. To construct small-insert libraries (180, 500, and 800 bp), DNA was sheared to the target size range using Covair S2 (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA) and ligated to adaptors. For long-insert libraries (2, 5, 10, and 20 kb), DNA was fragmented using a Hydroshear system (Digilab, Marlborough, MA, USA). Sheared fragments were biotin labelled at the ends and fragments of the desired size were gel purified. A second round of fragmentation was then conducted before adapter ligation. Both libraries were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 Genome Analyzer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), with 100 bp and 90 bp sequencing for short insert size libraries (180–800 bp) and large insert size libraries (2–20 kbp), respectively. A total of 274.20 Gbp of raw data was generated, from which 147.08 Gbp of ‘clean’ data was obtained after removal of duplicates, contaminated reads (reads with adaptor sequences), low quality reads (with Solexa quality scores (Phred64) of less than 7 for >60% and >80% of bases for short-insert libraries and long-insert libraries, respectively) and reads with more than 10% ‘N’ bases. The O. gracilis genome size was estimated to be approximately 1.71 Gbp using a k-mer-based approach [1]. Based on this estimate, the clean data corresponds to approximately 86-fold coverage of the O. gracilis genome. High-quality reads were used for genome assembly (contig and scaffold construction) and gap closure was performed using the SOAPdenovo package and default parameters except that the k-mer size was set at 63 [2]. The final assembly had a total length of 1.78 Gbp, comprising 6,715 scaffolds assembled from 135,863 contigs, with the longest scaffold size being 6.68 Mbp. The N50 sizes for contigs and scaffolds were 23.41 kbp and 1.27 Mbp, respectively. Given the genome size estimate of 1.71 Gbp, genome coverage by the final assembly was probably complete, although this is probably a slight overestimate due to possible overlaps between some of the scaffolds and/or misassembly of some heterozygous alleles. Completeness of the assembly was confirmed by the successful mapping of up to 97% of reads from short insert libraries. Collectively, this data indicates that almost complete O. gracilis genome coverage was obtained. Protein-coding genes were predicted and annotated by a combination of homology searching and de novo prediction using AUGUSTUS [3]. To search for homologous gene models, the genome assembly was queried against a database containing protein sequences and gene transcripts from three other squamate reptile species (Anolis carolinesis, Ophiophagus hannah, and Python molurus bivittatus) and four other tetrapod vertebrates (Gallus gallus, Homo sapiens, Taeniopygia gutta, and Xenopus tropicalis). This resulted in identification of a total of 19,513 protein-coding genes in the O. gracilis assembly, with an average of seven introns per gene. The gene length ranged from 137 to 96,389 bp, with an average of 1,506 bp; the average exon and intron length was 186 and 3,809 bp, respectively (Table 1).
Table 1

Global statistics of the genome

StatisticValue
Size (Gb)1.71
Scaffold number6,715
Scaffold N50 (Mb)1.27
Gene number19,513
Average gene length (bp)1,506
Average intron number7
Average intron length (bp)3,809
Average exon length (bp)186
Global statistics of the genome Genomic repeat elements in the O. gracilis genome assembly were also identified and annotated. RepeatMasker software version 3.2.7 [4] was used to search for repeat elements using the RepBase library (version 16.10) [5]. We also constructed a de novo repeat sequence database for the O. gracilis genome using LTR-FINDER [6] and RepeatModeler [7], and used this library to identify additional repeat elements using RepeatMasker. By combining the data obtained from both repeat element annotation approaches, a total length of 884.06 Mbp of the O. gracilis genome was identified as repetitive. Repeat annotations accounted for approximately 49.63% of the entire genome assembly, which is remarkably higher than estimates for other squamate reptiles, the anole lizard (~30.4%) [8] and both of the available snake genomes (the python (~27.60%) [9] and cobra (~31.28%) [10]). The repeat element landscape of O. gracilis mostly consists of retrotransposons, including long interspersed elements (LINEs), short interspersed elements (SINEs) and long terminal repeats (LTRs). LINEs represented the most abundant class of retrotransposons, occupying 37.65% of the genome, while the other repeat elements (SINE and LTR) comprised 1.80% and 6.44%, respectively (Table 2). DNA transposons were particularly rare, forming only 3.2% of the genome.
Table 2

Summary of mobile element types

TypeLength (kb)Percentage of genome (%)
DNA56,8743.19
LINE670,61937.65
SINE32,0191.80
LTR114,7396.44
Other1770.01
Unknown160,5459.01
Total884,05749.63
Summary of mobile element types In summary, we report the first annotated anguid lizard genome sequence assembly, to supplement the existing amniote genome resources in which squamate reptile sequences are sparsely represented. Despite the distant phylogenetic relationship [11], the morphology of the Asian glass lizard O. gracilis is highly convergent with that of snakes, including the lack of limbs and an elongated body. We therefore expect the genome of this species to be particularly useful for future comparative genomic analyses to identify the molecular basis of limb loss and body form evolution in squamate reptiles, and vertebrates in general.

Availability of supporting data

Supporting data is available in the GigaScience repository, GigaDB [12], and raw data in the SRP052050.
  10 in total

Review 1.  Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements.

Authors:  J Jurka; V V Kapitonov; A Pavlicek; P Klonowski; O Kohany; J Walichiewicz
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences.

Authors:  G Benson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes.

Authors:  R Alexander Pyron; Frank T Burbrink; John J Wiens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome.

Authors:  Ruiqiang Li; Wei Fan; Geng Tian; Hongmei Zhu; Lin He; Jing Cai; Quanfei Huang; Qingle Cai; Bo Li; Yinqi Bai; Zhihe Zhang; Yaping Zhang; Wen Wang; Jun Li; Fuwen Wei; Heng Li; Min Jian; Jianwen Li; Zhaolei Zhang; Rasmus Nielsen; Dawei Li; Wanjun Gu; Zhentao Yang; Zhaoling Xuan; Oliver A Ryder; Frederick Chi-Ching Leung; Yan Zhou; Jianjun Cao; Xiao Sun; Yonggui Fu; Xiaodong Fang; Xiaosen Guo; Bo Wang; Rong Hou; Fujun Shen; Bo Mu; Peixiang Ni; Runmao Lin; Wubin Qian; Guodong Wang; Chang Yu; Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Zhigang Wu; Huiqing Liang; Jiumeng Min; Qi Wu; Shifeng Cheng; Jue Ruan; Mingwei Wang; Zhongbin Shi; Ming Wen; Binghang Liu; Xiaoli Ren; Huisong Zheng; Dong Dong; Kathleen Cook; Gao Shan; Hao Zhang; Carolin Kosiol; Xueying Xie; Zuhong Lu; Hancheng Zheng; Yingrui Li; Cynthia C Steiner; Tommy Tsan-Yuk Lam; Siyuan Lin; Qinghui Zhang; Guoqing Li; Jing Tian; Timing Gong; Hongde Liu; Dejin Zhang; Lin Fang; Chen Ye; Juanbin Zhang; Wenbo Hu; Anlong Xu; Yuanyuan Ren; Guojie Zhang; Michael W Bruford; Qibin Li; Lijia Ma; Yiran Guo; Na An; Yujie Hu; Yang Zheng; Yongyong Shi; Zhiqiang Li; Qing Liu; Yanling Chen; Jing Zhao; Ning Qu; Shancen Zhao; Feng Tian; Xiaoling Wang; Haiyin Wang; Lizhi Xu; Xiao Liu; Tomas Vinar; Yajun Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shiping Liu; Hemin Zhang; Desheng Li; Yan Huang; Xia Wang; Guohua Yang; Zhi Jiang; Junyi Wang; Nan Qin; Li Li; Jingxiang Li; Lars Bolund; Karsten Kristiansen; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Maynard Olson; Xiuqing Zhang; Songgang Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The Burmese python genome reveals the molecular basis for extreme adaptation in snakes.

Authors:  Todd A Castoe; A P Jason de Koning; Kathryn T Hall; Daren C Card; Drew R Schield; Matthew K Fujita; Robert P Ruggiero; Jack F Degner; Juan M Daza; Wanjun Gu; Jacobo Reyes-Velasco; Kyle J Shaney; Jill M Castoe; Samuel E Fox; Alex W Poole; Daniel Polanco; Jason Dobry; Michael W Vandewege; Qing Li; Ryan K Schott; Aurélie Kapusta; Patrick Minx; Cédric Feschotte; Peter Uetz; David A Ray; Federico G Hoffmann; Robert Bogden; Eric N Smith; Belinda S W Chang; Freek J Vonk; Nicholas R Casewell; Christiaan V Henkel; Michael K Richardson; Stephen P Mackessy; Anne M Bronikowski; Anne M Bronikowsi; Mark Yandell; Wesley C Warren; Stephen M Secor; David D Pollock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system.

Authors:  Freek J Vonk; Nicholas R Casewell; Christiaan V Henkel; Alysha M Heimberg; Hans J Jansen; Ryan J R McCleary; Harald M E Kerkkamp; Rutger A Vos; Isabel Guerreiro; Juan J Calvete; Wolfgang Wüster; Anthony E Woods; Jessica M Logan; Robert A Harrison; Todd A Castoe; A P Jason de Koning; David D Pollock; Mark Yandell; Diego Calderon; Camila Renjifo; Rachel B Currier; David Salgado; Davinia Pla; Libia Sanz; Asad S Hyder; José M C Ribeiro; Jan W Arntzen; Guido E E J M van den Thillart; Marten Boetzer; Walter Pirovano; Ron P Dirks; Herman P Spaink; Denis Duboule; Edwina McGlinn; R Manjunatha Kini; Michael K Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel.

Authors:  Mario Stanke; Stephan Waack
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals.

Authors:  Jessica Alföldi; Federica Di Palma; Manfred Grabherr; Christina Williams; Lesheng Kong; Evan Mauceli; Pamela Russell; Craig B Lowe; Richard E Glor; Jacob D Jaffe; David A Ray; Stephane Boissinot; Andrew M Shedlock; Christopher Botka; Todd A Castoe; John K Colbourne; Matthew K Fujita; Ricardo Godinez Moreno; Boudewijn F ten Hallers; David Haussler; Andreas Heger; David Heiman; Daniel E Janes; Jeremy Johnson; Pieter J de Jong; Maxim Y Koriabine; Marcia Lara; Peter A Novick; Chris L Organ; Sally E Peach; Steven Poe; David D Pollock; Kevin de Queiroz; Thomas Sanger; Steve Searle; Jeremy D Smith; Zachary Smith; Ross Swofford; Jason Turner-Maier; Juli Wade; Sarah Young; Amonida Zadissa; Scott V Edwards; Travis C Glenn; Christopher J Schneider; Jonathan B Losos; Eric S Lander; Matthew Breen; Chris P Ponting; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A genome draft of the legless anguid lizard, Ophisaurus gracilis.

Authors:  Bo Song; Shifeng Cheng; Yanbo Sun; Xiao Zhong; Jieqiong Jin; Rui Guan; Robert W Murphy; Jing Che; Yaping Zhang; Xin Liu
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Comparative genomic investigation of high-elevation adaptation in ectothermic snakes.

Authors:  Jia-Tang Li; Yue-Dong Gao; Liang Xie; Cao Deng; Peng Shi; Meng-Long Guan; Song Huang; Jin-Long Ren; Dong-Dong Wu; Li Ding; Zi-Yan Huang; Hu Nie; Devon P Humphreys; David M Hillis; Wen-Zhi Wang; Ya-Ping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Appendages and gene regulatory networks: Lessons from the limbless.

Authors:  Carlos R Infante; Ashley M Rasys; Douglas B Menke
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 2.487

3.  A genome draft of the legless anguid lizard, Ophisaurus gracilis.

Authors:  Bo Song; Shifeng Cheng; Yanbo Sun; Xiao Zhong; Jieqiong Jin; Rui Guan; Robert W Murphy; Jing Che; Yaping Zhang; Xin Liu
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 6.524

4.  Genomic Signatures of Historical Allopatry and Ecological Divergence in an Island Lizard.

Authors:  Richard P Brown; Steve Paterson; Judith Risse
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 5.  Evolution and Diversity of Transposable Elements in Vertebrate Genomes.

Authors:  Cibele G Sotero-Caio; Roy N Platt; Alexander Suh; David A Ray
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Comparative Genomics Reveals Accelerated Evolution in Conserved Pathways during the Diversification of Anole Lizards.

Authors:  Marc Tollis; Elizabeth D Hutchins; Jessica Stapley; Shawn M Rupp; Walter L Eckalbar; Inbar Maayan; Eris Lasku; Carlos R Infante; Stuart R Dennis; Joel A Robertson; Catherine M May; Michael R Crusoe; Eldredge Bermingham; Dale F DeNardo; Shi-Tong Tonia Hsieh; Rob J Kulathinal; William Owen McMillan; Douglas B Menke; Stephen C Pratt; Jeffery Alan Rawls; Oris Sanjur; Jeanne Wilson-Rawls; Melissa A Wilson Sayres; Rebecca E Fisher; Kenro Kusumi
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Anchoring genome sequence to chromosomes of the central bearded dragon (Pogona vitticeps) enables reconstruction of ancestral squamate macrochromosomes and identifies sequence content of the Z chromosome.

Authors:  Janine E Deakin; Melanie J Edwards; Hardip Patel; Denis O'Meally; Jinmin Lian; Rachael Stenhouse; Sam Ryan; Alexandra M Livernois; Bhumika Azad; Clare E Holleley; Qiye Li; Arthur Georges
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  The genome of the tegu lizard Salvator merianae: combining Illumina, PacBio, and optical mapping data to generate a highly contiguous assembly.

Authors:  Juliana G Roscito; Katrin Sameith; Martin Pippel; Kees-Jan Francoijs; Sylke Winkler; Andreas Dahl; Georg Papoutsoglou; Gene Myers; Michael Hiller
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.524

9.  Optimizing Phylogenomics with Rapidly Evolving Long Exons: Comparison with Anchored Hybrid Enrichment and Ultraconserved Elements.

Authors:  Benjamin R Karin; Tony Gamble; Todd R Jackman
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Chromosome-Level Assembly of the Common Lizard (Zootoca vivipara) Genome.

Authors:  Andrey A Yurchenko; Hans Recknagel; Kathryn R Elmer
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.