Literature DB >> 25858447

Native language experience shapes neural basis of addressed and assembled phonologies.

Leilei Mei1, Gui Xue2, Zhong-Lin Lu3, Qinghua He4, Miao Wei5, Mingxia Zhang2, Qi Dong2, Chuansheng Chen6.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested differential engagement of addressed and assembled phonologies in reading Chinese and alphabetic languages (e.g., English) and the modulatory role of native language in learning to read a second language. However, it is not clear whether native language experience shapes the neural mechanisms of addressed and assembled phonologies. To address this question, we trained native Chinese and native English speakers to read the same artificial language (based on Korean Hangul) either through addressed (i.e., whole-word mapping) or assembled (i.e., grapheme-to-phoneme mapping) phonology. We found that, for both native Chinese and native English speakers, addressed phonology relied on the regions in the ventral pathway, whereas assembled phonology depended on the regions in the dorsal pathway. More importantly, we found that the neural mechanisms of addressed and assembled phonologies were shaped by native language experience. Specifically, one key region for addressed phonology (i.e., the left middle temporal gyrus) showed greater activation for addressed phonology in native Chinese speakers, while one key region for assembled phonology (i.e., the left supramarginal gyrus) showed more activation for assembled phonology in native English speakers. These results provide direct neuroimaging evidence for the effect of native language experience on the neural mechanisms of phonological access in a new language and support the assimilation-accommodation hypothesis.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Addressed phonology; Assembled phonology; Cross-cultural differences; Word reading; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25858447      PMCID: PMC4446231          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  67 in total

1.  A cultural effect on brain function.

Authors:  E Paulesu; E McCrory; F Fazio; L Menoncello; N Brunswick; S F Cappa; M Cotelli; G Cossu; F Corte; M Lorusso; S Pesenti; A Gallagher; D Perani; C Price; C D Frith; U Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Effects of lexicality, frequency, and spelling-to-sound consistency on the functional anatomy of reading.

Authors:  J A Fiez; D A Balota; M E Raichle; S E Petersen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Semantic versus perceptual priming in fusiform cortex.

Authors:  K Grill-Spector
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Alphabetic and nonalphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: a comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners.

Authors:  Min Wang; Keiko Koda; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-03

5.  Neural systems of second language reading are shaped by native language.

Authors:  Li Hai Tan; John A Spinks; Ching-Mei Feng; Wai Ting Siok; Charles A Perfetti; Jinhu Xiong; Peter T Fox; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Effects of word form on brain processing of written Chinese.

Authors:  Shimin Fu; Yiping Chen; Stephen Smith; Susan Iversen; P M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  An fMRI study with semantic access in low proficiency second language learners.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Zhen Jin; Lei Zhang; Yue Wang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Can cognitive models explain brain activation during word and pseudoword reading? A meta-analysis of 36 neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  J S H Taylor; Kathleen Rastle; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Orthographic transparency modulates the functional asymmetry in the fusiform cortex: an artificial language training study.

Authors:  Leilei Mei; Gui Xue; Zhong-Lin Lu; Qinghua He; Mingxia Zhang; Feng Xue; Chuansheng Chen; Qi Dong
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Matching is not naming: a direct comparison of lexical manipulations in explicit and implicit reading tasks.

Authors:  Alecia C Vogel; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  6 in total

1.  Lexical learning in a new language leads to neural pattern similarity with word reading in native language.

Authors:  Huiling Li; Jing Qu; Chuansheng Chen; Yanjun Chen; Gui Xue; Lei Zhang; Chengrou Lu; Leilei Mei
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Neurobiological bases of reading disorder Part I: Etiological investigations.

Authors:  Zhichao Xia; Roeland Hancock; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2017-04-23

3.  Neural representational similarity between L1 and L2 in spoken and written language processing.

Authors:  Say Young Kim; Lanfang Liu; Li Liu; Fan Cao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural representation of phonological information during Chinese character reading.

Authors:  Aqian Li; Rui Yang; Jing Qu; Jie Dong; Lala Gu; Leilei Mei
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 5.399

5.  Origins of Dissociations in the English Past Tense: A Synthetic Brain Imaging Model.

Authors:  Gert Westermann; Samuel Jones
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-02

6.  Language distance in orthographic transparency affects cross-language pattern similarity between native and non-native languages.

Authors:  Jie Dong; Aqian Li; Chuansheng Chen; Jing Qu; Nan Jiang; Yue Sun; Liyuan Hu; Leilei Mei
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 5.399

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.