Literature DB >> 1462538

Predicting risk for medical malpractice claims using quality-of-care characteristics.

S C Charles1, R D Gibbons, P R Frisch, C E Pyskoty, D Hedeker, N K Singha.   

Abstract

The current fault-based tort system assumes that claims made against physicians are inversely related to the quality of care they provide. In this study we identified physician characteristics associated with elements of medical care that make physicians vulnerable to malpractice claims. A sample of physicians (n = 248) thought to be at high or low risk for claims was surveyed on various personal and professional characteristics. Statistical analysis showed that 9 characteristics predicted risk group. High risk was associated with increased age, surgical specialty, emergency department coverage, increased days away from practice, and the feeling that the litigation climate was "unfair." Low risk was associated with scheduling enough time to talk with patients, answering patients' telephone calls directly, feeling "satisfied" with practice arrangements, and acknowledging greater emotional distress. Prediction was more accurate for physicians in practice 15 years or less. We conclude that a relationship exists between a history of malpractice claims and selected physician characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1462538      PMCID: PMC1011304     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  24 in total

1.  The malpractice claims experience of physicians investigated for inappropriate prescribing.

Authors:  J D Bloom; M H Williams; L Kofoed; C Rhyne; M Resnick
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-09

Review 2.  Individual and institutional variables which may serve as indicators of quality of medical care.

Authors:  R H Palmer; M C Reilly
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  The Michigan alcoholism screening test: the quest for a new diagnostic instrument.

Authors:  M L Selzer
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Physicians' self-reports of reactions to malpractice litigation.

Authors:  S C Charles; J R Wilbert; E C Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  How patients appraise physicians.

Authors:  N Cousins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Predicting the appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and coronary angiography.

Authors:  R H Brook; R E Park; M R Chassin; D H Solomon; J Keesey; J Kosecoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients.

Authors:  R S Shapiro; D E Simpson; S L Lawrence; A M Talsky; K A Sobocinski; D L Schiedermayer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-10

8.  Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I.

Authors:  T A Brennan; L L Leape; N M Laird; L Hebert; A R Localio; A G Lawthers; J P Newhouse; P C Weiler; H H Hiatt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Self-perception of the elective surgeon and some patient perception correlates.

Authors:  M R Wright
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1980-08

10.  Measuring clinical performance of individual internists in office and hospital practice.

Authors:  P J Sanazaro; R M Worth
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  6 in total

1.  Characteristics of surgeons with high and low malpractice claims rates.

Authors:  T E Adamson; D C Baldwin; T J Sheehan; A A Oppenberg
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1997-01

2.  Role of previous claims and specialty on the effectiveness of risk-management education for office-based physicians.

Authors:  P R Frisch; S C Charles; R D Gibbons; D Hedeker
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-10

3.  Reasons for and Facilitating Factors of Medical Malpractice Complaints. What Can Be Done to Prevent Them?

Authors:  Bianca Hanganu; Magdalena Iorga; Iulia-Diana Muraru; Beatrice Gabriela Ioan
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Engagement, not personal characteristics, was associated with the seriousness of regulatory adjudication decisions about physicians: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Javier A Caballero; Steve P Brown
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  Socio-Demographic, Professional and Institutional Characteristics That Make Romanian Doctors More Prone to Malpractice Complaints.

Authors:  Bianca Hanganu; Magdalena Iorga; Lavinia Maria Pop; Beatrice Gabriela Ioan
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Why Are Patients Unhappy with Their Healthcare? A Romanian Physicians' Perspective.

Authors:  Bianca Hanganu; Irina Smaranda Manoilescu; Cristian Paparau; Laura Gheuca-Solovastru; Camelia Liana Buhas; Andreea Silvana Szalontay; Beatrice Gabriela Ioan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.