Literature DB >> 25855165

The role of the posterior cerebellum in saccadic adaptation: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Muriel T N Panouillères1, R Chris Miall2, Ned Jenkinson3.   

Abstract

The posterior vermis of the cerebellum is considered to be critically involved in saccadic adaptation. However, recent evidence suggests that the adaptive decrease (backward adaptation) and the adaptive increase (forward adaptation) of saccade amplitude rely on partially separate neural substrates. We investigated whether the posterior cerebellum could be differentially involved in backward and forward adaptation by using transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS). To do so, participants' saccades were adapted backward or forward while they received anodal, cathodal, or sham TDCS. In two extra groups, subjects underwent a nonadaptation session while receiving anodal or cathodal TDCS to control for the direct effects of TDCS on saccadic execution. Surprisingly, cathodal stimulation tended to increase the extent of both forward and backward adaptations, while anodal TDCS strongly impaired forward adaptation and, to a smaller extent, backward adaptation. Forward adaptation was accompanied by a greater increase in velocity with cathodal stimulation, and reduced duration of change for anodal stimulation. In contrast, the expected velocity decrease in backward adaptation was noticeably weaker with anodal stimulation. Stimulation applied during nonadaptation sessions did not affect saccadic gain, velocity, or duration, demonstrating that the reported effects are not due to direct effects of the stimulation on the generation of eye movements. Our results demonstrate that cerebellar excitability is critical for saccadic adaptation. Based on our results and the growing evidence from studies of vestibulo-ocular reflex and saccadic adaptation, we conclude that the plasticity at the level of the oculomotor vermis is more fundamentally important for forward adaptation than for backward adaptation.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/355471-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TDCS; adaptation; cerebellum; saccades

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25855165      PMCID: PMC4388915          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4064-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  62 in total

1.  Adaptive modification of saccade size produces correlated changes in the discharges of fastigial nucleus neurons.

Authors:  Charles A Scudder; David M McGee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Enduring dysmetria and impaired gain adaptivity of saccadic eye movements in Wallenberg's lateral medullary syndrome.

Authors:  W Waespe; R Baumgartner
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Memory of learning facilitates saccadic adaptation in the monkey.

Authors:  Yoshiko Kojima; Yoshiki Iwamoto; Kaoru Yoshida
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Active reversal of motor memories reveals rules governing memory encoding.

Authors:  Edward S Boyden; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Characteristics of saccadic gain adaptation in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  A Straube; A F Fuchs; S Usher; F R Robinson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Questions in modeling the cerebellum.

Authors:  M Ito
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1982-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Mechanisms underlying cerebellar motor deficits due to mGluR1-autoantibodies.

Authors:  Michiel Coesmans; Peter A Sillevis Smitt; David J Linden; Ryuichi Shigemoto; Tomoo Hirano; Yoshinori Yamakawa; Adriaan M van Alphen; Chongde Luo; Josef N van der Geest; Johan M Kros; Carlo A Gaillard; Maarten A Frens; Chris I de Zeeuw
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.422

8.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation.

Authors:  T A Martin; J G Keating; H P Goodkin; A J Bastian; W T Thach
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Visuomotor adaptive improvement and aftereffects are impaired differentially following cerebellar lesions in SCA and PICA territory.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Otmar Bock; Elke R Gizewski; Beate Schoch; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Hereditary cerebellar ataxia progressively impairs force adaptation during goal-directed arm movements.

Authors:  Matthias Maschke; Christopher M Gomez; Timothy J Ebner; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  19 in total

1.  Impaired Motor Learning in a Disorder of the Inferior Olive: Is the Cerebellum Confused?

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Aaron L Wong; Lance M Optican; David S Zee
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Cerebellar tDCS dissociates the timing of perceptual decisions from perceptual change in speech.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; James Bonaiuto; Sven Bestmann; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Angela Voegtle; Clara Terlutter; Katharina Nikolai; Amr Farahat; Hermann Hinrichs; Catherine M Sweeney-Reed
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.648

5.  Neuronal representation of saccadic error in macaque posterior parietal cortex (PPC).

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Yining Liu; Haidong Lu; Si Wu; Mingsha Zhang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Reversing motor adaptation deficits in the ageing brain using non-invasive stimulation.

Authors:  Muriel T N Panouillères; Raed A Joundi; John-Stuart Brittain; Ned Jenkinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  tDCS of the Cerebellum: Where Do We Stand in 2016? Technical Issues and Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian C A A Bodranghien; Peter Mariën; Mario U Manto
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Visual Space Constructed by Saccade Motor Maps.

Authors:  Eckart Zimmermann; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Visuomotor learning from postdictive motor error.

Authors:  Jana Masselink; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Saccadic Adaptation in 10-41 Month-Old Children.

Authors:  Christelle Lemoine-Lardennois; Nadia Alahyane; Coline Tailhefer; Thérèse Collins; Jacqueline Fagard; Karine Doré-Mazars
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.