Literature DB >> 25854189

[Total knee arthroplasty in 2014 : Results, expectations, and complications].

G Matziolis1, E Röhner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening seems to have become a minor problem in total knee arthroplasty. In contrast to that, new challenges are defined by changing patients' expectations. Beside reduction of pain and improving mobility, modern implants should not be noticed as such and should not limit sports activities.
OBJECTIVES: In this paper, a summary of the development and the current situation of total knee arthroplasty (e.g., implantation numbers, hospitality, operation time, and infection rates) are provided. The data are compared in an international context. In addition, current trends and developments from recent years are shown and rated according to the literature.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The paper is based on a literature search (PubMed) and analyses of published official statistical data and expert recommendations.
RESULTS: Implantation numbers have been declining gradually in Germany since 2009. In 2013, 127,077 total knee arthroplasties were implanted. In contrast, the number of revision operations has increased gradually during the last decade. In addition, hospital stay and operation time have declined.
CONCLUSION: The development of implants, instruments, and operation techniques results from changing patients' expectations. All innovations must be compared against the results of well-proven techniques. The arthroplasty register may be an instrument to evaluate the results of new techniques and implants in a broad clinical application in terms of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25854189     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-015-3080-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  30 in total

1.  Optical analysis of surface changes on early retrievals of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene tibial inserts.

Authors:  Orhun K Muratoglu; Jeff Ruberti; Suzi Melotti; Stephen H Spiegelberg; Evan S Greenbaum; William H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  I can't get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons.

Authors:  M J Dunbar; G Richardson; O Robertsson
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Alignment for total knee replacement: a comparison of kinematic axis versus mechanical axis techniques. A cadaver study.

Authors:  Michael Nogler; William Hozack; Dermot Collopy; Eckart Mayr; Gregory Deirmengian; Kathrin Sekyra
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A highly crosslinked UHMWPE for CR and PS total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Aiguo Wang; Shi-Shen Yau; Aaron Essner; Lizeth Herrera; Michael Manley; John Dumbleton
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology.

Authors:  V Krenn; L Morawietz; G Perino; H Kienapfel; R Ascherl; G J Hassenpflug; M Thomsen; P Thomas; M Huber; D Kendoff; D Baumhoer; M G Krukemeyer; S Natu; F Boettner; J Zustin; B Kölbel; W Rüther; J P Kretzer; A Tiemann; A Trampuz; L Frommelt; R Tichilow; S Söder; S Müller; J Parvizi; U Illgner; T Gehrke
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Evolution of customization design for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  John Slamin; Brian Parsley
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-12

Review 7.  The use of highly cross-linked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Mark R Geyer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 8.  Pragmatic approach to the clinical work-up of patients with putative allergic disease to metallic orthopaedic implants before and after surgery.

Authors:  J P Thyssen; T Menné; P C Schalock; J S Taylor; H I Maibach
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Does computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty improve the overall component position and patient function?

Authors:  Charlotte L Allen; Gary J Hooper; Byron J Oram; J Elizabeth Wells
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Comparative responsiveness of outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Giesinger; D F Hamilton; B Jost; B Holzner; J M Giesinger
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 6.576

View more
  3 in total

1.  [5-year follow-up of 210 Columbus knee prostheses : A prospective multicentre study].

Authors:  Andreas Fuchs; Philip Häussermann; Dirk Hömig; Björn Gunnar Ochs; Christof A Müller; Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Tranexamic acid use and risk of thrombosis in regular users ofantithrombotics undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospectivecohort study.

Authors:  Hervé Hourlier; Peter Fennema
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  10-year follow-up of the Columbus knee prostheses system in a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Andreas Fuchs; Philip Häussermann; Dirk Hömig; Björn Gunnar Ochs; Tim Klopfer; Christof A Müller; Peter Helwig; Lukas Konstantinidis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 2.928

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.