Literature DB >> 24187375

I can't get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons.

M J Dunbar1, G Richardson, O Robertsson.   

Abstract

Satisfaction is increasingly employed as an outcome measure for a successful total knee replacement (TKR). Satisfaction as an outcome measure encompasses many different intrinsic and extrinsic factors related to a person's experience before and after TKR. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry has previously demonstrated on a large population study that 17% of TKR recipients are not satisfied with their TKR outcome. This finding has been replicated in other countries. Similar significant factors emerged from these registry studies that are related to satisfaction. It would appear that satisfaction is better after more chronic diseases and whether the TKR results in pain relief or improved function. Importantly, unmet pre-operative expectations are a significant predictor for dissatisfaction following a TKR. It may be possible to improve rates by addressing the issues surrounding pain, function and expectation before embarking on surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Expectations; Knee; Outcomes; Registry; Satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24187375     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  57 in total

Review 1.  Bicruciate retaining.

Authors:  Andrea Trecci
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

2.  Association of handgrip strength with patient-reported outcome measures after total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jennifer M T A Meessen; Marta Fiocco; Rutger L Tordoir; Arnout Sjer; Suzan H M Verdegaal; P Eline Slagboom; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  [Total knee arthroplasty in 2014 : Results, expectations, and complications].

Authors:  G Matziolis; E Röhner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [The S2k guideline: Indications for knee endoprosthesis : Evidence and consent-based indications for total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  J Lützner; T Lange; J Schmitt; C Kopkow; M Aringer; E Böhle; H Bork; K Dreinhöfer; N Friederich; S Gravius; K-D Heller; R Hube; E Gromnica-Ihle; S Kirschner; B Kladny; M Kremer; M Linke; J Malzahn; R Sabatowski; H-P Scharf; J Stöve; R Wagner; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Higher Preoperative Patient Activation Associated With Better Patient-reported Outcomes After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  John Andrawis; Sina Akhavan; Vanessa Chan; Mandeep Lehil; Dana Pong; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Conventional instruments are more accurate for measuring the depth of the tibial cut than computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective study.

Authors:  Antonio Klasan; Sven Edward Putnis; Samuel Grasso; Thomas Neri; Myles Raphael Coolican
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 7.  [Objectifying results in total knee arthroplasty: Is "patient satisfaction" adequate].

Authors:  C Kopkow; J Schmitt; E Haase; T Lange; K-P Günther; J Lützner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Changes in anteroposterior stability and proprioception after different types of knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Delphine Wautier; Emmanuel Thienpont
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing discrepancy between patients' pre-surgery expectations and abilities and post-surgical outcomes following knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Pazit Levinger; Neil T Diamond; Hylton B Menz; Elin Wee; Soula Margelis; Andrew G Stewart; John R Bartlett; Neil B Bergman; Stephen McMahon; David L Hare; Keith Hill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Predictors of disease-specific quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Arjen Kolk; Nienke Wolterbeek; Kiem Gie Auw Yang; Jacco A C Zijl; Ronald N Wessel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.