Literature DB >> 25454771

Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology.

V Krenn1, L Morawietz2, G Perino3, H Kienapfel4, R Ascherl5, G J Hassenpflug6, M Thomsen7, P Thomas8, M Huber9, D Kendoff10, D Baumhoer11, M G Krukemeyer12, S Natu13, F Boettner14, J Zustin15, B Kölbel16, W Rüther17, J P Kretzer18, A Tiemann19, A Trampuz20, L Frommelt21, R Tichilow22, S Söder23, S Müller16, J Parvizi24, U Illgner25, T Gehrke10.   

Abstract

This extended classification of joint implant related pathology is a practical histopathologic classification based on defined morphological criteria covering the complete spectrum of pathohistologic changes in periprosthetic tissues. These changes may occur as a consequence of endoprosthetic replacement of large joints and may lead to a reduction in the prosthesis survival rate. We describe the established consensus classification of the periprosthetic membrane, in which aseptic and septic prosthetic loosening can be subdivided into four histological types, as well as histopathological criteria for additional significant pathologies including endoprosthetic-associated arthrofibrosis, particle-induced immunological, inflammatory and toxic mechanisms (adverse reactions), and bone tissue pathologies. These characteristic tissue alterations and their relationships are summarized in the extended classification. Since particle heterogeneity in periprosthetic tissue is high and particle identification is a necessary part of diagnosis, the identification of different types of particles is described in the histopathological particle algorithm. The morphological qualities of prosthetic material particles and the demarcation between abrasion and non-abrasion endogenous particles are also summarized. This feasible classification which is based on low cost standard tissue processing and examination and on well-defined diagnostic criteria is a solid platform for the histological diagnosis of implant associated pathologies providing a stable and reproducible tool for the surgical pathologist. Since this classification is suitable for standardized histopathological diagnostics, it might also provide a useful data set for joint arthroplasty registers, particularly for registers based on so-called routine data.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse reactions; Arthrofibrosis; Endoprosthesis material; Joint arthroplasty registers; Joint implant failure; Neo-synovium; Particle disease; Particle identification; Periprosthetic infection; Periprosthetic membrane; SLIM

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25454771     DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Res Pract        ISSN: 0344-0338            Impact factor:   3.250


  95 in total

1.  [Synovial biomarkers for differential diagnosis of painful arthroplasty].

Authors:  I J Banke; N Stade; P M Prodinger; H M Mühlhofer; P Thomas; B Thomas; B Summer; M van Griensven; R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  [Management of periprosthetic infections of the knee].

Authors:  N Renz; C Perka; A Trampuz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  [Implant-associated infections - Diagnostics].

Authors:  N Renz; M Müller; C Perka; A Trampuz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  [CD15 focus score for diagnostics of periprosthetic joint infections : Neutrophilic granulocytes quantification mode and the development of morphometric software (CD15 quantifier)].

Authors:  B Kölbel; S Wienert; J Dimitriadis; D Kendoff; T Gehrke; M Huber; L Frommelt; A Tiemann; K Saeger; V Krenn
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  [Total knee arthroplasty in 2014 : Results, expectations, and complications].

Authors:  G Matziolis; E Röhner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article.

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; Lisa Renner; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 7.  Diagnostic parameters in periprosthetic infections: the current state of the literature.

Authors:  G Mattiassich; R Ortmaier; F Rittenschober; J Hochreiter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-15

8.  [Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement and conversion to ankle arthrodesis].

Authors:  M D Wimmer; M Hettchen; M M Ploeger; B Hintermann; D C Wirtz; A Barg
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Failure analysis of infection persistence after septic revision surgery: a checklist algorithm for risk factors in knee and hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sofia Kilgus; Daniel Karczewski; Cindy Passkönig; Tobias Winkler; Doruk Akgün; Carsten Perka; Michael Müller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  [Bone defect adjusted strategy in revision arthroplasty of the hip : Wich implant in wich situation? Innovations and approved methods].

Authors:  B S Craiovan; J Grifka; A Keshmiri; B Moser; M Wörner; T Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.