| Literature DB >> 25853056 |
Patrícia D da S Fonseca1, Fábio R P de Souza2, Gregório M F de Camargo1, Fernanda M M Gil1, Diercles F Cardoso1, Larissa Zetouni1, Camila U Braz1, Arione A Boligon3, Renata H Branco4, Lucia G de Albuquerque1, Maria E Z Mercadante4, Humberto Tonhati1.
Abstract
In beef cattle farming, growth and carcass traits are important for genetic breeding programs. Molecular markers can be used to assist selection and increase genetic gain. The ADIPOQ, OLR1 and PPARGC1A genes are involved in lipid synthesis and fat accumulation in adipose tissue. The objective of this study was to identify polymorphisms in these genes and to assess the association with growth and carcass traits in Nelore cattle. A total of 639 animals were genotyped by PCR-RFLP for rs208549452, rs109019599 and rs109163366 in ADIPOQ, OLR1 and PPARGC1A gene, respectively. We analyzed the association of SNPs identified with birth weight, weaning weight, female yearling weight, female hip height, male yearling weight, male hip height, loin eye area, rump fat thickness, and backfat thickness. The OLR1 marker was associated with rump fat thickness and weaning weight (P < 0.05) and the PPARGC1 marker was associated with female yearling weight.Entities:
Keywords: Bos taurus indicus; Molecular markers; PCR-RFLP; SNP
Year: 2015 PMID: 25853056 PMCID: PMC4354916 DOI: 10.1016/j.mgene.2015.02.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Meta Gene ISSN: 2214-5400
Mean of each trait obtained for the three lines.
| Trait | NeC | NeS | NeT | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| BW (kg) | 25.12 | (3.6) | 32.05 | (5.3) | 32.23 | (4.9) |
| W210 (kg) | 158.54 | (24) | 190.7 | (30.7) | 197.80 | (30.1) |
| W550 (kg) | 253.86 | (23.8) | 312.55 | (33.1) | 315.03 | (42.3) |
| H550 (cm) | 127.42 | (3.9) | 134.81 | (3.9) | 134.15 | (4.6) |
| H378 (cm) | 125.05 | (2.8) | 133.16 | (5.0) | 133.01 | (4.1) |
| W378 (kg) | 280.15 | (25.2) | 351.84 | (36.3) | 357.12 | (37.2) |
| LEA (cm2) | 45.41 | (5.5) | 46.64 | (7.3) | 49.36 | (6.9) |
| BF (mm) | 1.67 | (0.6) | 1.76 | (0.6) | 1.78 | (0.8) |
| RF (mm) | 3.98 | (1.9) | 4.39 | (1.9) | 4.51 | (1.9) |
Markers allele and genotype frequencies in the three Nelore lines selected for growth.
| Marker (gene)/line | Genotype frequency | Allele frequency | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs208549452 (ADIPOQ) | TT | TC | CC | T | C |
| NeC | 0.41 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.53 | 0.47 |
| NeS | 0.42 | 0.22 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.47 |
| NeT | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.58 |
| rs109019599 ( | AA | AC | CC | A | C |
| NeC | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.72 | 0.17 | 0.83 |
| NeS | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.82 | 0.11 | 0.89 |
| NeT | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.70 | 0.21 | 0.79 |
| rs109163366 ( | AA | AC | CC | A | C |
| NeC | 0.69 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.78 | 0.22 |
| NeS | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.13 | 0.68 | 0.32 |
| NeT | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.12 | 0.63 | 0.37 |
Comparison of allelic frequencies between the selection lines (P value, Fisher's exact test).
| P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Population pair | rs208549452 ( | rs109019599 ( | rs109163366 ( |
| NeC vs NeT | < 0.007 | 0.42 | < 0.0003 |
| NeC vs NeS | 0.92 | 0.27 | < 0.01 |
| NeS vs NeT | < 0.0002 | < 0.007 | 0.19 |
SNP association analysis in cattle population.
| Traits | Markers | P | Named allele | Effect | SE | %Va |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (kg) | 0.08 | C | − 0.57 | 0.20 | 0.32 | |
| W210 (kg) | 0.91 | C | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.00 | |
| W550 (kg) | 0.77 | C | − 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.01 | |
| H550 (cm) | 0.23 | C | − 0.46 | 0.14 | 0.10 | |
| W378 (kg) | 0.13 | C | − 0.63 | 0.12 | 0.20 | |
| H378 (cm) | 0.25 | C | − 0.38 | 0.09 | 0.39 | |
| LEA (cm2) | 0.65 | C | − 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.03 | |
| RF (mm) | 0.57 | C | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.06 | |
| BF (mm) | 0.38 | C | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.10 | |
| BW (kg) | 0.15 | A | − 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.19 | |
| W550 (kg) | 0.13 | A | − 2.86 | 2.05 | 0.21 | |
| H550 (cm) | 0.39 | A | − 0.30 | 0.18 | 0.13 | |
| W378 (kg) | 0.10 | A | − 0.26 | 0.09 | 0.24 | |
| H378 (cm) | 0.26 | A | − 0.31 | 0.13 | 0.18 | |
| LEA (cm2) | 0.14 | A | − 0.74 | 0.38 | 0.32 | |
| BF (mm) | 0.88 | A | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | |
| BW (kg) | 0.11 | A | − 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.24 | |
| W210 (kg) | 0.15 | A | − 2.03 | 1.13 | 0.95 | |
| W550 (kg) | 0.79 | A | − 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.00 | |
| H550 (cm) | 0.70 | A | − 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.01 | |
| H378 (cm) | 0.14 | A | − 0.59 | 0.09 | 0.64 | |
| LEA (cm2) | 0.56 | A | − 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.09 | |
| RF (mm) | 0.53 | A | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | |
| BF (mm) | 0.53 | A | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
The bold emphasis means the significant markers (p < 0.05).
Significance (P), allelic substitution effect (effect) for the named allele of each SNP, its standard error (SE) and the percentage of additive genetic variance (%Va) explained by the genotypes of each SNP on birth weight (BW), weaning weight adjusted to 210 days of age (W210), females yearling weight adjusted to 550 days of age (W550), female yearling hip height (H550), males yearling weight adjusted to 378 days of age (W378), male yearling hip height (H378), loin eye area (LEA), backfat thickness (BF) and rump fat thickness (RF).