| Literature DB >> 35592278 |
Min Zhang1, Yueying Guo1, Rina Su2, Mirco Corazzin3, Jiale Li1, Huan Huang1, Yue Zhang1, Duo Yao1, Lin Su1, Lihua Zhao1, Ye Jin1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of exercise training on muscle metabolism, fatty acid composition, carcass traits, and meat quality characteristics of Mongolian sheep. Fourteen Mongolian sheep were randomly divided into two groups (7 sheep in each) and placed in two adjacent livestock pens. One group of sheep was kept in the pen (Control [C] group) and the other group of sheep (Training [T] group) were driven away in a field to walk twice a day. The results showed a reduction in pH measured 45 min post mortem, L*, a*, and b* value, intramuscular fat, and carcass length, and an increase in the ultimate pH value and shear force in the meat of T group in comparison with that of C group (p < .050). Also, exercise training moderately affected the fatty acid composition of LT muscle. Compared with C group, the concentrations of myristoleic acid (C14:1) and stearic acid (C18:0) were increased (p < .050), while the concentrations of C20:3 n-6, neurolic acid (C24:1), and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) were decreased in T group (p < .050). Transcriptome analysis highlighted 621 genes differentially expressed in two groups, including 385 were up-regulated (e.g., GLUT4 and PGC-1α) and 236 were down-regulated (e.g., PLIN1 and ACSL3) in T with respect to C group. Besides, considering these genes, a number of enrichment pathways related to muscle metabolic processes, involving carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, oxidation reduction process, and muscle tissue development, were highlighted. In conclusion, these results contributed to a better understanding of the possible biological and molecular processes underlying the effects of exercise training on muscle metabolism and meat quality in Mongolian sheep, and provide useful information for contributing to understand the phenotypic and functional differences in meat quality of sheep.Entities:
Keywords: meat quality; mongolian sheep; muscle metabolism; physical exercise
Year: 2022 PMID: 35592278 PMCID: PMC9094461 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.2768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 3.553
Effects of physical exercise training on carcass characteristics of Mongolian sheep
| Items | Treatments |
| P‐values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (C) | Training (T) | |||
| Final body weight (kg) | 37.42 | 34.90 | 0.927 | 0.189 |
| Total body weight gain (kg) | 15.67 | 13.77 | 0.563 | 0.090 |
| Carcass weight (kg) | 17.76 | 17.60 | 0.451 | 0.871 |
| Carcass length (cm) | 74.75 | 72.75 | 0.526 | 0.045 |
| Thorax Depth (cm) | 18.71 | 19.00 | 0.206 | 0.510 |
| Fat thickness (mm) | 4.94 | 5.22 | 0.304 | 0.672 |
| MLT area (cm2) | 13.00 | 13.24 | 0.514 | 0.832 |
Abbreviation: SEM, standard error of the mean.
Exercise twice a day, 40 min each time, 10,000 ± 500 steps and 6000 ± 200 meters of distance were required each day.
MLT area = longissimus thoracis m. area.
Effects of physical exercise training on meat quality of the longissimus thoracis (LT) m. of Mongolian sheep
| Items | Treatments |
| P‐values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (C) | Training (T) | |||
| pH45min | 6.30 | 6.14 | 0.041 | 0.046 |
| pH24h | 5.31 | 5.56 | 0.047 | 0.003 |
| L* | 35.73 | 31.73 | 0.816 | 0.004 |
| a* | 19.82 | 18.15 | 0.385 | 0.019 |
| b* | 3.91 | 2.93 | 0.196 | 0.003 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 33.72 | 35.19 | 0.545 | 0.193 |
| Shear force ( | 43.35 | 81.66 | 6.808 | 0.001 |
| Intramuscular fat (%) | 3.41 | 2.98 | 0.089 | 0.001 |
Abbreviation: SEM, standard error of the mean.
Exercise twice a day, 40 min each time, 10,000 ± 500 steps and 6000 ± 200 meters of distance were required each day.
Correlation among meat quality of the longissimus thoracis (LT) m. of Mongolian sheep
| pH45min | pH24h | L | a | b | CL | SF | IMF | MLT area | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH45min | 1 | ||||||||
| pH24h | −0.515 | 1 | |||||||
| L | 0.037 | −0.395 | 1 | ||||||
| a | 0.219 | −0.302 | 0.875 | 1 | |||||
| b | 0.310 | −0.736 | 0.916 | 0.943 | 1 | ||||
| CL | 0.486 | −0.099 | 0.008 | 0.232 | 0.117 | 1 | |||
| SF | −0.663 | 0.748 | −0.765 | −0.580 | −0.796 | −0.412 | 1 | ||
| IMF | 0.501 | −0.782 | 0.948 | 0.891 | 0.853 | 0.742 | −0.915 | 1 | |
| MLT area | 0.395 | 0.202 | −0.497 | −0.093 | −0.055 | −0.275 | 0.229 | −0.032 | 1 |
CL = cooking loss (%).
SF: shear force (kg).
IMF: intramuscular fat (%).
MLT area = longissimus thoracis m. area (cm2).
p < .05
p < .01.
Effects of physical exercise training on fatty acid composition (g/100 g FAME) in the longissimus thoracis m. of Mongolian sheep
| Items | Treatments |
| P‐values | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (C) | Training (T) a | |||
| C10:0 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.009 | 0.284 |
| C12:0 | 0.13 | 0.12 | 0.007 | 0.502 |
| C14:0 | 1.91 | 2.27 | 0.096 | 0.058 |
| C14:1 | 0.21 | 0.39 | 0.043 | 0.035 |
| C16:0 | 22.84 | 22.20 | 0.399 | 0.449 |
| C16:1 | 2.54 | 2.41 | 0.048 | 0.201 |
| C18:0 | 12.40 | 13.58 | 0.309 | 0.049 |
| C18:1n−9 t | 1.4 | 2.16 | 0.250 | 0.156 |
| C18:1n−9 | 41.99 | 42.52 | 0.489 | 0.618 |
| C18:2n−6 t | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.038 | 0.708 |
| C18:2n−6 | 8.87 | 9.17 | 0.717 | 0.843 |
| C20:0 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.012 | 0.491 |
| C18:3n−6 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.046 | 0.305 |
| C18:3n−3 | 0.61 | 0.46 | 0.045 | 0.106 |
| C20:3n−6 | 0.44 | 0.14 | 0.051 | 0.000 |
| C20:4n−6 | 4.08 | 3.23 | 0.228 | 0.055 |
| C20:5n−3 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.024 | 0.140 |
| C24:1 | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.046 | 0.018 |
| SFA | 38.01 | 38.81 | 0.693 | 0.589 |
| MUFA | 46.83 | 46.75 | 0.674 | 0.960 |
| PUFA | 15.16 | 12.64 | 0.996 | 0.226 |
|
| 0.98 | 0.69 | 0.055 | <0.001 |
|
| 14.18 | 11.95 | 0.962 | 0.272 |
| SFA/UFA | 0.62 | 0.64 | 0.018 | 0.574 |
| PUFA/SFA | 0.37 | 0.32 | 0.028 | 0.385 |
|
| 14.43 | 16.96 | 0.755 | 0.095 |
aExercise twice a day, 40 min each time, 10,000 ± 500 steps and 6000 ± 200 meters of distance were required each day.bC18:3n‐3 + C20:5. cC18:2n6 t + C18:2n6c + C18:3n‐6 + C20:3 + C20:4.
Abbreviations: MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SEM, standard error of the mean; SFA, saturated fatty acids.
Reads mapping summary
| Sample | Raw reads | Clean reads | Total mapped | Multiple mapped | Uniquely mapped |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | 62,763,294 | 62,182,774 | 59,995,413(96.48%) | 9,325,084(15.0%) | 50,670,329(81.49%) |
| C2 | 61,950,202 | 61,468,790 | 59,173,876(96.27%) | 7,178,922(11.68%) | 51,994,954(84.59%) |
| C3 | 56,311,578 | 55,882,420 | 53,924,385(96.5%) | 8,296,167(14.85%) | 45,628,218(81.65%) |
| T1 | 59,233,396 | 58,785,936 | 56,810,365(96.64%) | 7,624,231(12.97%) | 49,186,134(83.67%) |
| T2 | 65,762,900 | 65,288,632 | 62,974,091(96.45%) | 9,296,285(14.24%) | 53,677,806(82.22%) |
| T3 | 60,054,956 | 59,642,598 | 57,451,192(96.33%) | 8,151,912(13.67%) | 49,299,280(82.66%) |
Three replicates of control group (C1, 2, and 3) and training group (T1, 2, and 3) were carried out in RNA‐seq analysis.
FIGURE 1The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in longissimus thoracis (LT) m. between the control group and the training group.
Red dots (up) represent the 385 significantly up‐regulated genes (|log2FoldChange| ≥ 1; p < .050), and green dots (down) represent the 286 significantly down‐regulated genes (|log2FoldChange| ≥ 1; p < .050) in training group. Black dots (nosig) represent insignificantly differential expressed genes
FIGURE 2The top enriched (Adj p ≤ .060) biological process terms in Gene ontology (GO) analysis of DEGs (up‐regulated) between the control and training groups
DEGs associated with metabolism and development in biological process by GO analysis
| Gene symbol | Description | Log2FC | P‐values |
Regular (C vs. T) | Enriched biological process |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGK1 | Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 | 1.2 | 1.70E−03 | up | 1,3,4,5,6,7,10 |
| TPI1 | Triosephosphate isomerase 1 | 1.1 | 2.09E−03 | up | 1,4,5 |
| GK | Glycerol kinase, transcript variant X1 | 1.2 | 7.41E−03 | up | 1 |
| PLIN1 | Perilipin 1 | −1.1 | 1.15E−02 | down | 2 |
| DGAT2 | Diacylglycerol O‐acyltransferase 2 | 1.3 | 2.69E−02 | up | 1,2,6,9 |
| ACSL3 | Acyl‐CoA synthetase long chain family member 3 | −1.0 | 2.98E−03 | down | 10 |
| ACSF3 | Acyl‐CoA synthetase family member 3, transcript variant X1 | 1.0 | 4.87E−03 | up | 2,4,5 |
| PGC−1α | PPARG coactivator 1 alpha, transcript variant X1 | 1.3 | 8.98E−03 | up | 3,6,7,8,10 |
| GLUT4 | Solute carrier family 2 member 4 | 1.2 | 1.74E−03 | up | 6,7 |
| SOCS3 | Suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 | 2.3 | 4.77E−02 | up | 2,6,7,8,10 |
| GOT1 | Glutamic‐oxaloacetic transaminase 1 | 1.3 | 1.69E−06 | up | 1,5 |
| GSTA1 | Glutathione S‐transferase alpha 1 | −1.7 | 1.00E−07 | down | 2,4,5,10 |
| GADL1 | Glutamate decarboxylase like 1 | 2.2 | 4.70E−06 | up | 5 |
| CYP1A1 | Cytochrome P4501A1, transcript variant X1 | 1.9 | 2.49E−04 | up | 2,4,5 |
| SDS | Serine dehydratase | 1.4 | 1.31E−02 | up | 1,4,5 |
| SYNJ2 | Synaptojanin 2 | 2.2 | 8.84E−07 | up | 2 |
| AKR1B1 | Aldo‐keto reductase family 1 member B | 1.2 | 1.69E−03 | up | 2 |
| HK2 | Hexokinase 2 | 1.5 | 4.14E−05 | up | 1,4,5 |
| DHDH | Dihydrodiol dehydrogenase | 1.1 | 2.13E−04 | up | 1 |
| PKM | Pyruvate kinase M1/2, transcript variant X2 | 1.4 | 3.78E−04 | up | 1,4,5 |
| AFG1L | AFG1 like ATPase | 1.1 | 2.89E−02 | up | 3 |
| MRPS36 | Mitochondrial ribosomal protein S36 | 1.1 | 5.53E−04 | up | 3,5 |
| CYP2D6 | Cytochrome P450 2D6 | 1.7 | 9.71E−05 | up | 2,3,4,5,10 |
| LDLR | Low‐density lipoprotein receptor | 1.0 | 1.26E−02 | up | 2,6 |
| GPCPD1 | Glycerophosphocholine phosphodiesterase 1, transcript variant X1 | 1.0 | 2.15E−04 | up | 2,6 |
| FGFR3 | Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3, transcript variant X2 | −2.1 | 1.18E−04 | down | 6,7,8,10 |
| GDF11 | Growth differentiation factor 11 | 1.1 | 4.99E−02 | up | 6,8,10 |
| ND2 | NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 | −1.0 | 1.40E−02 | down | 3 |
| Wnt11 | Wnt family member 11 | 1.3 | 2.06E−03 | up | 6,7 |
| CAMK2A | Calcium/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II alpha, transcript variant X1 | 1.1 | 1.54E−02 | up | 6,8 |
Enriched biological process: 1. carbohydrate metabolic process; 2. lipid metabolic process; 3. Oxidation reduction process; 4. monocarboxylic acid metabolic process; 5. organic acid metabolic process; 6. developmental process; 7. cell differentiation; 8. regulation of cell death; 9. fatty acid derivative metabolic process; and 10. regulation of phosphate metabolic process.
FIGURE 3KEGG Pathway analysis of DEGs between the control group and the training group.
(a)The significant enriched (p ___ 0.050) KEGG pathways for up‐regulated DEGs.
(b)The significant enriched (p___ 0.050) KEGG pathways for down‐regulated DEGs
FIGURE 4DEGs enriched in KEGG pathways related to the metabolic process.
The genes are linked to their assigned terms via colored ribbons. Chords represent a detailed relationship between the expression levels of up‐regulated DEGs (left semicircle perimeter) and their enriched KEGG pathways (right semicircle perimeter)
FIGURE 5Validation of twelve differentially expressed genes by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT‐PCR).
18S was used as an internal control, and data are presented as log2 Fold Change (n = 3 per group)