Literature DB >> 25852780

Bifurcation dynamics and determination of alternate cell fates in bipotent progenitor cells.

Shanshan Li1, Yanwei Liu1, Zengrong Liu1, Ruiqi Wang1.   

Abstract

The gene regulatory networks in which two lineage-affiliated transcription factors, such as GATA1 and PU.1, inhibit each other but activate themselves so as to regulate the choice between alternative cell fates have been extensively studied. These simple networks can generate bistability and explain the transitions between the alternative cell fates. The commitment of a progenitor cell to a new fate corresponds to the occurrence of different types of bifurcations, depending on if a system is symmetrical and how perturbations affect the system. Here we take a general modeling and analyzing approach and show that the lateral inhibition with symmetry and asymmetry can lead to different bifurcation dynamics. Especially, if cell fate decision-making is initiated with asymmetry or symmetry-breaking perturbations, a progenitor cell pre-patterns itself into a polarized cell, depending on the asymmetry or symmetry-breaking perturbations. This study may help us understand the fundamental features of binary cell fate decisions more clearly and further apply to a wider range of decision-making processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asymmetry; Bifurcation; Bistability; Cell fate decisions; Lateral inhibition; Symmetry

Year:  2015        PMID: 25852780      PMCID: PMC4378578          DOI: 10.1007/s11571-014-9318-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn        ISSN: 1871-4080            Impact factor:   5.082


  19 in total

1.  GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription.

Authors:  C Nerlov; E Querfurth; H Kulessa; T Graf
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  Hematopoietic stem cell: self-renewal versus differentiation.

Authors:  Jun Seita; Irving L Weissman
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

3.  Genetic toggle switch without cooperative binding.

Authors:  Azi Lipshtat; Adiel Loinger; Nathalie Q Balaban; Ofer Biham
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 9.161

Review 4.  Epigenetics: a landscape takes shape.

Authors:  Aaron D Goldberg; C David Allis; Emily Bernstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Myeloid lineage commitment from the hematopoietic stem cell.

Authors:  Hiromi Iwasaki; Koichi Akashi
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness.

Authors:  Sui Huang
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1.

Authors:  P Zhang; G Behre; J Pan; A Iwama; N Wara-Aswapati; H S Radomska; P E Auron; D G Tenen; Z Sun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences.

Authors:  Arjun Raj; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  FOG-1 and GATA-1 act sequentially to specify definitive megakaryocytic and erythroid progenitors.

Authors:  Elena Mancini; Alejandra Sanjuan-Pla; Luisa Luciani; Susan Moore; Amit Grover; Agnes Zay; Kasper D Rasmussen; Sidinh Luc; Daniel Bilbao; Donal O'Carroll; Sten Eirik Jacobsen; Claus Nerlov
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Multistable decision switches for flexible control of epigenetic differentiation.

Authors:  Raúl Guantes; Juan F Poyatos
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.