| Literature DB >> 25851097 |
Björn Hoppe1, Krüger Krger2, Tiemo Kahl3, Tobias Arnstadt4, François Buscot5, Jürgen Bauhus3, Tesfaye Wubet5.
Abstract
Deadwood is an important biodiversity hotspot in forest ecosystems. While saproxylic insects and wood-inhabiting fungiEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25851097 PMCID: PMC4389208 DOI: 10.1038/srep09456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Relative abundances of phylogenetic groups (bacterial phyla including proteobacterial classes) in deadwood from two species (Fagus sylvatica = FASY, Picea abies = PIAB) in different stages of decay (decay classes 1–4).
OTUs that could not be taxonomically assigned at the phylum/subphylum level are reported as “Others” and comprise ≤ 0.006% of all sequences. The category “other” also includes all OTUs with <1.5% relative sequence abundance.
Figure 2Relative abundances of the three dominant phylogenetic groups (bacterial orders) in deadwood of the two studied tree species (Fagus sylvatica = FASY, Picea abies = PIAB) in different stages of decay (decay classes 1–4).
Differences between decay classes and tree species were analyzed by employing one-way analysis of variance and Fisher's Least Significant Difference (LSD) post hoc test (ns = not significant, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001).
Results of perMANOVA analysis of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities for bacterial OTU community structure in relation to tree species, decay class (assigned based on the remaining mass of the log in question), management regime, and their interaction, Df = degrees of freedom; SS = sum of squares; MS = mean sum of squares; Pseudo-F = F value by permutation. Bold face indicates statistical significance (P < 0.05); P-values are based on 9999 permutations (i.e. the lowest possible P-value is 0.0001)
| Df | SS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tree species | 1 | 0.8052 | 5.6484 | 0.09982 | |
| Decay class | 1 | 0.6076 | 4.2622 | 0.07532 | |
| Management type | 2 | 0.3967 | 1.3914 | 0.04918 | 0.0527 |
| Tree species x Decay class | 1 | 0.2377 | 1.6674 | 0.02947 | |
| Tree species x Management type | 2 | 0.4011 | 1.4068 | 0.04972 | |
| Decay class x Management type | 2 | 0.3474 | 1.2186 | 0.04307 | 0.1492 |
| Tree species x Decay class x Management type | 2 | 0.2815 | 0.9872 | 0.03489 | 0.4543 |
| Residuals | 35 | 4.9895 | 0.61853 | ||
| Total | 46 | 8.0667 | 1 |
Figure 3Two-dimensional non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plots of bacterial community structure across the different tree species at each stage of decay (FASY1-4, PIAB1–4).
Plots show centroids within a single decay stage, bars represent one SD along both NMDS axes. Statistical significances (R and P-values) are based on Goodness-of-fit statistics for environmental variables and bacterial order abundances per sample.
Goodness-of-fit statistics (R2) for parameters fitted to the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of bacterial community structure. The significance estimates were based on 999 permutations. Significant factors (Bonferroni corrected P < 0.05) are indicated in bold. Marginally significant variables (Bonferroni corrected P < 0.10) are indicated in italics. Data on remaining mass%, density, corrected N, and C content are auto-correlated (compare Table S2)
| decay class | 0.5257 | 0.6087 | 0.5205 | |||
| remaining mass% | 0.6449 | 0.7669 | 0.5999 | |||
| volume (m3) | 0.1519 | 0.3149 | 0.0806 | 0.308 | ||
| wood density (g/cm3) | 0.7144 | 0.7536 | 0.6133 | |||
| rel. wood moisture% | 0.2959 | 0.4438 | 0.3654 | |||
| C% | 0.3011 | 0.2357 | 0.1944 | 0.126 | ||
| N% | 0.1352 | 0.1989 | 0.103 | 0.204 | 0.112 | |
| C/N | 0.1932 | 0.1917 | 0.109 | 0.2071 | ||
| C (g/cm3) | 0.7175 | 0.7569 | 0.6174 | |||
| N (g/cm3) | 0.4622 | 0.3728 | 0.1601 | 0.163 | ||
| pH | 0.493 | 0.3439 | 0.1438 | 0.197 | ||