Literature DB >> 25849488

Deep sequencing of the Trypanosoma cruzi GP63 surface proteases reveals diversity and diversifying selection among chronic and congenital Chagas disease patients.

Martin S Llewellyn1, Louisa A Messenger2, Alejandro O Luquetti3, Lineth Garcia4, Faustino Torrico4, Suelene B N Tavares3, Bachar Cheaib5, Nicolas Derome5, Marc Delepine6, Céline Baulard6, Jean-Francois Deleuze6, Sascha Sauer7, Michael A Miles2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease results from infection with the diploid protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. T. cruzi is highly genetically diverse, and multiclonal infections in individual hosts are common, but little studied. In this study, we explore T. cruzi infection multiclonality in the context of age, sex and clinical profile among a cohort of chronic patients, as well as paired congenital cases from Cochabamba, Bolivia and Goias, Brazil using amplicon deep sequencing technology. METHODOLOGY/ PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A 450bp fragment of the trypomastigote TcGP63I surface protease gene was amplified and sequenced across 70 chronic and 22 congenital cases on the Illumina MiSeq platform. In addition, a second, mitochondrial target--ND5--was sequenced across the same cohort of cases. Several million reads were generated, and sequencing read depths were normalized within patient cohorts (Goias chronic, n = 43, Goias congenital n = 2, Bolivia chronic, n = 27; Bolivia congenital, n = 20), Among chronic cases, analyses of variance indicated no clear correlation between intra-host sequence diversity and age, sex or symptoms, while principal coordinate analyses showed no clustering by symptoms between patients. Between congenital pairs, we found evidence for the transmission of multiple sequence types from mother to infant, as well as widespread instances of novel genotypes in infants. Finally, non-synonymous to synonymous (dn:ds) nucleotide substitution ratios among sequences of TcGP63Ia and TcGP63Ib subfamilies within each cohort provided powerful evidence of strong diversifying selection at this locus.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results shed light on the diversity of parasite DTUs within each patient, as well as the extent to which parasite strains pass between mother and foetus in congenital cases. Although we were unable to find any evidence that parasite diversity accumulates with age in our study cohorts, putative diversifying selection within members of the TcGP63I gene family suggests a link between genetic diversity within this gene family and survival in the mammalian host.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25849488      PMCID: PMC4388557          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis        ISSN: 1935-2727


Introduction

Trypanosoma cruzi is a kinetoplastid parasite and the causative agent of Chagas disease (CD) in Latin America. T. cruzi infects approximately 8 million people throughout its distribution and causes some 13,000 deaths annually [1]. Chagas disease follows a complex course. Infection, often acquired in childhood, is generally lifelong but progression from the indetermined (asymptomatic) to symptomatic stage occurs in only 30% of cases [2]. A broad pathological spectrum is associated with clinical CD including potentially fatal cardiological and gastrointestinal abnormalities [3]. The relative contributions of parasite and host immunity in driving disease pathology are a matter of continuing debate [4]. Recently, for example, bioluminescent parasite infections in BALB/c mouse models have suggested that heart disease can progress in the absence of detectable local parasite load [5]. It is widely recognized that natural parasitic infections are often comprised of several parasite clones [6]. Malariologists use the term ‘multiplicity of infection’ (MOI) to describe when multiple Plasmodium sp. genotypes occur within the same host [7,8]. A similar phenomenon has been observed in T. cruzi in vectors (e.g. [9]), as well as mammalian reservoir hosts (e.g [10]) and humans hosts (e.g. [11]) using solid phase plating and cell sorting techniques. The occurrence of multi-genotype infections has fundamental implications for host immunity [12], as well as for accurate evaluation of pathogen drug resistance [13], transmission rate, epidemiology and population structure (e.g. [7,11]). The efficiency with which it is possible to sample pathogen clonal diversity from biological samples has soared in recent years with the advent of next generation sequencing. Deep sequencing approaches have long been applied to study the dynamics of HIV anti-viral therapy escape mutations. As a result amplicon sequencing increasingly features in a clinical diagnostic context [14]. Plasmodium falciparum MOI can be resolved at merozoite surface protein loci at far greater depths than possible by standard PCR approaches [15]. Furthermore, targeting low copy number antigens in parasite populations via amplicon sequencing can provide important clues to frequency-dependent selection pressures within hosts, between hosts and between host populations [16]. T. cruzi can persist for several decades within an individual host. Unsurprisingly perhaps, therefore, T. cruzi shows significant antigenic complexity. T. cruzi surface proteins are encoded by several large, repetitive gene families that are distributed throughout the parasite genome [17]. Among these gene families the mucins, transialidases, ‘dispersed gene families’ (DGFs), mucin-associated surface proteins (MASPs) and GP63 surface proteases comprise the vast majority of sequences—10–15% of the total genome size [17,18]. Whilst the role of some of the proteins encoded by surface gene families in host cell recognition and invasion is relatively well understood (e.g. the transialidases [19]), the role of others (e.g. the MASPs, DGFs) is not. Furthermore, the role each plays in evading an effective host response remains largely unknown. The GP63 surface proteases are found in a wide variety of organisms, including parasitic trypanosomatids [20]. In Leishmania spp. GP63 proteases are the most common component of the parasite cell surface with crucial roles in pathogenicity, innate immune evasion, interaction with the host extracellular matrix and ensuring effective phagocytosis by macrophages [21]. In T. brucei subspp. the role of GP63 proteins is less well defined, although some protein classes are thought to be involved with variant surface glycoprotein processing between different life cycle stages [22]. In T. cruzi at least four classes of GP63 gene are recognized [20]. Like many GP63 proteases in Leishmania spp., surface expressed T. cruzi GP63 (TcGP63) genes are anchored to the cell membrane via glycosyl phosphatidylinositol moieties [23,24]. Among these are the TcGP63 Ia & Ib genes (collectively TcGP63I). TcGP63 Ia & Ib encode 78kDa 543 amino acid proteins, are expressed in all life cycle stages and are implicated in the successful invasion of mammalian cells in vitro [23,24]. In the current study we target TcGP63I genes as markers of antigenic diversity among three cohorts of Chagas disease patients: two in Cochabamba, Bolivia and one in Goias, Brazil. We also targeted a maxicircle gene for the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 to provide basic T. cruzi genotypic information for each case. Diversity at each of the two T. cruzi loci within each patient was characterized using a deep amplicon sequencing approach, generating several million sequence reads. Our results shed light on the diversity of parasite DTUs within each patient, as well as the extent to which parasite strains pass between mother and foetus in congenital cases. We were unable to find any evidence that parasite diversity accumulates with age in our study cohorts, or to detect a link between parasite diversity and clinical profile. However, we were able to detect evidence of putative diversifying selection within members of the TcGP63 gene family, suggesting a link between genetic diversity within this gene family and survival in the mammalian host.

Materials and Methods

Ethical statement

Ethical permissions were in place at the two centres where human sample collections were made, as well as at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM). Local ethical approval for the project was given at the Plataforma de Chagas, Facultad de Medicina, UMSS, Cochabamba, Bolivia by the Comite de Bioetica, Facultad de Medcina, UMSS. Local ethical permission for the project was given at the Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goias (UFG), Goias, Brazil by the Comite de Etica em Pesquisa Médica Humana e Animal, protocol number 5659. Ethical approval for sample collection at the LSHTM was given for the overall study, “Comparative epidemiology of genetic lineages of Trypanosoma cruzi” protocol number 5483. Samples were collected with written informed consent from the patient and/or their legal guardian.

Biological sample collection

Parasite isolation protocols were different between centres. At the UMSS, 0.5 mL of whole venous blood was taken from chronic patients and inoculated directly into biphasic blood agar culture. T. cruzi positive samples were minimally repassaged and cryopreserved at log phase (precise repassage history unavailable). For infants, 0.5 mL of chord blood was taken at birth and inoculated into culture. Again, positive samples were cryopreserved at log phase after minimal repassage (precise repassage history unavailable). DNA extractions, using a Roche High-Pure Template Kit, were made directly from the cryopreserved stabilate. At the UFG, 17 mL of whole blood was collected into EDTA, centrifuged for 10 minutes at 1200g at 4°C and the plasma replaced with 8mL Liver Infusion Tryptone (LIT) medium. After a further 10 minutes at 1200g (4°C), the supernatant was again removed. Two mL of packed red blood cells were subsequently transferred to 3 mL of LIT medium and checked periodically for signs of epimastigote growth by light microscopy. Positive cultures were not repassaged. Instead primary cultures were stabilized by the addition of guanidine 6 M-EDTA 0.2 M (Sigma-Aldrich, UK). DNA extractions were made from the full volume using the QIAamp DNA Blood Maxi Kit (Qiagen, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Among Bolivian strains, DNA concentrations submitted to PCR were standardized after quantitation using a PicoGreen assay. In view of presence of human genetic material in Goias samples, parasite DNA concentrations were standardized to within the same order of magnitude via qPCR as previously described [25]. All samples collected for in this study are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Samples provenance and symptoms.

TcGp63I Shannon Index
CodeSexAgeProvinceCountrySymptomsND5 Sequence Type97% ST99% ST
PCC 313 F33Pampa San Miguel, CochabambaBoliviaCardiopathyTcIII-VI0.8638332.104583
PCC 221 F52Cercado, CochabambaBoliviaCardiopathyTcIII-VI0.9112792.757206
PCC 310 F58Collaj chullpaBoliviaCardiopathyTcIII-VI0.800382.267772
PCC 302 F55Oropeza, ChuquisacaBoliviaCardiopathyTcIII-VINDND
PCC 277 F50Pucara Grande, CochabambaBoliviaCardiopathyTcIII-VI0.6802761.896947
PCC 460 M43Quillacollo, CochabambaBoliviaCardiopathyTcIII-VI0.644931.609727
PCC 240 F36Pucara grande, CochabambaBoliviaCardiopathyTcI0.197570.970659
PCC 243 F19Chilimarca, CochabambaBoliviaCardiopathyTcIII-VI0.8636572.235602
PCC 262 F36Ticti Norte, CochabambaBoliviaCardiopathyTcIII-VI0.6023612.407113
PCC 096 F58Cercado-CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VINDND
PCC 295 F45Sacaba, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.822362.641406
PCC 151 F24Cerro verde, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.8091112.424673
PCC 253 M46Campero, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.7659552.147924
PCC 210 F40Cercado, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.792582.335818
PCC 263 M50Calicanto, Santa CruzBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.6543151.948427
PCC 451 F32Uspa Uspa, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.7157352.016351
PCC 480 F46Cercado, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.7354191.883752
PCC 481 F26Huayra kasaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI1.126953.229099
PCC 149 F20Cercado, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.8494942.875091
PCC 502 F44Alto Quer-Queru, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.8138332.570795
PCC 456 M27Scaba, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.5294131.677289
PCC 489 M46Quillacollo, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.9350672.67856
PCC 499 F41Sacaba, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.8785782.402874
PCC 289 F24Sacaba, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcI1.0811ND
PCC 226 F22Santivañez, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VIND2.364685
PCC 255 F49Quillacollo, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.7035731.966296
PCC 251 F37Sacaba, CochabambaBoliviaAsymptomaticTcIII-VI0.7745342.312599
6339 F58Sao Luiz MBelos, GoiasBrazilCardiopathyTcII0.3732051.409882
6340 F76Serra do Salitre, Minas GeraisBrazilMegaesophagusTcII0.190351.879923
6345 F67Formosa, GoiasBrazilMegacolon, MegaesophagusTcII/TcI0.3038811.574604
6349 F37Wanderlei, BahiaBrazilMegaesophagusTcII/TcIII-VI0.8411021.801845
6356 M65Itapaci, GoiasBrazilCardiopathy, Megacolon, MegaesophagusTcII1.1680832.787444
6360 F40MaraRosa, GoiasBrazilCardiopathyTcII/TcIII-VI0.284872.332717
6372 M38Correntina, BahiaBrazilMegaesophagusTcII0.1983271.72982
6373 F54Rubiataba, GoiasBrazilMegaesophagusTcII0.4576921.929769
6378 F39Itapaci, GoiasBrazilMegacolon, megaesophagusTcII0.3575081.259254
6379 z M39Sao Luiz MBelos, GoiasBrazilAsymptomaticTcII/TcIII-VINDND
6380 F59Brazabrantes, GoiasBrazilAsymptomaticTcII0.7420251.786299
6382 M56Jussara, GoiasBrazilMegaesophagusTcII0.3328972.104033
6383 M30Angical, BahiaBrazilAsymptomaticTcII0.5617491.653877
6385 F31SantaMariaVitoria, BahiaBrazilAsymptomaticTcII0.3048541.87694
6386 M33Correntina, BahiaBrazilCardiopathyTcII/TcIII-VI0.2221461.393783
6387 F57Lagolandia, GoiasBrazilCardiopathy (nontypical), MegaoesophagosTcII0.074581.601748
6389 F24Cocos, BahiaBrazilAsymptomaticND0.0251771.835489
6390 M32Cocos, BahiaBrazilCardiopathyND0.0374991.722559
6400 F47Correntina, BahiaBrazilAsymptomaticTcII/TcI0.6253961.664578
6401 y M30SantaMariaVitoria, BahiaBrazilMegaesophagusTcII0.734481.570591
6403 F47Correntina, BahiaBrazilCardiopathy (nontypical) MegaesophagusTcII/TcI0.3097241.136665
6407 F52Jussara, GoiasBrazilCardiopathy (nontypical)TcII0.1648411.86004
6416 x M45Ceres, GoiasBrazilSevere cardiopathyTcII/TcI0.3208452.110287
6423 M63Varzeas, BahiaBrazilMegaesophagusTcII/TcI0.3089322.268015
6425 M71JoaoPinheiro,Minas GeraisBrazilCardiopathy, megaesophagusND0.6235221.895166
6445 z M40Sao Luiz MBelos, GoiasBrazilCardiopathy (nontypical)TcII0.7339161.707039
6452 x M46Ceres, GoiasBrazilSevere cardiopathyTcII/TcI0.2252771.316351
6453 M72JoaoPinheiro,Minas GeraisBrazilMegaesophagusTcII0.8411321.880447
6536 y M30SantaMariaVitoria, BahiaBrazilMegaesophagusTcII/TcI0.5156962.510533
6548 F57Guiratinga, Mato GrossoBrazilAsymptomaticTcIINDND
6561 F46Correntina, BahiaBrazilAsymptomaticND0.8683311.82152
6563 F58Sao Domingos, GoiasBrazilCardiopathy (non-typical)TcII1.0492232.262427
6569 M65Anapolis, GoiasBrazilMegaesophagusTcII/TcIII-VI0.6155551.578375
6571 F69Uruana, GoiasBrazilCardiopathy, megaesophagusND0.3660732.659534
6574 F39SantaMaria da Vitoria, BahiaBrazilMegaesophagusND0.8469751.682228
6577 F63Damolandia, GoiasBrazilCardiopathy, Megacolon, MegaesophagusND0.2584611.892257
6581 M55Rubiataba, GoiasBrazilCardiopathyTcII0.8200422.019464
6582 M45MorroChapeu, BahiaBrazilCardiopathy, megacolon, megaesophagusTcII/TcIII-VI1.0797221.940343
6588 M51Luziania, GoiasBrazilCardiopathyTcII0.1978560.719487
6590 M49Itaberai, GoiasBrazilSevere cardiopathyTcII/TcIII-VI0.324462.4802
6597 F56Almas, TOBrazilMegaesophagus, megacolonTcII/TcI0.6406731.910199
6603 F36SantaMariaVitoria, BahiaBrazilCardiopathyTcII0.4032891.987725
6687 F49Arapua, Minas GeraisBrazilCardiopathy, megaesophagusTcII/TcI0.3904821.752364
6718 a F28Sao Luiz MBelos, GoiasBrazilCardiopathyTcII/TcI0.2819181.826416
6720 a F1Sao Luiz MBelos, GoiasBrazilAcute phaseTcII/TcI0.2241371.67497
CIUF 45 (B1) ND<1CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.679934
CIUF 63 (M1) F18CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.582106
CIUF 91 (B10) ND<1CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.948954
CIUF 84 (M10) F35CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND2.247228
CIUF24 (B2) ND<1Alto CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.390874
CIUF31 (M2) F20Alto CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.662247
CIUF40 (B3) ND<1SucreBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.621565
CIUF25 (M3) F19SucreBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.231294
CIUF 42 (B4) ND<1CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.886761
CIUF26 (M4) F21CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.914621
CIUF65 (B5) ND<1CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VI/TcIND1.578691
CIUF75 (M5) F17CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VI/TcIND1.576942
CIUF 105 (B6) ND<1Quillacollo, CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND2.330751
CIUF 104 (M6) F17Quillacollo, CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND2.082838
CIUF 53 (B7) ND<1SucreBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.6921
CIUF 76 (M7) F27SucreBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND2.683029
CIUF 35 (B8) ND<1Chimba, CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.992589
CIUF 93 (M8) FNDChimba, CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.653714
CIUF 98 (B9) ND<1Vinto, CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.983814
CIUF 109 (M9) F18Vinto, CochabambaBoliviaCongenitalTcIII-VIND1.716494

a Samples from Goias congenital case

x Samples from the same patient taken >12 months apart

y Samples from the same patient taken < 6 months apart

z Samples taken from the same patient >12 months apart

a Samples from Goias congenital case x Samples from the same patient taken >12 months apart y Samples from the same patient taken < 6 months apart z Samples taken from the same patient >12 months apart

Epidemiological and clinical observations

The two areas studied have dissimilar histories in terms of Chagas disease transmission intensity. Vector-borne T. cruzi transmission in Goias and its surrounding states (where samples were collected—Table 1) was interrupted approximately 20 years before the sampling detailed in this study [26,27]. In the sub-Andean semi-arid valleys of Cochabamba and its environs, however, vector-borne domestic transmission is still a likely source of new infections, albeit at a reduced rate since intensive spraying campaigns in the mid 2000s [28]. Clinical data collected in this study were categorised simply into symptomatic and asymptomatic classes for statistical tests in view of samples sizes. Sub-categories within symptoms were defined as 1) Cardiopathy (including any electrocardiographic and/ or echocardiographic abnormalities, X-ray with cardiac enlargement. Patients with atypical cardiac abnormalities i.e. those not exclusively associated with Chagas disease, were included in the symptomatic class in the context of this study.) 2) Megaesophagous (including achalasia and barium swallow abnormalities) 3) Megacolon (constipation associated with dilation as by barium enema) and 4) Normal (no symptoms or signs on examination and a normal electrocardiogram) (Table 1)

Primer design, PCR conditions, amplicon sequencing and controls

Degenerate primers for a 450bp fragment of the maxi-circle NADH dehydrogenase 5 were designed as described in Messenger et al. 2012 [29]. Degenerate primer design for the TcGP63I family surface proteases (including Ia and Ib sublaclasses) [24] was achieved by reference to sequences retrieved from EuPathDB for Esmeraldo (TcII), CL Brener (TcVI), Silvio (TcI) and JR (TcI) (http://eupathdb.org/). Primer biding site positions in relation to TcGP63I putative functional domains are displayed in S1 Fig. Homologs were identified by BLAST similarity to a complete TcGP63I sequence (bit score (S) ≥ 1000). Alignments of resulting sequences were made in MUSCLE [30] and primers were designed manually to target a variable region within and between individual strains with a final size of 450bp. ND5b primer sequences were ND5b_F ARAGTACACAGTTTGGRYTRCAYA; ND5b_R CTTGCYAARATACAACCACAA. The final TcGP63 primers were TcGP63_F RGAACCGATGTCATGGGGCAA and TcGP63_R CCAGYTGGTGTAATRCTGCYGCC. Amplification was undertaken using the Fluidigm platform and a reduction of the manufacturer’s recommended number of cycles to total of 26 was made in an attempt to minimise PCR amplification bias. Thus, the manufacturer’s recommended conditions were adapted to the following protocol: one cycle of 50°C for 2 minutes, 70°C for 20 minutes, and 95°C for 10 minutes; six cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 60 seconds; two cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 80°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 60s; five cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 60 seconds; two cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 80°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 60 seconds; five cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds, 72°C for 60 seconds, and finally five cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 80°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 30 seconds and 72°C for 60 seconds. Amplifications were performed using the FastStart High Fidelity PCR System (Roche). Three PCR reactions were pooled per sample prior to sequencing in an attempt to further reduce amplification biases [31]. Equimolar concentrations of ND5 and TcGP63I amplicons from 96 DNA samples were multiplexed on Illumina runs using dual index sequence tags (Illumina Inc). Sequencing was undertaken using a MiSeq platform using a 2 x 250 bp (Reagent Kit version 2) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In addition to the clinical samples, we included a dilution series of control samples. The controls comprised artificially mixes of DTUs I-VI genomic DNA at equimolar concentrations. At the ND5 locus, comparison between the expected DTU abundance ratios and diversity of artificial control mixes and that defined via amplicon sequencing was made (S2 Fig.).

Amplicon sequence data analysis

De-multiplexed paired-end sequences were submitted to quality control and trimming in Sickle [32] and mate pairs trimmed in FASTX Toolkit (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/). ND5, TcGP63 and contaminating sequences were then sorted against a reference using BOWTIE2 [33]. Individual paired reads were found to be overlapping in only a minority of cases. Thus we chose to proceed with analysis of a sequence fragment with a truncated central section for both targets. Further sequence manipulations were undertaken using FASTX Toolkit and custom awk scripts to parse files and concatenate each mate pair into a single sequence for downstream analysis. MUSCLE [30] was used for alignment of amplicon sequences in each patient sample. Next, analysis was undertaken in the Mothur software package [34] for the elimination of putative PCR chimeras and individual sequence clustering. The Shannon index of diversity was calculated at the intra-patient level based on sequence types (STs) defined at 97% and 99% identity in Mothur [34]. Comparisons of Shannon diversity were made between patients in each cohort (Bolivia chronic, Bolivia congenital, Goias chronic) via analyses of covariance and linear regression in the R package (http://CRAN.R-project.org). TcGP63I sequence datasets for patients from each cohort were then merged and analyses conducted using 97% and 99% STs defined with UPARSE [35] across patients. Weighted UniFrac distances between TcGP63I STs among samples were generated and subsequently clustered via a principal coordinates analysis in QIIME [36]. Significance of association between UniFrac clustering, disease status and age was tested in the vegan package in R [37]. Estimates of diversifying selection among TcGP63I STs were made in KaKs Calculator [38] using Yang and Neilson’s 2000 approximate method [39] and tested for significance using a Fisher’s exact test. Prior to selection calculations, sequences were clustered into 99% identity STs and singletons excluded in an attempt to exclude SNPs introduced as PCR artefacts. To test for diversifying selection across putative TcGP63I gene families (TcGP63Ia & Ib—97% cut-off as defined by Cuevas and colleagues [24]), 99% identity STs from each patient cohort were pooled (Table 2). To test for selection within TcGP63I gene families, STs within each 97% category (corresponding to TcGP63Ia & b respectively) were examined separately per cohort (Table 2). Amplicon sequences analysed in this study are available in the data appendix in supplementary information (S1 Appendix).
Table 2

Yang and Neilson estimates for positive selection within and among abundant 97% STs identified in this study.

Population / STInfecting strainSequences in cluster a MethodKaKsKa/KsP-Value b S-SitesN-SitesSubstitutionsS-SubstitutionsN-Substitutions
Goias TcII357227 (271)YN 0.06 0.07 0.8354 0.0000 1491037539.03061974.02087.0
Goias ST1 TcII236805 (149)YN 7.45 2.82 2.6436 0.0000 6628.4620575.5200944528.315565.7
Goias ST2 TcII96274 (82)YN 7.04 1.11 6.3415 0.0000 4112.2812000.7117132328.39384.7
Goias ST4 TcII9981 (19)YN0.020.050.41510.0000978.5512543.510248.453.6
Bolivia TcV/TcI59431 (86)YN0.060.080.7515 0.0002 4333.8110471.2904314.8589.2
Bolivia ST1 TcV38455 (36)YN0.020.030.78760.16002092.155077.918262.0120.0
Bolivia ST2 TcV12676 (24)YN0.030.030.78680.22901208.923471.113441.093.0
Bolivia ST3 TcI3448 (13)YN 5.57 1.98 2.8059 0.0000 582.9811679.01739402.51336.5
Bolivia ST4 TcI242 (3)YN4.483.611.24220.3484138.391392.6410102.9307.1

a Numbers in brackets represent the number of 99% STs define within each cluster from which estimates were generated.

b P values are give for Fisher’s exact tests for deviation from the neutral expectation of Ka/Ks = 0.

a Numbers in brackets represent the number of 99% STs define within each cluster from which estimates were generated. b P values are give for Fisher’s exact tests for deviation from the neutral expectation of Ka/Ks = 0.

Results

Sequence yields and discrete typing unit (DTU) designations

After quality filtering, trimming, decontamination and removal of unpaired reads, 6,736,749 reads were assigned to the ND5 mitochondrial marker and 871,855 to TcGP63I marker across the 92 clinical samples, perhaps reflecting higher copy number in the former than the latter. After trimming, the overlap between individual mate pairs was marginally too short to be assembled into a single read. Thus paired reads were first aligned against a full-length reference fragment and the central portion excised to remove any gaps and ensure correct alignment. Sequence depth thresholds per sample for inclusion were set for each dataset (Goias—ND5 & TcGP63–10,000; Cochabamba—ND5: 30,000; TcGP63 10,000; see Fig. 1). Reads from samples in excess of this threshold were discarded and samples with read counts below this threshold excluded. Our aim in setting the threshold was: 1) To include as many samples as possible while maintaining a good depth of coverage; 2) To standardise sampling intensity across individuals and thus facilitate comparisons between them.
Fig 1

Read depths by sample and locus for Goias and Cochabamba chronic patient cohorts after quality filtering.

Read depths generated on the Illumina MiSeq platform were standardized across samples prior to analysis. Inclusion thresholds for TcGP63 (Goias—10,000; Cochabamba—3000; wide dash line; red bars) and ND5 (Goais—10,000; Cochabamba—30,000; thin dash line; blue bars) are shown for each population.

Read depths by sample and locus for Goias and Cochabamba chronic patient cohorts after quality filtering.

Read depths generated on the Illumina MiSeq platform were standardized across samples prior to analysis. Inclusion thresholds for TcGP63 (Goias—10,000; Cochabamba—3000; wide dash line; red bars) and ND5 (Goais—10,000; Cochabamba—30,000; thin dash line; blue bars) are shown for each population. The ND5 mitochondrial target was sequenced to provide DTU I-VI identification of parasites circulating within and among patients by comparison to existing data [29]. However, with reference to the results from the control samples—and due the necessary truncation of the sequence fragment—only three groups could be reliably distinguished, corresponding to the three major T. cruzi maxicircle sequence classes [40]. The three groups corresponded to TcI, TcII and TcIII-VI respectively. Furthermore, in reference to the control mixes, we found evidence that amplification bias dramatically skewed the recovery of sequence types (STs) towards the TcIII-VI group. Some skew is expected, as these four DTUs (TcIII-VI) share the same maxicircle sequence class, and this class is thus more abundant in the control mix. However, TcI and TcII—which should have in theory been present as 16% (1/6) of all sequences in the controls respectively—were in fact present (on average) at only 2.9% and 0.03% among the four samples where all three STs were recovered (S2 Fig.). Amplicon sequencing from the two most concentrated controls (57 ng/uL and 125 ng/uL genomic DNA respectively) resulted in poor sequence yields and a failure to recover all three STs. Unsurprisingly perhaps in the light of the control data, most clinical samples were dominated by sequences from a single group, with minor contributions from others (Fig. 2). Indeed sequences recovered from many strains were monomorphic at the 97% identity level—especially in Cochabamba. As such, comparisons based on ND5 are necessarily descriptive and meaningful alpha (within sample) and beta (between sample) diversity statistics were not calculated. Fig. 2 shows the distribution of DTUs among samples as defined by the ND5 locus. Most Cochabamba chronic cases samples were assigned to a single sequence within the TcIII-VI group (likely to be TcV, as we defined with standard genotyping assays [41] with the exception to two TcI cases—PCC 240 and PCC 289 (Fig. 2, Panel B). Sequence-type diversity in Goias was considerably higher (Fig. 2, Panel A). In this case the TcII group, rather than the TcIII-VI group, predominated. Unlike in Bolivia, sequences from other groups were present alongside TcII in multiple patients but at frequencies two orders of magnitude lower. Congenital pairs that originated from Cochabamba resembled chronic cases from the same region in their DTU composition (TcIII-VI group predominant, Fig. 2, Panel C). Strikingly, mother/child pair CIUF65 (B5) and CIUF75 (M5) share similar mixed infection profiles (TcI/ TcIII-VI) at similar relative abundances (c.1:1000), consistent with the minor to major genotype abundance ratios observed in Goias. The same is also true for the Goias congenital pair (Fig. 1) which both showed TcII/TcI mixes. Finally, sequential isolates taken from the same Goias chronic patient at different time points suggest that minor abundance genotypes are not always consistently detectable in the blood (Fig. 2): TcI is absent at first sampling of patient y, but present at the second sampling. For patient z, the TcIII-VI genotype is only present in the first of the two sample points. For both Cochabamba and Goias, reference to the control data suggests that ‘minor genotypes’ could be substantially more abundant in the patients than the amplicon sequence data suggest.
Fig 2

Bar plot showing sequence type identity and abundance defined at 97% similarity for the ND5 locus across all samples.

A—Goias cohort chronic/intermediate cases; B—Cochabamba chronic/intermediate cases; C—Cochabamba congenital cases. Y axes show log transformed abundance (read counts). X axes show clustered bars for individual samples. Sequence type identities are given in the legend. Stars denote congenital pair from Goias. Labels x (6416 / 6452), y (6401 / 6536) and z (6379 / 6445) sample pairs from the same patient at different time points (see Table 1).

Bar plot showing sequence type identity and abundance defined at 97% similarity for the ND5 locus across all samples.

A—Goias cohort chronic/intermediate cases; B—Cochabamba chronic/intermediate cases; C—Cochabamba congenital cases. Y axes show log transformed abundance (read counts). X axes show clustered bars for individual samples. Sequence type identities are given in the legend. Stars denote congenital pair from Goias. Labels x (6416 / 6452), y (6401 / 6536) and z (6379 / 6445) sample pairs from the same patient at different time points (see Table 1).

TcGP63I surface protease alpha diversity among clinical and congenital cases

Alpha diversity measurements aim to summarise the diversity of species (in this case STs), within an ecological unit (in this case a host). We summarized the number of STs and their relative abundance in each of our samples, using the Shannon Index (SI) [42]. Among non-congenital cases, our aim was to evaluate possible associations between TcGP63I antigenic diversity and several epidemiological and clinical parameters—age, sex and disease status. We used analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) to test for the effect of these parameters on intra-host antigenic diversity (STs defined both at 97% and 99% for comparison), combining continuous (age) and categorical (sex, clinical forms) data. In Cochabamba, regardless of the order in which parameters were included as factors in the model, there was no evidence for a main effect of age, sex or symptoms on alpha diversity (SI) at either ST divergence level (97% ST Age: p = 0.734; Sex: p = 0.298; clinical form: p = 0.136. 99% ST—Age: p = 0.854; Sex: p = 0.169; clinical form = 0.0988). Similarly, ANCOVAs were non-significant for an association between the SI and age, sex or symptoms in Goias (97% ST—Age: p = 0.382; Sex: p = 0.535; clinical form: p = 0.486. 99% ST—Age: p = 0.319; Sex: p = 0.696; clinical form: p = 0.697). Finally, we undertook linear regressions of SI with age in each population. As one might expect from previous ANCOVAs, no significant correlation was detected (Goias R = 0.0233, p = 0.340 (97% ST); R = 0.0256, p = 0.3049 (99% ST) Cochabamba R = 0.0287, p = 0.429 (97% ST); R = 0.0230 p = 0.479(99% ST)). Congenital comparisons were made pairwise between mother and infant at 99% ST similarity. In addition to the ten matched isolate pairs from Cochabamba, a single pair from Goias was also included (6718 & 6720) in the comparisons. The results of the alpha diversity comparisons are shown in Fig. 3, and read depths were balanced between samples. In terms of the absolute number of STs identified, infants exceeded mothers in most instances (pairs 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 & 9). In the remaining cases however (4/11), the number of antigenic sequence types was greater in the mother. Shannon diversity index comparisons between mothers and infants, which also takes ST abundance into account, suggested that some differences (e.g. pairs 4, 5 &6) might be marginal (Fig. 3).
Fig 3

Alpha diversity indices for TcGP63I amplicon diversity derived from pairs of congenital Chagas disease cases.

Diversity indices were derived from STs defined at 99% sequence similarity. Bar plot and associated x-axis on the right hand side shows the Shannon diversity index calculated in Mothur [34], with error bars defining upper and lower 95% confidence intervals.

Alpha diversity indices for TcGP63I amplicon diversity derived from pairs of congenital Chagas disease cases.

Diversity indices were derived from STs defined at 99% sequence similarity. Bar plot and associated x-axis on the right hand side shows the Shannon diversity index calculated in Mothur [34], with error bars defining upper and lower 95% confidence intervals.

TcGP63I ST distributions among clinical and congenital CD patients

Individual sample sequence datasets within each of the different study cohorts (Cochabamba congenital, Cochabamba non-congenital and Goias) were merged to facilitate analysis of the distribution of antigen 99% STs among individuals (i.e. beta-diversity comparisons). Pairwise weighted Unifrac distances were calculated within cohorts of chronic cases from Cochabamba and Goias to examine whether the sequence diversity of the TcGP63I antigenic repertoire present in each patient could be associated with disease outcome. Principal coordinate analyses of the resulting matrices are displayed in Fig. 4. Among cases from Goias, repertoires varied considerably among cases, with several outliers. However, repertoires from symptomatic and asymptomatic cases were broadly overlapping in terms of sequence identity, and no clustering was noted among different symptom classes either (Fig. 4, Plot B). Permutational multivariate analysis confirmed the absence of a link between ST clustering and symptoms as well as symptom classes (p = 0.77 & 0.74 respectively). However, ST clustering and age were weakly associated (p = 0.049), consistent perhaps with exposure of individuals among different age groups to different circulating parasite genotypes at their time of infection. TcGP63I read yields permitted comparisons for only two pairs of sequential isolates from the sample patients—x and y (see Table 1)—both of which showed closely clustering, although non-identical, profiles. TcGP63I diversity between Cochabamba chronic cases was arguably lower, with the exception of two outliers unambiguously identified as TcI with reference to the ND5 locus (all others were classified as TcIII-VI—likely TcV). Again, however, symptomatic and asymptomatic cases were broadly overlapping.
Fig 4

Principal coordinates analysis of sequence diversity between chronic Chagas Disease patient TcGP63I antigenic repertoires.

Genetic distances are based on a weighted unifrac metric. Plot A shows diversity comparisons among Go-as asymptomatic (asympt) and symptomatic (sympt) clinical cases, as well as one acute case. Plot B shows Goias cases with symptoms categorised as acute, card (cardiopathy), card + mega (cardiopathy as well as megacolon and / or megaesophagous), mega (megacolon and / or megaesophagous) or asympt (asymptomatic). Plot C shows comparisons among Cochabamba clinical cases (not including congenital cases) classified as either asymptomatic (asympt) and symptomatic (sympt). The dashed circle on plot C indicates samples unambiguously defined as TcI at the ND5 locus. Pairs of sequential isolates from the same patient are labelled x and y respectively.

Principal coordinates analysis of sequence diversity between chronic Chagas Disease patient TcGP63I antigenic repertoires.

Genetic distances are based on a weighted unifrac metric. Plot A shows diversity comparisons among Go-as asymptomatic (asympt) and symptomatic (sympt) clinical cases, as well as one acute case. Plot B shows Goias cases with symptoms categorised as acute, card (cardiopathy), card + mega (cardiopathy as well as megacolon and / or megaesophagous), mega (megacolon and / or megaesophagous) or asympt (asymptomatic). Plot C shows comparisons among Cochabamba clinical cases (not including congenital cases) classified as either asymptomatic (asympt) and symptomatic (sympt). The dashed circle on plot C indicates samples unambiguously defined as TcI at the ND5 locus. Pairs of sequential isolates from the same patient are labelled x and y respectively. Sequence type profile comparisons among Cochabamba congenital cases were made for 99% STs and are displayed in heatmap format in Fig. 5. There are two key features of interest. The first is that profiles in mother an infant can match very closely (e.g. pairs 2&6). The second is that novel STs were present in the infant sample with respect to the mother in half of the cases. Indeed, in pair 9, the infant profile was radically different to that of the mother.
Fig 5

Heatmap comparing the TcGP63I antigenic repertoires of mother and infant congenital pairs.

Pairs are indicated down the left hand side of the image (y axis). The mid-point rooted maximum likelihood tree on the x axis describes relationships among the 99% similarity sequence types (STs) identified in UPRASE [35] and was generated in Topali under equal-frequency transversion model, allowing gamma distributed weights across sites [68]. Values on dendrogram notes indicate % bootstrap support. Starred congenital pairs are those where STs are present in the infant but not in the mother.

Heatmap comparing the TcGP63I antigenic repertoires of mother and infant congenital pairs.

Pairs are indicated down the left hand side of the image (y axis). The mid-point rooted maximum likelihood tree on the x axis describes relationships among the 99% similarity sequence types (STs) identified in UPRASE [35] and was generated in Topali under equal-frequency transversion model, allowing gamma distributed weights across sites [68]. Values on dendrogram notes indicate % bootstrap support. Starred congenital pairs are those where STs are present in the infant but not in the mother.

Population-level Ka/Ks ratios within and between TcGP63I gene family members

Trimmed TcGP63 reads, pre-filtered for quality and PCR errors, were pooled within each study site (Bolivia, Goias). To further reduce minority SNPs and PCR errors, STs were defined at 99% with each site in UPARSE [35]. Ka/Ks ratio estimates within each study area indicated a significant excess of synonymous mutations among STs (Goias = 0.8354, Bolivia = 0.7515) averaged across sites (Table 2). However, when calculations were based on diversity present among well represented STs of each gene family member (TcGP63Ia and TcGP63Ib, 97% cut-off [24]) a powerful and significant excess of non-synonymous substitutions was noted within each study area (Ka/Ks, Goias, ST1 = 2.6436, ST4 = 6.3415; Bolivia ST3 = 2.8059; Table 2). Again, calculations were based not on individual sequences, but rather 99% STs within predefined 97% clusters. The position of the 97% STs in question is shown in the tree in S3 Fig., with clear similarity between those clusters under apparent diversifying selection (Goias ST1 & 2, and Bolivia ST3) with TcGP63Ia and TcGP63Ib references respectively [24].

Discussion

In this study our aim was to collect a cohort of T. cruzi samples from clinical CD cases, representative of different endemic regions and of different ages and disease presentations, to explore links between CD epidemiology and multiplicity of infection. To provide a robust, sensitive and quantifiable means of assessing intra-host parasite diversity we first implemented standardized parasite isolation (and enrichment) strategies within each study cohort. Latterly, we developed an amplicon sequencing approach to profile parasite diversity within each patient. Given the relatively short (400–500bp) read lengths generated by next generation sequencing platforms (at the time of experimentation), we chose a rapidly evolving maxicircle gene (ND5) in an attempt to resolve DTU level diversity ([29]). Current multilocus nuclear targets are generally too long (500bp+) to meet our selection criteria [43]). To explore antigenic diversity, we chose a putatively low (5–10) copy number gene family member TcGP63I, expressed on the parasite surface during the amastigote and trypomastigote lifecycle stage and thus exposed to the human immune system [24]. Given that both ND5 and TcGP63I are present as several copies per parasite genome (and potentially show inter-strain copy number variation e.g. [44]), one cannot presume a 1:1 relationship between ST and parasite individual, even if we were able to account for the PCR amplification bias we detected. The identification of a genetically, variable, single copy, surface expressed antigen locus is a major challenge in T. cruzi—antigen genes are by their nature highly repetitive [17,18]. TcGP63I, with its relatively low copy number represents the closest currently available fit, and, as we have shown, provides a useful target for revealing intra-host antigenic diversity. Merozoite surface proteins (MSP) 1 and 2 have traditionally provided useful targets for detecting MOI in P. falciparum (e.g. [45,46]. Furthermore, amplicon sequencing of the MSP locus has been successfully proven to reveal as many as six-fold more variants than traditional PCR-based approaches [15]. The substantial historical interest in defining MOI among P. falciparum owes itself to the strong correlation between MOI and rate of parasite transmission [47]. As such, fluctuations in transmission intensity can be tracked to evaluate the efficiency of vector eradication campaigns, drug treatments, the introduction of insecticide-treated nets etc—without the need to directly estimate the entomological inoculation rate. Evaluation of CD transmission intensity has its own challenges. The presence of infected individuals, triatomine vectors in domestic buildings, incrimination of vectors via human blood meal identification (e.g. [48]) can all help to build the overall picture. However, parasite transmission is likely to occur in only a tiny proportion of blood meals [49,50], and vector efficiency is thought to vary considerably between triatomine species [51]—thus the presence of vectors is no guarantee of transmission. Infection with T. cruzi is lifelong, thus positive patient serology is not a reliable indicator of active parasite transmission either. Traditionally, active T. cruzi transmission has been implied from positive serology among younger age classes. Especially in hyperendemic areas of Bolivia, Paraguay and Argentina the proportion of seroprevalent individuals increases with age [52,53]. MOI in T. cruzi patients should follow a similar trend given a stable force of infection. Furthermore MOI comparisons between disease foci could, controlling for age, facilitate an appreciation of relative transmission intensities—a useful tool for those who wish to track the efficacy of interventions. In the current study, however, we were unable to identify a correlation between MOI and age, even once patient sex and clinical form had been corrected for. Our inability to validate this fundamental prediction has many possible causes. First, patients in each cohort originate from different communities within each study area (Table 1). Micro-geographic variation in T. cruzi genetic diversity is commonly observed (e.g. [11,54,55], and the same is likely to be true for infection intensity. Thus, if patients from different sites share dissimilar histories in the intensity and diversity of exposure to T. cruzi clones, comparisons between them are difficult to make. Secondly, the relationship between MOI and age is not necessarily linear. If a degree of cross-genotype immunity accumulates with exposure, one might expect a slower increase in intra-host antigenic diversity in older age groups. However, this was not the case in our dataset and neither a linear, nor a unimodal relationship could be established. Amplicon sequencing approaches to the study of transmission patterns in human parasites have so far been restricted to those species that replicate and reach high parasitemias in peripheral blood (i.e. T. brucei [56] and P. falciparum [13,15]). T. cruzi trypomastigote circulating parasitemias, as measured by qPCR, are thought to vary considerably between acute (400 parasites/ml), newborn (150–12000 parasites/ml) and chronic (3–16 parasites/ml) cases [25,57]. Nonetheless, they remain several orders of magnitude lower than those that occur during T. brucei or P. falciparum infections. Low circulating T. cruzi parasitemia presents major problems to studies that aim to achieve molecular diagnosis of CD in chronic cases and ours is no exception. One problem is that much of the parasite diversity present in the host is likely to be sequestered in the tissues at any give time [58], as our sequential samples from Goias also suggest. Thus blood stage parasite genetic diversity may be a poor representation of that actually present in the host. Another confounder is culture bias, by which differential growth of clones in culture, as well as loss of clonal diversity during repassage can both influence diversity estimates. Attempts to generate amplicon sequence data directly from clinical blood samples would likely to be thwarted by low circulating parasitemia [25, 56]. Instead we elected to enrich for parasite DNA via culture—in Goias without further repassage, but in Bolivia with at least one repassage before cryopreservation. Low circulating parasitemia in Chagas patients also means it is possible that amplicon-sequencing strategies might rapidly ‘bottom out,’ if few parasites are present within a sample. In our dataset, for example, at the ND5 locus, minority DTUs at 97% divergence can be present as a proportion of < 1 in 1000 (Fig. 1), with the implication that several thousand parasites must be present in the sample. In both Goias and Bolivia matched instances occurred in congenital cases where TcI exists in mother and infant as the minor DTU at similar relative abundance (i.e. 1 in 1000, Fig. 1). It is highly unlikely that these data directly reflect chronic CD parasitemia levels. Instead, with reference to the data we obtained from the controls, PCR amplification bias is a more likely source of unrealistic major to minor genotype ratios. As such, the fourfold over-representation of a ST in the original sample, for example, can result in 100–1000 fold over-representation after PCR. However, while the relative abundance of sequence types recovered using the amplicon approach may be an inaccurate reflection of those present for both ND5 and TcGP63, similar profiles between mother and infant suggests that this bias is likely to be consistent across samples. Thus comparisons between samples are still valid. Furthermore for ND5 at least it seems that T. cruzi frequently exchanges mitochondrial (maxicircle) genomes with little apparent evidence of nuclear exchange [11,29]. Fusion of maxicircle genomes occurs transiently during T. brucei genetic exchange events [59], and may also do so in T. cruzi. Even though standard maxicircle genotyping of progeny only ever reveals a single parent in both species, it is possible that heterologous maxicircle sequences may persist at low abundance in parasite clones. Such a phenomenon could explain the DTU sequence type ratios observed, and this study is the first to sequence a maxicircle gene to this depth. There is general consensus in the literature is that the likelihood of congenital CD transmission is not strongly influenced by the genotype of the parasite infecting the mother [60-62]. Nonetheless, the majority of cases are reported in the Southern Cone region of South America, providing a circumstantial link with major human-associated T. cruzi genotypes TcV TcII, and TcVI. In this study, in the one mixed infection we found, major and minor DTUs (TcVI / TcI) detected in the mother at the ND5 locus were recovered from the infant in similar proportions. TcGP63I beta diversity comparisons of STs defined at 99% showed substantial sharing of between mother and infant (Fig. 5). However, both beta diversity comparisons (Fig. 5) and total ST diversity (alpha) comparisons (Fig. 3) at 99% indicate that while maternal diversity sometimes exceeds that of the infant (explicable perhaps by sequestration in the mother and selective or stochastic trans-placental transfer), the reverse is frequently true. The occurrence of STs in the infant, not present in the mother, has several possible explanations. The infants sampled in this study were neonates, thus superinfection can be ruled out as a source of further parasite clonal diversity. A recent study of infected neonates in Argentina estimated mean infant parasitemia at 1,789 parasites/ml via qPCR—far in excess of that one might expect in the mother [57]. Thus the parasite sample size discrepancy between mother and infant perhaps explains the unexpected levels of diversity in the infant. Even though the TcGP63I gene family is apparently under intense diversifying selection, it seems unlikely that point mutation could generate novel variants over such a short time scale to explain genetic diversity in the infant. Structural variants and homologous recombination are a potential source of diversity, although most, if not all of recombinants should have been excluded in the quality filtering stages, and would be hard to distinguish from PCR chimeras in any case. Many important T. cruzi surface genes belong to large, recently expanded paralogous multigene families [17]. The abundance of these gene copies highlights their likely adaptive significance in terms of infectivity and host immune evasion, especially because trypansomatids exert so little control of gene expression at the level of transcription [63]. In Leishmania major, for example, it has been recently shown that gene amplification may rapidly duplicate segments of the genome in response to environmental stress [64]. As well as expansion, adaptive change is also likely to occur at the amino acid level among members of paralogous gene families, as has been suggested for T. brucei [65]. Despite the relatively small size of the TcGP63I gene family, the amplicon sequencing approach we employed allowed us to explore selection at the level of the gene within the population, i.e. within and between parasite genomes within and between hosts at the population level. Highly elevated non-synonymous substitutions suggest intense diversifying selection within TcGP63Ia and TcGP63Ia STs respectively for those assigned to TcII or TcI. STs from patients infected with TcIII-TcVI (putative TcV) showed few apparent substitutions (Table 2), perhaps consistent with the recent origin of this DTU [66]. The sequence fragment we studied was outside the zinc binding domain of this metalloprotease, indicating selective forces can act on this protein independent of its core proteolyic function, perhaps through repeated exposure to host immunity. It is important not to overlook the potential importance of multiclonal infections for parasitic disease, both as markers of population level factors such as parasite transmission, but also at the host level, including immunity and disease progression. In this study we have developed an amplicon sequencing approach to probe parasite genetic diversity within and among clinical CD cases to unprecedented depth. While our approach shows the power of this amplicon-seq to resolve diversity in clinical and congenital CD cases, it also highlights the potential biases that might be introduced with the addition of a PCR step. A tool that allows the accurate evaluation MOI would be valuable for tracking transmission rates at restricted disease foci (i.e. villages, outbreaks) in the context of measuring the success of intervention strategies. A similar tool could provide a powerful means of longitudinal tracking of T. cruzi infections in terms of disease progression, treatment failure and immunosuppression. Here we demonstrate that amplicon sequencing could have a role to play in this context. However, as sequencing costs decline and reference genome assemblies improve, whole genome deep sequencing, perhaps even of individual parasite cells, becomes and increasingly viable option as it already has for Plasmodium sp. [7,67].

TcGP63Ia and Ib amino acid alignments showing amplicon seq primer binding sites in relation to putative functional domains.

Amino acid sequences are derived for those define by Cuevas and colleagues [24]. The colour key on the left hand side indicates primer binding sites and functional domains. The green shaded regions indicate the area covered by the Illumina paired end reads along each amplicon. The purple shaded central region indicates the area not covered. (TIFF) Click here for additional data file.

Bar plot of amplicon sequence data generated from control DTU mixes.

Expected ratios of ND5 sequence types (far right) are compared to those recovered via amplicon sequencing. All three sequence types (I, II, III-VI) were recovered from all but the two most concentrated control mixes. However, the relative proportions of each sequence type derived from amplicon sequence data were radically different to that expected. (TIFF) Click here for additional data file.

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of 97% TcGP63I STs derived in this study and available T. cruzi and T. cruzi marinkellei TcGP63 paralogues.

Homologous sequences were recovered from www.TriTrypDB.org via BLAST. The appropriate substitution model was defined as the transversion model with invariable sites plus gamma in Topali [68]. Abundant ST labels correspond with those indicated in Table 2. Branches are coloured by source DTU or red, for sequences generated in this study. Reference sequences TcGP3Ia and TcGP63Ib from the literature are also shown along side 97% sequence types generated in this study [24]. (TIFF) Click here for additional data file.

Quality filtered and assembled amplicon sequence data in FASTA format.

(GZ) Click here for additional data file.
  64 in total

1.  Resolution of multiclonal infections of Trypanosoma cruzi from naturally infected triatomine bugs and from experimentally infected mice by direct plating on a sensitive solid medium.

Authors:  Matthew Yeo; Michael D Lewis; Hernan J Carrasco; Nidia Acosta; Martin Llewellyn; Sebastião Aldo da Silva Valente; Vera de Costa Valente; Antonieta Rojas de Arias; Michael A Miles
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 2.  Chagas disease.

Authors:  Anis Rassi; Anis Rassi; José Antonio Marin-Neto
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-04-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Genotyping of Trypanosoma cruzi: systematic selection of assays allowing rapid and accurate discrimination of all known lineages.

Authors:  Michael D Lewis; Jonathan Ma; Matthew Yeo; Hernán J Carrasco; Martin S Llewellyn; Michael A Miles
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  [The first 13 years of controlling Chagas' disease in Mambaí, Goiás, Brazil 1980-1992].

Authors:  P Marsden; M T García-Zapata; E A Castillo; A R Prata; V O Macedo
Journal:  Bol Oficina Sanit Panam       Date:  1994-02

Review 5.  The Southern Cone Initiative against Chagas disease.

Authors:  C J Schofield; J C Dias
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.870

6.  The genome sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas disease.

Authors:  Najib M El-Sayed; Peter J Myler; Daniella C Bartholomeu; Daniel Nilsson; Gautam Aggarwal; Anh-Nhi Tran; Elodie Ghedin; Elizabeth A Worthey; Arthur L Delcher; Gaëlle Blandin; Scott J Westenberger; Elisabet Caler; Gustavo C Cerqueira; Carole Branche; Brian Haas; Atashi Anupama; Erik Arner; Lena Aslund; Philip Attipoe; Esteban Bontempi; Frédéric Bringaud; Peter Burton; Eithon Cadag; David A Campbell; Mark Carrington; Jonathan Crabtree; Hamid Darban; Jose Franco da Silveira; Pieter de Jong; Kimberly Edwards; Paul T Englund; Gholam Fazelina; Tamara Feldblyum; Marcela Ferella; Alberto Carlos Frasch; Keith Gull; David Horn; Lihua Hou; Yiting Huang; Ellen Kindlund; Michele Klingbeil; Sindy Kluge; Hean Koo; Daniela Lacerda; Mariano J Levin; Hernan Lorenzi; Tin Louie; Carlos Renato Machado; Richard McCulloch; Alan McKenna; Yumi Mizuno; Jeremy C Mottram; Siri Nelson; Stephen Ochaya; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Grace Pai; Marilyn Parsons; Martin Pentony; Ulf Pettersson; Mihai Pop; Jose Luis Ramirez; Joel Rinta; Laura Robertson; Steven L Salzberg; Daniel O Sanchez; Amber Seyler; Reuben Sharma; Jyoti Shetty; Anjana J Simpson; Ellen Sisk; Martti T Tammi; Rick Tarleton; Santuza Teixeira; Susan Van Aken; Christy Vogt; Pauline N Ward; Bill Wickstead; Jennifer Wortman; Owen White; Claire M Fraser; Kenneth D Stuart; Björn Andersson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Congenital Chagas disease in Bolivia is not associated with DNA polymorphism of Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Myrna Virreira; Cristina Alonso-Vega; Marco Solano; Juan Jijena; Laurent Brutus; Zulema Bustamante; Carine Truyens; Dominique Schneider; Faustino Torrico; Yves Carlier; Michal Svoboda
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 8.  Major surface protease of trypanosomatids: one size fits all?

Authors:  Chaoqun Yao
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.

Authors:  J Gregory Caporaso; Justin Kuczynski; Jesse Stombaugh; Kyle Bittinger; Frederic D Bushman; Elizabeth K Costello; Noah Fierer; Antonio Gonzalez Peña; Julia K Goodrich; Jeffrey I Gordon; Gavin A Huttley; Scott T Kelley; Dan Knights; Jeremy E Koenig; Ruth E Ley; Catherine A Lozupone; Daniel McDonald; Brian D Muegge; Meg Pirrung; Jens Reeder; Joel R Sevinsky; Peter J Turnbaugh; William A Walters; Jeremy Widmann; Tanya Yatsunenko; Jesse Zaneveld; Rob Knight
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Trypanosoma cruzi mitochondrial maxicircles display species- and strain-specific variation and a conserved element in the non-coding region.

Authors:  Scott J Westenberger; Gustavo C Cerqueira; Najib M El-Sayed; Bianca Zingales; David A Campbell; Nancy R Sturm
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  18 in total

1.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Trypanosoma cruzi from Pregnant Women and Newborns from Argentina, Honduras, and Mexico Suggests an Association of Parasite Haplotypes with Congenital Transmission of the Parasite.

Authors:  Claudia Herrera; Carine Truyens; Eric Dumonteil; Jackeline Alger; Sergio Sosa-Estani; Maria L Cafferata; Luz Gibbons; Alvaro Ciganda; Maria L Matute; Concepcion Zuniga; Yves Carlier; Pierre Buekens
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 2.  Chagas Disease Diagnostic Applications: Present Knowledge and Future Steps.

Authors:  V Balouz; F Agüero; C A Buscaglia
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.870

Review 3.  Between a bug and a hard place: Trypanosoma cruzi genetic diversity and the clinical outcomes of Chagas disease.

Authors:  Louisa A Messenger; Michael A Miles; Caryn Bern
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  DNA Microarray Detection of 18 Important Human Blood Protozoan Species.

Authors:  Mu-Xin Chen; Lin Ai; Jun-Hu Chen; Xin-Yu Feng; Shao-Hong Chen; Yu-Chun Cai; Yan Lu; Xiao-Nong Zhou; Jia-Xu Chen; Wei Hu
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-12-02

Review 5.  A Brief View of the Surface Membrane Proteins from Trypanosoma cruzi.

Authors:  Ángel de la Cruz Pech-Canul; Victor Monteón; Rosa-Lidia Solís-Oviedo
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-06-05

6.  Different genotypes of Trypanosoma cruzi produce distinctive placental environment genetic response in chronic experimental infection.

Authors:  Natalia Anahí Juiz; María Elisa Solana; Gonzalo Raúl Acevedo; Alejandro Francisco Benatar; Juan Carlos Ramirez; Priscilla Almeida da Costa; Andrea Mara Macedo; Silvia Andrea Longhi; Alejandro G Schijman
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-03-08

7.  Detailed ecological associations of triatomines revealed by metabarcoding and next-generation sequencing: implications for triatomine behavior and Trypanosoma cruzi transmission cycles.

Authors:  Eric Dumonteil; Maria-Jesus Ramirez-Sierra; Silvia Pérez-Carrillo; Christian Teh-Poot; Claudia Herrera; Sébastien Gourbière; Etienne Waleckx
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Deep Sequencing to Detect Diversity of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection in Patients Coinfected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chagas Disease.

Authors:  Natalie M Bowman; Sujata Balasubramanian; Robert H Gilman; Christian Parobek; Maritza Calderon; Andreea Waltmann; Louisa A Messenger; Leny Sanchez; Caryn Bern; Jonathan J Juliano
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 7.759

Review 9.  Evolutionary ecology of Chagas disease; what do we know and what do we need?

Authors:  Alheli Flores-Ferrer; Olivier Marcou; Etienne Waleckx; Eric Dumonteil; Sébastien Gourbière
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-12-25       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  High-resolution profiling of linear B-cell epitopes from mucin-associated surface proteins (MASPs) of Trypanosoma cruzi during human infections.

Authors:  Ignacio M Durante; Pablo E La Spina; Santiago J Carmona; Fernán Agüero; Carlos A Buscaglia
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.